No Cover Image

Journal article 175 views 9 downloads

Sense of security in LGBT+ tourism

Cristian de Oliveira Borges, Ítalo Carballo Garcia, Tiago Savi Mondo, Solano de Souza Braga, Erose Sthapit Orcid Logo, Brian Garrod Orcid Logo

Tourism and Hospitality Research

Swansea University Author: Brian Garrod Orcid Logo

  • 71025.VoR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

    Download (1.11MB)

Abstract

The present study analyses user-generated content from Tripadvisor to identify critical factors influencing LGBT+ tourists’ sense of security. A total of 34,658 relevant online reviews were collected in September 2024 through the Outscraper platform. The ROBERTA language model was then used to categ...

Full description

Published in: Tourism and Hospitality Research
ISSN: 1467-3584 1742-9692
Published: SAGE Publications 2025
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa71025
Abstract: The present study analyses user-generated content from Tripadvisor to identify critical factors influencing LGBT+ tourists’ sense of security. A total of 34,658 relevant online reviews were collected in September 2024 through the Outscraper platform. The ROBERTA language model was then used to categorise the reviews into positive, negative, or neutral sentiments and examine keywords. Security emerged as a key factor in LGBT+ tourists’ satisfaction, which was primarily influenced by quality of service and accommodation infrastructure. Terms such as “friendly” and “welcoming” were frequently found in positive reviews, whereas words like “fear,” “risk” and “discrimination” appeared in negative ones. The paper concludes that, in contrast to common assumptions, LGBT+ tourists’ sense of security is not a static attribute but rather a negotiated outcome of the complex interaction of symbols and social signals.
Keywords: LGBT+, perceived safety, security, user-generated content, sentiments, online reviews
College: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Funders: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.