Journal article 60 views
A meta-analysis of parental burnout interventions
Agata M Urbanowicz,
Nicolas B Verger,
Rebecca Shankland,
Jaynie Rance 
,
Paul Bennett,
Aurélie Gauchet
,
Paul Bennett,
Aurélie Gauchet
Journal of Affective Disorders, Start page: 121022
Swansea University Authors:
Jaynie Rance , Paul Bennett
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.jad.2025.121022
Abstract
Purpose: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological and educational interventions for parental burnout, assess the durability of intervention effects, examine potential moderators, and identify shared intervention components. Methods: Fifteen studies comprising 18 interv...
| Published in: | Journal of Affective Disorders |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0165-0327 1573-2517 |
| Published: |
Elsevier BV
2025
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa71202 |
| Abstract: |
Purpose: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological and educational interventions for parental burnout, assess the durability of intervention effects, examine potential moderators, and identify shared intervention components. Methods: Fifteen studies comprising 18 intervention arms (total N = 1380), including 12 randomised controlled trial arms (n = 804), were synthesised using Hedges' g under random-effects models. Heterogeneity, publication bias, and potential moderators (intervention type, population, and programme duration) were examined using meta-regression analyses. Main results: Randomised controlled trials produced moderate-to-large reductions in parental burnout compared with control conditions, with effects maintained for up to three months following intervention. Effects were consistent across populations (general samples and parents of children with chronic conditions) and intervention approaches (cognitive–behavioural, mindfulness- and acceptance-based, educational, and resources–balance). Moderate heterogeneity was observed. Meta-regression analyses indicated no significant moderation by intervention type or population. Programme duration, defined as total intervention length in weeks, emerged as a tentative moderator, with six-week programmes associated with larger reductions in parental burnout, whereas other durations were not significantly associated with outcomes. This finding remains exploratory. Analyses of small-study effects and publication bias did not alter conclusions. Five components were consistently identified across interventions: psychoeducation; self-regulation and stress management; values and identity work; experiential practice; and relational awareness. Implications: Psychological and educational interventions effectively reduce parental burnout, with benefits sustained over time. Focusing on shared core components rather than specific modalities may support intervention development, while future trials should clarify optimal intervention duration and remaining sources of heterogeneity. Prospero registration ID CRD42021231247 Open science framework https://osf.io/3g67n/?view_only=8db62532d857478baef1a27ed916e0e6 |
|---|---|
| Item Description: |
Review Article |
| Keywords: |
Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Parental burnout interventions; Parental burnout treatment |
| College: |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| Funders: |
This work was supported by the Communauté Université Grenoble Alpes for the project IDEX Parent-Prev 2018. |
| Start Page: |
121022 |