Values and Factor Ascription Arguments

Zurek, Tomasz; Wyner, Adam; Bench-Capon, Trevor

doi:10.3233/faia241249

Book chapter 31 views 6 downloads

Values and Factor Ascription Arguments

Tomasz Zurek, Adam Wyner

, Trevor Bench-Capon

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Volume: 395

Swansea University Author: Adam Wyner

PDF | Version of Record

© 2024 The Authors. This article is published online with Open Access by IOS Press and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Download (225.32KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.3233/faia241249

Abstract

Argumentation is often an attempt to resolve disagreement, but it is not always possible to reach a resolution. This is illustrated in law where multi-judge trials often end with a split decision. Not only do the judges disagree as to outcome (dissenting opinions), but also as to the reasons for a g...

Full description

Published in:	Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
ISBN:	9781643685625
ISSN:	0922-6389 1879-8314
Published:	IOS Press 2024
Online Access:	Check full text
URI:	https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa70978

first_indexed	2025-11-24T16:01:36Z
last_indexed	2026-01-16T05:32:52Z
id	cronfa70978
recordtype	SURis
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2026-01-15T20:25:01.2258682</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>70978</id><entry>2025-11-24</entry><title>Values and Factor Ascription Arguments</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>51fa34a3136b8e81fc273fce73e88099</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-2958-3428</ORCID><firstname>Adam</firstname><surname>Wyner</surname><name>Adam Wyner</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2025-11-24</date><deptcode>MACS</deptcode><abstract>Argumentation is often an attempt to resolve disagreement, but it is not always possible to reach a resolution. This is illustrated in law where multi-judge trials often end with a split decision. Not only do the judges disagree as to outcome (dissenting opinions), but also as to the reasons for a given outcome (concurring opinions). These disagreements can be explained in terms of different values held by the judges concerned. But while the role of values in determining which arguments are accepted has been widely explored, values can also determine which arguments can be constructed. The paper provides an analysis of this phenomenon.</abstract><type>Book chapter</type><journal>Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications</journal><volume>395</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>IOS Press</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic>9781643685625</isbnElectronic><issnPrint>0922-6389</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1879-8314</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>5</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-12-05</publishedDate><doi>10.3233/faia241249</doi><url/><notes>Research Article</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Mathematics and Computer Science School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>MACS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2026-01-15T20:25:01.2258682</lastEdited><Created>2025-11-24T14:21:17.6969797</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Tomasz</firstname><surname>Zurek</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Adam</firstname><surname>Wyner</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2958-3428</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Trevor</firstname><surname>Bench-Capon</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>70978__35693__e4b6c37897694c4a895963cdb3eb7d61.pdf</filename><originalFilename>FAIA-395-FAIA241249.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2025-11-24T14:27:57.3169538</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>230729</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2024 The Authors. This article is published online with Open Access by IOS Press and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en_US</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling	2026-01-15T20:25:01.2258682 v2 70978 2025-11-24 Values and Factor Ascription Arguments 51fa34a3136b8e81fc273fce73e88099 0000-0002-2958-3428 Adam Wyner Adam Wyner true false 2025-11-24 MACS Argumentation is often an attempt to resolve disagreement, but it is not always possible to reach a resolution. This is illustrated in law where multi-judge trials often end with a split decision. Not only do the judges disagree as to outcome (dissenting opinions), but also as to the reasons for a given outcome (concurring opinions). These disagreements can be explained in terms of different values held by the judges concerned. But while the role of values in determining which arguments are accepted has been widely explored, values can also determine which arguments can be constructed. The paper provides an analysis of this phenomenon. Book chapter Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 395 IOS Press 9781643685625 0922-6389 1879-8314 5 12 2024 2024-12-05 10.3233/faia241249 Research Article COLLEGE NANME Mathematics and Computer Science School COLLEGE CODE MACS Swansea University 2026-01-15T20:25:01.2258682 2025-11-24T14:21:17.6969797 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science Tomasz Zurek 1 Adam Wyner 0000-0002-2958-3428 2 Trevor Bench-Capon 3 70978__35693__e4b6c37897694c4a895963cdb3eb7d61.pdf FAIA-395-FAIA241249.pdf 2025-11-24T14:27:57.3169538 Output 230729 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2024 The Authors. This article is published online with Open Access by IOS Press and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0). true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en_US
title	Values and Factor Ascription Arguments
spellingShingle	Values and Factor Ascription Arguments Adam Wyner
title_short	Values and Factor Ascription Arguments
title_full	Values and Factor Ascription Arguments
title_fullStr	Values and Factor Ascription Arguments
title_full_unstemmed	Values and Factor Ascription Arguments
title_sort	Values and Factor Ascription Arguments
author_id_str_mv	51fa34a3136b8e81fc273fce73e88099
author_id_fullname_str_mv	51fa34a3136b8e81fc273fce73e88099_***_Adam Wyner
author	Adam Wyner
author2	Tomasz Zurek Adam Wyner Trevor Bench-Capon
format	Book chapter
container_title	Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
container_volume	395
publishDate	2024
institution	Swansea University
isbn	9781643685625
issn	0922-6389 1879-8314
doi_str_mv	10.3233/faia241249
publisher	IOS Press
college_str	Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id	facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title	Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id	facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title	Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str	School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science
document_store_str	1
active_str	0
description	Argumentation is often an attempt to resolve disagreement, but it is not always possible to reach a resolution. This is illustrated in law where multi-judge trials often end with a split decision. Not only do the judges disagree as to outcome (dissenting opinions), but also as to the reasons for a given outcome (concurring opinions). These disagreements can be explained in terms of different values held by the judges concerned. But while the role of values in determining which arguments are accepted has been widely explored, values can also determine which arguments can be constructed. The paper provides an analysis of this phenomenon.
published_date	2024-12-05T05:34:07Z
_version_	1856987041343995904
score	11.096068

Values and Factor Ascription Arguments

Similar Items