No Cover Image

Book chapter 31 views 6 downloads

Values and Factor Ascription Arguments

Tomasz Zurek, Adam Wyner Orcid Logo, Trevor Bench-Capon

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Volume: 395

Swansea University Author: Adam Wyner Orcid Logo

  • FAIA-395-FAIA241249.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2024 The Authors. This article is published online with Open Access by IOS Press and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0).

    Download (225.32KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.3233/faia241249

Abstract

Argumentation is often an attempt to resolve disagreement, but it is not always possible to reach a resolution. This is illustrated in law where multi-judge trials often end with a split decision. Not only do the judges disagree as to outcome (dissenting opinions), but also as to the reasons for a g...

Full description

Published in: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
ISBN: 9781643685625
ISSN: 0922-6389 1879-8314
Published: IOS Press 2024
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa70978
Abstract: Argumentation is often an attempt to resolve disagreement, but it is not always possible to reach a resolution. This is illustrated in law where multi-judge trials often end with a split decision. Not only do the judges disagree as to outcome (dissenting opinions), but also as to the reasons for a given outcome (concurring opinions). These disagreements can be explained in terms of different values held by the judges concerned. But while the role of values in determining which arguments are accepted has been widely explored, values can also determine which arguments can be constructed. The paper provides an analysis of this phenomenon.
Item Description: Research Article
College: Faculty of Science and Engineering