No Cover Image

Journal article 56 views 7 downloads

Practice makes perfect, especially when doing what we like

Irene Reppa Orcid Logo, Siné McDougall

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

Swansea University Author: Irene Reppa Orcid Logo

  • 68889.VOR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © The Author(s) 2025. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

    Download (1.5MB)

Abstract

Previous research has found that aesthetic appeal can facilitate visual search performance. One avenue of enquiry is that appealing icons are processed better than unappealing icons. If appealing stimuli are better processed, then it may be expected that they will benefit from practice more than the...

Full description

Published in: Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
ISSN: 1943-3921 1943-393X
Published: Springer Nature 2025
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa68889
first_indexed 2025-02-14T05:59:08Z
last_indexed 2025-02-26T05:56:20Z
id cronfa68889
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><datestamp>2025-02-25T14:50:28.9018659</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>68889</id><entry>2025-02-14</entry><title>Practice makes perfect, especially when doing what we like</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7824f127c16603af4e08530245a62400</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-2853-2311</ORCID><firstname>Irene</firstname><surname>Reppa</surname><name>Irene Reppa</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2025-02-14</date><deptcode>PSYS</deptcode><abstract>Previous research has found that aesthetic appeal can facilitate visual search performance. One avenue of enquiry is that appealing icons are processed better than unappealing icons. If appealing stimuli are better processed, then it may be expected that they will benefit from practice more than their unappealing counterparts. In the current study (N = 100) we examined the effect of stimulus appeal on visual search performance. Half of the participants searched for appealing icons first, followed by unappealing icons, and the order was reversed for the other half. First, visual search performance benefited from stimulus appeal, and specifically the interaction of stimulus appeal and complexity &#x2013; visual stimulus appeal led to better search performance but only for stimuli that were visually complex, with no effect of appeal for visually simple stimuli. Second, task experience benefited appealing icons more than unappealing icons. These results extend current knowledge of the status of visual aesthetic appeal on performance. They provide new evidence that appealing stimuli benefit from practice and are easier to learn compared to their unappealing counterparts.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Attention, Perception, &amp; Psychophysics</journal><volume>0</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Springer Nature</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1943-3921</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1943-393X</issnElectronic><keywords>Attention; Aesthetic appeal; Practice effects; Visual search</keywords><publishedDay>24</publishedDay><publishedMonth>2</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2025</publishedYear><publishedDate>2025-02-24</publishedDate><doi>10.3758/s13414-025-03031-8</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>PSYS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal)</apcterm><funders>Swansea University</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-02-25T14:50:28.9018659</lastEdited><Created>2025-02-14T05:55:34.5215830</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Irene</firstname><surname>Reppa</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2853-2311</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Sin&#xE9;</firstname><surname>McDougall</surname><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>68889__33672__718e5f3d26a244e4b7d9a1e389a4cd9a.pdf</filename><originalFilename>68889.VOR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2025-02-25T14:46:28.0791421</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1572823</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>&#xA9; The Author(s) 2025. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs><OutputDur><Id>302</Id><IsDataAvailableOnline xsi:nil="true"/><DataNotAvailableOnlineReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><IsDurRestrictions xsi:nil="true"/><DurRestrictionReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><DurEmbargoDate xsi:nil="true"/></OutputDur></OutputDurs></rfc1807>
spelling 2025-02-25T14:50:28.9018659 v2 68889 2025-02-14 Practice makes perfect, especially when doing what we like 7824f127c16603af4e08530245a62400 0000-0002-2853-2311 Irene Reppa Irene Reppa true false 2025-02-14 PSYS Previous research has found that aesthetic appeal can facilitate visual search performance. One avenue of enquiry is that appealing icons are processed better than unappealing icons. If appealing stimuli are better processed, then it may be expected that they will benefit from practice more than their unappealing counterparts. In the current study (N = 100) we examined the effect of stimulus appeal on visual search performance. Half of the participants searched for appealing icons first, followed by unappealing icons, and the order was reversed for the other half. First, visual search performance benefited from stimulus appeal, and specifically the interaction of stimulus appeal and complexity – visual stimulus appeal led to better search performance but only for stimuli that were visually complex, with no effect of appeal for visually simple stimuli. Second, task experience benefited appealing icons more than unappealing icons. These results extend current knowledge of the status of visual aesthetic appeal on performance. They provide new evidence that appealing stimuli benefit from practice and are easier to learn compared to their unappealing counterparts. Journal Article Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 0 Springer Nature 1943-3921 1943-393X Attention; Aesthetic appeal; Practice effects; Visual search 24 2 2025 2025-02-24 10.3758/s13414-025-03031-8 COLLEGE NANME Psychology School COLLEGE CODE PSYS Swansea University SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal) Swansea University 2025-02-25T14:50:28.9018659 2025-02-14T05:55:34.5215830 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Irene Reppa 0000-0002-2853-2311 1 Siné McDougall 2 68889__33672__718e5f3d26a244e4b7d9a1e389a4cd9a.pdf 68889.VOR.pdf 2025-02-25T14:46:28.0791421 Output 1572823 application/pdf Version of Record true © The Author(s) 2025. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 302
title Practice makes perfect, especially when doing what we like
spellingShingle Practice makes perfect, especially when doing what we like
Irene Reppa
title_short Practice makes perfect, especially when doing what we like
title_full Practice makes perfect, especially when doing what we like
title_fullStr Practice makes perfect, especially when doing what we like
title_full_unstemmed Practice makes perfect, especially when doing what we like
title_sort Practice makes perfect, especially when doing what we like
author_id_str_mv 7824f127c16603af4e08530245a62400
author_id_fullname_str_mv 7824f127c16603af4e08530245a62400_***_Irene Reppa
author Irene Reppa
author2 Irene Reppa
Siné McDougall
format Journal article
container_title Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
container_volume 0
publishDate 2025
institution Swansea University
issn 1943-3921
1943-393X
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13414-025-03031-8
publisher Springer Nature
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Previous research has found that aesthetic appeal can facilitate visual search performance. One avenue of enquiry is that appealing icons are processed better than unappealing icons. If appealing stimuli are better processed, then it may be expected that they will benefit from practice more than their unappealing counterparts. In the current study (N = 100) we examined the effect of stimulus appeal on visual search performance. Half of the participants searched for appealing icons first, followed by unappealing icons, and the order was reversed for the other half. First, visual search performance benefited from stimulus appeal, and specifically the interaction of stimulus appeal and complexity – visual stimulus appeal led to better search performance but only for stimuli that were visually complex, with no effect of appeal for visually simple stimuli. Second, task experience benefited appealing icons more than unappealing icons. These results extend current knowledge of the status of visual aesthetic appeal on performance. They provide new evidence that appealing stimuli benefit from practice and are easier to learn compared to their unappealing counterparts.
published_date 2025-02-24T08:23:31Z
_version_ 1826738312495235072
score 11.054403