Journal article 11 views
No Grounds for Fictionalism
Rob Fraser 
Philosophical Studies, Volume: 179, Issue: 12, Pages: 3679 - 3687
Swansea University Author:
Rob Fraser
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1007/s11098-022-01855-w
Abstract
I argue that fictionalism about grounding is unmotivated, focusing on Naomi Thompson’s (2022) recent proposal on which the utility of the grounding fiction lies in its facilitating communication about what metaphysically explains what. I show that, despite its apparent dialectical kinship with other...
| Published in: | Philosophical Studies |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0031-8116 1573-0883 |
| Published: |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
2022
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa68391 |
| Abstract: |
I argue that fictionalism about grounding is unmotivated, focusing on Naomi Thompson’s (2022) recent proposal on which the utility of the grounding fiction lies in its facilitating communication about what metaphysically explains what. I show that, despite its apparent dialectical kinship with other metaphysical debates in which fictionalism has a healthy tradition, the grounding debate is different in two key respects. Firstly, grounding talk is not indispensable, nor even particularly convenient as a means of communicating about metaphysical explanation. This undermines the revolutionary proposal. Secondly, talk of grounding primarily occurs within metaphysics, which means the usual options for motivating a non-literal interpretation are ineffective. This undermines the hermeneutic proposal. |
|---|---|
| College: |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| Issue: |
12 |
| Start Page: |
3679 |
| End Page: |
3687 |