Journal article 485 views 108 downloads
A comparative analysis of pulp-derived nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting facial cartilages
Carbohydrate Polymers, Volume: 321, Start page: 121261
Swansea University Authors: Thomas Jovic, Hari Arora , Shareen Doak , Iain Whitaker
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0).
Download (7.73MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121261
Abstract
Nanocelluloses have attracted significant interest in the field of bioprinting, with previous research outlining the value of nanocellulose fibrils and bacterial nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting tissues such as cartilage. We have recently characterised three distinct structural formulations of pulp...
Published in: | Carbohydrate Polymers |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0144-8617 1879-1344 |
Published: |
Elsevier BV
2023
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa64062 |
first_indexed |
2023-08-09T08:47:13Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2024-11-25T14:13:22Z |
id |
cronfa64062 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2024-02-02T08:24:15.8300598</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>64062</id><entry>2023-08-09</entry><title>A comparative analysis of pulp-derived nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting facial cartilages</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7d95ed2bceb18fc0fdfd4048277c6eed</sid><firstname>Thomas</firstname><surname>Jovic</surname><name>Thomas Jovic</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>ed7371c768e9746008a6807f9f7a1555</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-9790-0907</ORCID><firstname>Hari</firstname><surname>Arora</surname><name>Hari Arora</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>8f70286908f67238a527a98cbf66d387</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-6753-1987</ORCID><firstname>Shareen</firstname><surname>Doak</surname><name>Shareen Doak</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>830074c59291938a55b480dcbee4697e</sid><ORCID/><firstname>Iain</firstname><surname>Whitaker</surname><name>Iain Whitaker</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2023-08-09</date><deptcode>MEDS</deptcode><abstract>Nanocelluloses have attracted significant interest in the field of bioprinting, with previous research outlining the value of nanocellulose fibrils and bacterial nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting tissues such as cartilage. We have recently characterised three distinct structural formulations of pulp-derived nanocelluloses: fibrillar (NFC), crystalline (NCC) and blend (NCB), exhibiting variation in pore geometry and mechanical properties. In light of the characterisation of these three distinct entities, this study investigated whether these structural differences translated to differences in printability, chondrogenicity or biocompatibility for 3D bioprinting anatomical structures with human nasoseptal chondrocytes. Composite nanocellulose-alginate bioinks (75:25 v/v) of NFC, NCC and NCB were produced and tested for print resolution and fidelity. NFC offered superior print resolution whereas NCB demonstrated the best post-printing shape fidelity. Biologically, chondrogenicity was assessed using real time quantitative PCR, dimethylmethylene blue assays and histology. All biomaterials showed an increase in chondrogenic gene expression and extracellular matrix production over 21 days, but this was superior in the NCC bioink. Biocompatibility assessments revealed an increase in cell number and metabolism over 21 days in the NCC and NCB formulations. Nanocellulose augments printability and chondrogenicity of bioinks, of which the NCC and NCB formulations offer the best biological promise for bioprinting cartilage.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Carbohydrate Polymers</journal><volume>321</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>121261</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0144-8617</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1879-1344</issnElectronic><keywords>Cartilage, Bioprinting, Nanocellulose, Alginate</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-12-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121261</doi><url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121261</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Medical School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>MEDS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal)</apcterm><funders>This study was supported by The Scar Free Foundation & Health and Care Research Wales Programme of research in Reconstructive Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, which has been established in the ReconRegen Research Centre at Swansea University in partnership with Swansea Bay University Health Board. This work was additionally supported by Action Medical Research and the VTCT Foundation (Grant Number 2782), the Royal College of Surgeons England and the Welsh Clinical Academic Training Programme.</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-02-02T08:24:15.8300598</lastEdited><Created>2023-08-09T09:44:38.1164207</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">Swansea University Medical School - Biomedical Science</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Thomas</firstname><surname>Jovic</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Tamsin</firstname><surname>Nicholson</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Hari</firstname><surname>Arora</surname><orcid>0000-0002-9790-0907</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Kim</firstname><surname>Nelson</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Shareen</firstname><surname>Doak</surname><orcid>0000-0002-6753-1987</orcid><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Iain</firstname><surname>Whitaker</surname><orcid/><order>6</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>64062__28293__42889230bcd446c384adc224b02049e8.pdf</filename><originalFilename>64062.VOR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2023-08-14T11:01:54.2490583</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>8103164</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2024-02-02T08:24:15.8300598 v2 64062 2023-08-09 A comparative analysis of pulp-derived nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting facial cartilages 7d95ed2bceb18fc0fdfd4048277c6eed Thomas Jovic Thomas Jovic true false ed7371c768e9746008a6807f9f7a1555 0000-0002-9790-0907 Hari Arora Hari Arora true false 8f70286908f67238a527a98cbf66d387 0000-0002-6753-1987 Shareen Doak Shareen Doak true false 830074c59291938a55b480dcbee4697e Iain Whitaker Iain Whitaker true false 2023-08-09 MEDS Nanocelluloses have attracted significant interest in the field of bioprinting, with previous research outlining the value of nanocellulose fibrils and bacterial nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting tissues such as cartilage. We have recently characterised three distinct structural formulations of pulp-derived nanocelluloses: fibrillar (NFC), crystalline (NCC) and blend (NCB), exhibiting variation in pore geometry and mechanical properties. In light of the characterisation of these three distinct entities, this study investigated whether these structural differences translated to differences in printability, chondrogenicity or biocompatibility for 3D bioprinting anatomical structures with human nasoseptal chondrocytes. Composite nanocellulose-alginate bioinks (75:25 v/v) of NFC, NCC and NCB were produced and tested for print resolution and fidelity. NFC offered superior print resolution whereas NCB demonstrated the best post-printing shape fidelity. Biologically, chondrogenicity was assessed using real time quantitative PCR, dimethylmethylene blue assays and histology. All biomaterials showed an increase in chondrogenic gene expression and extracellular matrix production over 21 days, but this was superior in the NCC bioink. Biocompatibility assessments revealed an increase in cell number and metabolism over 21 days in the NCC and NCB formulations. Nanocellulose augments printability and chondrogenicity of bioinks, of which the NCC and NCB formulations offer the best biological promise for bioprinting cartilage. Journal Article Carbohydrate Polymers 321 121261 Elsevier BV 0144-8617 1879-1344 Cartilage, Bioprinting, Nanocellulose, Alginate 1 12 2023 2023-12-01 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121261 COLLEGE NANME Medical School COLLEGE CODE MEDS Swansea University SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal) This study was supported by The Scar Free Foundation & Health and Care Research Wales Programme of research in Reconstructive Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, which has been established in the ReconRegen Research Centre at Swansea University in partnership with Swansea Bay University Health Board. This work was additionally supported by Action Medical Research and the VTCT Foundation (Grant Number 2782), the Royal College of Surgeons England and the Welsh Clinical Academic Training Programme. 2024-02-02T08:24:15.8300598 2023-08-09T09:44:38.1164207 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Swansea University Medical School - Biomedical Science Thomas Jovic 1 Tamsin Nicholson 2 Hari Arora 0000-0002-9790-0907 3 Kim Nelson 4 Shareen Doak 0000-0002-6753-1987 5 Iain Whitaker 6 64062__28293__42889230bcd446c384adc224b02049e8.pdf 64062.VOR.pdf 2023-08-14T11:01:54.2490583 Output 8103164 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0). true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
A comparative analysis of pulp-derived nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting facial cartilages |
spellingShingle |
A comparative analysis of pulp-derived nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting facial cartilages Thomas Jovic Hari Arora Shareen Doak Iain Whitaker |
title_short |
A comparative analysis of pulp-derived nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting facial cartilages |
title_full |
A comparative analysis of pulp-derived nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting facial cartilages |
title_fullStr |
A comparative analysis of pulp-derived nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting facial cartilages |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative analysis of pulp-derived nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting facial cartilages |
title_sort |
A comparative analysis of pulp-derived nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting facial cartilages |
author_id_str_mv |
7d95ed2bceb18fc0fdfd4048277c6eed ed7371c768e9746008a6807f9f7a1555 8f70286908f67238a527a98cbf66d387 830074c59291938a55b480dcbee4697e |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
7d95ed2bceb18fc0fdfd4048277c6eed_***_Thomas Jovic ed7371c768e9746008a6807f9f7a1555_***_Hari Arora 8f70286908f67238a527a98cbf66d387_***_Shareen Doak 830074c59291938a55b480dcbee4697e_***_Iain Whitaker |
author |
Thomas Jovic Hari Arora Shareen Doak Iain Whitaker |
author2 |
Thomas Jovic Tamsin Nicholson Hari Arora Kim Nelson Shareen Doak Iain Whitaker |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Carbohydrate Polymers |
container_volume |
321 |
container_start_page |
121261 |
publishDate |
2023 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0144-8617 1879-1344 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121261 |
publisher |
Elsevier BV |
college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
department_str |
Swansea University Medical School - Biomedical Science{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Swansea University Medical School - Biomedical Science |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121261 |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Nanocelluloses have attracted significant interest in the field of bioprinting, with previous research outlining the value of nanocellulose fibrils and bacterial nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting tissues such as cartilage. We have recently characterised three distinct structural formulations of pulp-derived nanocelluloses: fibrillar (NFC), crystalline (NCC) and blend (NCB), exhibiting variation in pore geometry and mechanical properties. In light of the characterisation of these three distinct entities, this study investigated whether these structural differences translated to differences in printability, chondrogenicity or biocompatibility for 3D bioprinting anatomical structures with human nasoseptal chondrocytes. Composite nanocellulose-alginate bioinks (75:25 v/v) of NFC, NCC and NCB were produced and tested for print resolution and fidelity. NFC offered superior print resolution whereas NCB demonstrated the best post-printing shape fidelity. Biologically, chondrogenicity was assessed using real time quantitative PCR, dimethylmethylene blue assays and histology. All biomaterials showed an increase in chondrogenic gene expression and extracellular matrix production over 21 days, but this was superior in the NCC bioink. Biocompatibility assessments revealed an increase in cell number and metabolism over 21 days in the NCC and NCB formulations. Nanocellulose augments printability and chondrogenicity of bioinks, of which the NCC and NCB formulations offer the best biological promise for bioprinting cartilage. |
published_date |
2023-12-01T02:41:23Z |
_version_ |
1821371566158512128 |
score |
11.04748 |