No Cover Image

Journal article 928 views 118 downloads

Testing the theory of Differential Susceptibility to nightmares: The interaction of Sensory Processing Sensitivity with the relationship of low mental wellbeing to nightmare frequency and nightmare distress

Michelle Carr Orcid Logo, Eve Matthews, Jessica Williams, Mark Blagrove Orcid Logo

Journal of Sleep Research, Volume: 30, Issue: 3, Start page: 13200

Swansea University Authors: Michelle Carr Orcid Logo, Mark Blagrove Orcid Logo

  • Carr_Blagrove_2020_JSR_13200.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2020 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY) License

    Download (307.72KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1111/jsr.13200

Abstract

Propensity to have nightmares has been theorisd in terms of diathesis–stress models, with this propensity being seen as negative or even pathological. In contrast, a recent model proposes that nightmare propensity is due to Differential Susceptibility to stimuli, where high susceptibility can be ben...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Sleep Research
ISSN: 0962-1105 1365-2869
Published: Wiley 2021
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa55628
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2020-11-09T12:22:52Z
last_indexed 2023-01-11T14:34:20Z
id cronfa55628
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-10-25T15:29:31.7228608</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>55628</id><entry>2020-11-09</entry><title>Testing the theory of Differential Susceptibility to nightmares: The interaction of Sensory Processing Sensitivity with the relationship of low mental wellbeing to nightmare frequency and nightmare distress</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>892af5142bbe0a6c3dbb1f26f325ab02</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-0399-0196</ORCID><firstname>Michelle</firstname><surname>Carr</surname><name>Michelle Carr</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>8c78ee008e650b9f0a463bae56a5636c</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-9854-1854</ORCID><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Blagrove</surname><name>Mark Blagrove</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2020-11-09</date><deptcode>HPS</deptcode><abstract>Propensity to have nightmares has been theorisd in terms of diathesis&#x2013;stress models, with this propensity being seen as negative or even pathological. In contrast, a recent model proposes that nightmare propensity is due to Differential Susceptibility to stimuli, where high susceptibility can be beneficial in positive environments but detrimental in negative environments. This susceptibility to stimuli is assessed as the biobehavioural trait Sensory Processing Sensitivity, which refers to a greater responsivity to internal and external stimuli, and an increased depth of cognitive and emotional processing. To test the Differential Susceptibility Framework for nightmares, 137 participants (females = 104, males = 33; mean age = 33.66 years), recruitedfrom a student population and social media sites, were divided into high(n = 39), medium (n = 59) and low (n = 39) Sensory Processing Sensitivity categories based on their score on the Highly Sensitive Person Scale. Low mental wellbeing and the presence of minor psychiatric problems, measured by the General Health Questionnaire, was found to be significantly correlated with nightmare frequency for the high and medium SPS groups (rs = .29 and .28, respectively), but not for the low Sensory Processing Sensitivity group (r = .19). General Health Questionnaire score was also significantly correlated with trait nightmare distress, for the high Sensory Processing Sensitivity group only (r = .32). These findings in favour of the Differential Susceptibility Framework have aetiology and treatment implications for nightmares that differ from diathesis&#x2013;stress models.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Sleep Research</journal><volume>30</volume><journalNumber>3</journalNumber><paginationStart>13200</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Wiley</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0962-1105</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1365-2869</issnElectronic><keywords>differential sensitivity; nightmares; personality; vantage sensitivity</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-06-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1111/jsr.13200</doi><url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13200</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal)</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-10-25T15:29:31.7228608</lastEdited><Created>2020-11-09T12:09:41.7619005</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Michelle</firstname><surname>Carr</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0399-0196</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Eve</firstname><surname>Matthews</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Jessica</firstname><surname>Williams</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Blagrove</surname><orcid>0000-0002-9854-1854</orcid><order>4</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>55628__18614__5bd7c5aa2fb14cf799c3a1d50adbb5b7.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Carr_Blagrove_2020_JSR_13200.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2020-11-09T12:21:52.0735009</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>315102</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>&#xA9; 2020 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY) License</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-10-25T15:29:31.7228608 v2 55628 2020-11-09 Testing the theory of Differential Susceptibility to nightmares: The interaction of Sensory Processing Sensitivity with the relationship of low mental wellbeing to nightmare frequency and nightmare distress 892af5142bbe0a6c3dbb1f26f325ab02 0000-0003-0399-0196 Michelle Carr Michelle Carr true false 8c78ee008e650b9f0a463bae56a5636c 0000-0002-9854-1854 Mark Blagrove Mark Blagrove true false 2020-11-09 HPS Propensity to have nightmares has been theorisd in terms of diathesis–stress models, with this propensity being seen as negative or even pathological. In contrast, a recent model proposes that nightmare propensity is due to Differential Susceptibility to stimuli, where high susceptibility can be beneficial in positive environments but detrimental in negative environments. This susceptibility to stimuli is assessed as the biobehavioural trait Sensory Processing Sensitivity, which refers to a greater responsivity to internal and external stimuli, and an increased depth of cognitive and emotional processing. To test the Differential Susceptibility Framework for nightmares, 137 participants (females = 104, males = 33; mean age = 33.66 years), recruitedfrom a student population and social media sites, were divided into high(n = 39), medium (n = 59) and low (n = 39) Sensory Processing Sensitivity categories based on their score on the Highly Sensitive Person Scale. Low mental wellbeing and the presence of minor psychiatric problems, measured by the General Health Questionnaire, was found to be significantly correlated with nightmare frequency for the high and medium SPS groups (rs = .29 and .28, respectively), but not for the low Sensory Processing Sensitivity group (r = .19). General Health Questionnaire score was also significantly correlated with trait nightmare distress, for the high Sensory Processing Sensitivity group only (r = .32). These findings in favour of the Differential Susceptibility Framework have aetiology and treatment implications for nightmares that differ from diathesis–stress models. Journal Article Journal of Sleep Research 30 3 13200 Wiley 0962-1105 1365-2869 differential sensitivity; nightmares; personality; vantage sensitivity 1 6 2021 2021-06-01 10.1111/jsr.13200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13200 COLLEGE NANME Psychology COLLEGE CODE HPS Swansea University SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal) 2022-10-25T15:29:31.7228608 2020-11-09T12:09:41.7619005 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Michelle Carr 0000-0003-0399-0196 1 Eve Matthews 2 Jessica Williams 3 Mark Blagrove 0000-0002-9854-1854 4 55628__18614__5bd7c5aa2fb14cf799c3a1d50adbb5b7.pdf Carr_Blagrove_2020_JSR_13200.pdf 2020-11-09T12:21:52.0735009 Output 315102 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2020 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY) License true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Testing the theory of Differential Susceptibility to nightmares: The interaction of Sensory Processing Sensitivity with the relationship of low mental wellbeing to nightmare frequency and nightmare distress
spellingShingle Testing the theory of Differential Susceptibility to nightmares: The interaction of Sensory Processing Sensitivity with the relationship of low mental wellbeing to nightmare frequency and nightmare distress
Michelle Carr
Mark Blagrove
title_short Testing the theory of Differential Susceptibility to nightmares: The interaction of Sensory Processing Sensitivity with the relationship of low mental wellbeing to nightmare frequency and nightmare distress
title_full Testing the theory of Differential Susceptibility to nightmares: The interaction of Sensory Processing Sensitivity with the relationship of low mental wellbeing to nightmare frequency and nightmare distress
title_fullStr Testing the theory of Differential Susceptibility to nightmares: The interaction of Sensory Processing Sensitivity with the relationship of low mental wellbeing to nightmare frequency and nightmare distress
title_full_unstemmed Testing the theory of Differential Susceptibility to nightmares: The interaction of Sensory Processing Sensitivity with the relationship of low mental wellbeing to nightmare frequency and nightmare distress
title_sort Testing the theory of Differential Susceptibility to nightmares: The interaction of Sensory Processing Sensitivity with the relationship of low mental wellbeing to nightmare frequency and nightmare distress
author_id_str_mv 892af5142bbe0a6c3dbb1f26f325ab02
8c78ee008e650b9f0a463bae56a5636c
author_id_fullname_str_mv 892af5142bbe0a6c3dbb1f26f325ab02_***_Michelle Carr
8c78ee008e650b9f0a463bae56a5636c_***_Mark Blagrove
author Michelle Carr
Mark Blagrove
author2 Michelle Carr
Eve Matthews
Jessica Williams
Mark Blagrove
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Sleep Research
container_volume 30
container_issue 3
container_start_page 13200
publishDate 2021
institution Swansea University
issn 0962-1105
1365-2869
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jsr.13200
publisher Wiley
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13200
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Propensity to have nightmares has been theorisd in terms of diathesis–stress models, with this propensity being seen as negative or even pathological. In contrast, a recent model proposes that nightmare propensity is due to Differential Susceptibility to stimuli, where high susceptibility can be beneficial in positive environments but detrimental in negative environments. This susceptibility to stimuli is assessed as the biobehavioural trait Sensory Processing Sensitivity, which refers to a greater responsivity to internal and external stimuli, and an increased depth of cognitive and emotional processing. To test the Differential Susceptibility Framework for nightmares, 137 participants (females = 104, males = 33; mean age = 33.66 years), recruitedfrom a student population and social media sites, were divided into high(n = 39), medium (n = 59) and low (n = 39) Sensory Processing Sensitivity categories based on their score on the Highly Sensitive Person Scale. Low mental wellbeing and the presence of minor psychiatric problems, measured by the General Health Questionnaire, was found to be significantly correlated with nightmare frequency for the high and medium SPS groups (rs = .29 and .28, respectively), but not for the low Sensory Processing Sensitivity group (r = .19). General Health Questionnaire score was also significantly correlated with trait nightmare distress, for the high Sensory Processing Sensitivity group only (r = .32). These findings in favour of the Differential Susceptibility Framework have aetiology and treatment implications for nightmares that differ from diathesis–stress models.
published_date 2021-06-01T04:09:59Z
_version_ 1763753695098437632
score 11.013148

Similar Items