No Cover Image

Journal article 1393 views

A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance

Mark Russell, Aden King, Richard Bracken Orcid Logo, Christian. J. Cook, Thibault Giroud, Liam. P. Kilduff

International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, Volume: 11, Issue: 6, Pages: 763 - 767

Swansea University Author: Richard Bracken Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0508

Abstract

Purpose:To assess the effects of different modes of morning (AM) exercise on afternoon (PM) performance and salivary hormone responses in professional rugby union players.Methods:On 4 occasions (randomized, crossover design), 15 professional rugby players provided AM (~8 AM) and PM (~2 PM) saliva sa...

Full description

Published in: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
ISSN: 1555-0265 1555-0273
Published: 2016
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa50342
first_indexed 2019-05-14T14:00:17Z
last_indexed 2019-08-15T21:26:16Z
id cronfa50342
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-08-15T16:26:53.0875132</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>50342</id><entry>2019-05-14</entry><title>A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>f5da81cd18adfdedb2ccb845bddc12f7</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-6986-6449</ORCID><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Bracken</surname><name>Richard Bracken</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-05-14</date><deptcode>EAAS</deptcode><abstract>Purpose:To assess the effects of different modes of morning (AM) exercise on afternoon (PM) performance and salivary hormone responses in professional rugby union players.Methods:On 4 occasions (randomized, crossover design), 15 professional rugby players provided AM (~8 AM) and PM (~2 PM) saliva samples before PM assessments of countermovement-jump height, reaction time, and repeated-sprint ability. Control (passive rest), weights (bench press: 5 &#xD7; 10 repetitions, 75% 1-repetition maximum, 90-s intraset recovery), cycling (6 &#xD7; 6-s maximal sprint cycling, 7.5% body mass load, 54-s intraset recovery), and running (6 &#xD7; 40-m maximal sprints, 20-s intraset recovery) interventions preceded (~5 h) PM testing.Results:PM sprint performance improved (P &lt; .05) after weights (&gt;0.15 &#xB1; 0.19 s, &gt;2.04% &#xB1; 2.46%) and running (&gt;0.15 &#xB1; 0.17 s, &gt;2.12% &#xB1; 2.22%) but not cycling (P &gt; .05). PM jump height increased after cycling (0.012 &#xB1; 0.009 m, 2.31% &#xB1; 1.76%, P &lt; .001) and running (0.020 &#xB1; 0.009 m, 3.90% &#xB1; 1.79%, P &lt; .001) but not weights (P = .936). Reaction time remained unchanged between trials (P = .379). Relative to control (131 &#xB1; 21 pg/mL), PM testosterone was greater in weights (21 &#xB1; 23 pg/mL, 17% &#xB1; 18%, P = .002) and running (28 &#xB1; 26 pg/mL, 22% &#xB1; 20%, P = .001) but not cycling (P = .072). Salivary cortisol was unaffected by AM exercise (P = .540).Conclusions:All modes of AM exercise improved at least 1 marker of PM performance, but running appeared the most beneficial to professional rugby union players. A rationale therefore exists for preceding PM competition with AM exercise.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance</journal><volume>11</volume><journalNumber>6</journalNumber><paginationStart>763</paginationStart><paginationEnd>767</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>1555-0265</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1555-0273</issnElectronic><keywords>ergogenic, potentiation, hormone, rugby</keywords><publishedDay>30</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2016</publishedYear><publishedDate>2016-09-30</publishedDate><doi>10.1123/ijspp.2015-0508</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Engineering and Applied Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>EAAS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-08-15T16:26:53.0875132</lastEdited><Created>2019-05-14T10:15:34.9320321</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Russell</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Aden</firstname><surname>King</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Bracken</surname><orcid>0000-0002-6986-6449</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Christian. J.</firstname><surname>Cook</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Thibault</firstname><surname>Giroud</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Liam. P.</firstname><surname>Kilduff</surname><order>6</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-08-15T16:26:53.0875132 v2 50342 2019-05-14 A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance f5da81cd18adfdedb2ccb845bddc12f7 0000-0002-6986-6449 Richard Bracken Richard Bracken true false 2019-05-14 EAAS Purpose:To assess the effects of different modes of morning (AM) exercise on afternoon (PM) performance and salivary hormone responses in professional rugby union players.Methods:On 4 occasions (randomized, crossover design), 15 professional rugby players provided AM (~8 AM) and PM (~2 PM) saliva samples before PM assessments of countermovement-jump height, reaction time, and repeated-sprint ability. Control (passive rest), weights (bench press: 5 × 10 repetitions, 75% 1-repetition maximum, 90-s intraset recovery), cycling (6 × 6-s maximal sprint cycling, 7.5% body mass load, 54-s intraset recovery), and running (6 × 40-m maximal sprints, 20-s intraset recovery) interventions preceded (~5 h) PM testing.Results:PM sprint performance improved (P < .05) after weights (>0.15 ± 0.19 s, >2.04% ± 2.46%) and running (>0.15 ± 0.17 s, >2.12% ± 2.22%) but not cycling (P > .05). PM jump height increased after cycling (0.012 ± 0.009 m, 2.31% ± 1.76%, P < .001) and running (0.020 ± 0.009 m, 3.90% ± 1.79%, P < .001) but not weights (P = .936). Reaction time remained unchanged between trials (P = .379). Relative to control (131 ± 21 pg/mL), PM testosterone was greater in weights (21 ± 23 pg/mL, 17% ± 18%, P = .002) and running (28 ± 26 pg/mL, 22% ± 20%, P = .001) but not cycling (P = .072). Salivary cortisol was unaffected by AM exercise (P = .540).Conclusions:All modes of AM exercise improved at least 1 marker of PM performance, but running appeared the most beneficial to professional rugby union players. A rationale therefore exists for preceding PM competition with AM exercise. Journal Article International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 11 6 763 767 1555-0265 1555-0273 ergogenic, potentiation, hormone, rugby 30 9 2016 2016-09-30 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0508 COLLEGE NANME Engineering and Applied Sciences School COLLEGE CODE EAAS Swansea University 2019-08-15T16:26:53.0875132 2019-05-14T10:15:34.9320321 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences Mark Russell 1 Aden King 2 Richard Bracken 0000-0002-6986-6449 3 Christian. J. Cook 4 Thibault Giroud 5 Liam. P. Kilduff 6
title A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance
spellingShingle A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance
Richard Bracken
title_short A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance
title_full A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance
title_fullStr A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance
title_sort A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance
author_id_str_mv f5da81cd18adfdedb2ccb845bddc12f7
author_id_fullname_str_mv f5da81cd18adfdedb2ccb845bddc12f7_***_Richard Bracken
author Richard Bracken
author2 Mark Russell
Aden King
Richard Bracken
Christian. J. Cook
Thibault Giroud
Liam. P. Kilduff
format Journal article
container_title International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
container_volume 11
container_issue 6
container_start_page 763
publishDate 2016
institution Swansea University
issn 1555-0265
1555-0273
doi_str_mv 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0508
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Purpose:To assess the effects of different modes of morning (AM) exercise on afternoon (PM) performance and salivary hormone responses in professional rugby union players.Methods:On 4 occasions (randomized, crossover design), 15 professional rugby players provided AM (~8 AM) and PM (~2 PM) saliva samples before PM assessments of countermovement-jump height, reaction time, and repeated-sprint ability. Control (passive rest), weights (bench press: 5 × 10 repetitions, 75% 1-repetition maximum, 90-s intraset recovery), cycling (6 × 6-s maximal sprint cycling, 7.5% body mass load, 54-s intraset recovery), and running (6 × 40-m maximal sprints, 20-s intraset recovery) interventions preceded (~5 h) PM testing.Results:PM sprint performance improved (P < .05) after weights (>0.15 ± 0.19 s, >2.04% ± 2.46%) and running (>0.15 ± 0.17 s, >2.12% ± 2.22%) but not cycling (P > .05). PM jump height increased after cycling (0.012 ± 0.009 m, 2.31% ± 1.76%, P < .001) and running (0.020 ± 0.009 m, 3.90% ± 1.79%, P < .001) but not weights (P = .936). Reaction time remained unchanged between trials (P = .379). Relative to control (131 ± 21 pg/mL), PM testosterone was greater in weights (21 ± 23 pg/mL, 17% ± 18%, P = .002) and running (28 ± 26 pg/mL, 22% ± 20%, P = .001) but not cycling (P = .072). Salivary cortisol was unaffected by AM exercise (P = .540).Conclusions:All modes of AM exercise improved at least 1 marker of PM performance, but running appeared the most beneficial to professional rugby union players. A rationale therefore exists for preceding PM competition with AM exercise.
published_date 2016-09-30T07:44:40Z
_version_ 1821390647538483200
score 11.047501

Similar Items