No Cover Image

Journal article 1149 views

A Comparison of Different Modes of Morning Priming Exercise on Afternoon Performance

Mark Russell, Aden King, Richard Bracken Orcid Logo, Christian. J. Cook, Thibault Giroud, Liam. P. Kilduff

International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, Volume: 11, Issue: 6, Pages: 763 - 767

Swansea University Author: Richard Bracken Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Abstract

Purpose:To assess the effects of different modes of morning (AM) exercise on afternoon (PM) performance and salivary hormone responses in professional rugby union players.Methods:On 4 occasions (randomized, crossover design), 15 professional rugby players provided AM (~8 AM) and PM (~2 PM) saliva sa...

Full description

Published in: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
ISSN: 1555-0265 1555-0273
Published: 2016
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa50342
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: Purpose:To assess the effects of different modes of morning (AM) exercise on afternoon (PM) performance and salivary hormone responses in professional rugby union players.Methods:On 4 occasions (randomized, crossover design), 15 professional rugby players provided AM (~8 AM) and PM (~2 PM) saliva samples before PM assessments of countermovement-jump height, reaction time, and repeated-sprint ability. Control (passive rest), weights (bench press: 5 × 10 repetitions, 75% 1-repetition maximum, 90-s intraset recovery), cycling (6 × 6-s maximal sprint cycling, 7.5% body mass load, 54-s intraset recovery), and running (6 × 40-m maximal sprints, 20-s intraset recovery) interventions preceded (~5 h) PM testing.Results:PM sprint performance improved (P < .05) after weights (>0.15 ± 0.19 s, >2.04% ± 2.46%) and running (>0.15 ± 0.17 s, >2.12% ± 2.22%) but not cycling (P > .05). PM jump height increased after cycling (0.012 ± 0.009 m, 2.31% ± 1.76%, P < .001) and running (0.020 ± 0.009 m, 3.90% ± 1.79%, P < .001) but not weights (P = .936). Reaction time remained unchanged between trials (P = .379). Relative to control (131 ± 21 pg/mL), PM testosterone was greater in weights (21 ± 23 pg/mL, 17% ± 18%, P = .002) and running (28 ± 26 pg/mL, 22% ± 20%, P = .001) but not cycling (P = .072). Salivary cortisol was unaffected by AM exercise (P = .540).Conclusions:All modes of AM exercise improved at least 1 marker of PM performance, but running appeared the most beneficial to professional rugby union players. A rationale therefore exists for preceding PM competition with AM exercise.
Keywords: ergogenic, potentiation, hormone, rugby
College: Faculty of Science and Engineering
Issue: 6
Start Page: 763
End Page: 767