Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract 1385 views
A computational method of obtaining reliable measurement of periosteal cross-sectional area of human radii from laser scans
Proceedings of the 23rd UK Conference of the Association for Computational Mechanics in Engineering, Volume: 23, Pages: 73 - 76
Swansea University Author:
Nicholas Owen
Abstract
ABSTRACTThe accurate quantification of bones cross-sectional geometry provides valuable information about mechanical properties of bones such as rigidity to torsional, bending and compressive loading and also reveals insights into habitual activities of humans in the past. However, the use of curren...
Published in: | Proceedings of the 23rd UK Conference of the Association for Computational Mechanics in Engineering |
---|---|
Published: |
Swansea
2015
|
Online Access: |
http://eng-intranet-web.swan.ac.uk/acme2015/ACMEUK2015.pdf |
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa20806 |
first_indexed |
2015-04-21T02:07:34Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2018-02-09T04:57:44Z |
id |
cronfa20806 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2015-04-24T16:12:26.1181636</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>20806</id><entry>2015-04-20</entry><title>A computational method of obtaining reliable measurement of periosteal cross-sectional area of human radii from laser scans</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>360b7822fd760c7d73a1b0ca5bce1c07</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-7067-8082</ORCID><firstname>Nicholas</firstname><surname>Owen</surname><name>Nicholas Owen</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2015-04-20</date><deptcode>EAAS</deptcode><abstract>ABSTRACTThe accurate quantification of bones cross-sectional geometry provides valuable information about mechanical properties of bones such as rigidity to torsional, bending and compressive loading and also reveals insights into habitual activities of humans in the past. However, the use of current methods can produce large errors between measured and true cross-sectional areas. In this study the minimum cross sectional area was calculated at mid-shaft for a unique collection of laser scanned radii bones, recovered from Mary Rose warship, using a novel technique. A computational method was used to measure multiple cross-sectional areas for different orientations to then determine a minimum. This was then taken to represent a reliable mid-shaft cross-sectional area. The reliability of the process was tested using Bland and Altman plots to analyse the agreement between measurement trials. The systematic bias between the two measurement trials was 0.06mm2 (0.04% of the average cross-sectional area measurement) with 95% limits of agreement of 1.69mm2 (1.13%) and -1.57mm2 (1.05%). Consequently this method can be used as a reliable measure of periosteal cross-sectional area. The possibility also exists to transfer the methods described here to other imaging technologies for example, micro CT and magnetic resonance imaging. This would augment existing methods of computational analysis and produce accurate models.Keywords: computational modelling, bone topology, osteology, biomechanics</abstract><type>Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract</type><journal>Proceedings of the 23rd UK Conference of the Association for Computational Mechanics in Engineering</journal><volume>23</volume><paginationStart>73</paginationStart><paginationEnd>76</paginationEnd><publisher/><placeOfPublication>Swansea</placeOfPublication><keywords>computational modelling, bone topology, osteology, biomechanics</keywords><publishedDay>10</publishedDay><publishedMonth>4</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2015</publishedYear><publishedDate>2015-04-10</publishedDate><doi/><url>http://eng-intranet-web.swan.ac.uk/acme2015/ACMEUK2015.pdf</url><notes></notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Engineering and Applied Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>EAAS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2015-04-24T16:12:26.1181636</lastEdited><Created>2015-04-20T18:18:06.4117186</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Nicholas</firstname><surname>Owen</surname><orcid>0000-0002-7067-8082</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Pooya</firstname><surname>Mahmoodi</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Annan</firstname><surname>Simon</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2015-04-24T16:12:26.1181636 v2 20806 2015-04-20 A computational method of obtaining reliable measurement of periosteal cross-sectional area of human radii from laser scans 360b7822fd760c7d73a1b0ca5bce1c07 0000-0002-7067-8082 Nicholas Owen Nicholas Owen true false 2015-04-20 EAAS ABSTRACTThe accurate quantification of bones cross-sectional geometry provides valuable information about mechanical properties of bones such as rigidity to torsional, bending and compressive loading and also reveals insights into habitual activities of humans in the past. However, the use of current methods can produce large errors between measured and true cross-sectional areas. In this study the minimum cross sectional area was calculated at mid-shaft for a unique collection of laser scanned radii bones, recovered from Mary Rose warship, using a novel technique. A computational method was used to measure multiple cross-sectional areas for different orientations to then determine a minimum. This was then taken to represent a reliable mid-shaft cross-sectional area. The reliability of the process was tested using Bland and Altman plots to analyse the agreement between measurement trials. The systematic bias between the two measurement trials was 0.06mm2 (0.04% of the average cross-sectional area measurement) with 95% limits of agreement of 1.69mm2 (1.13%) and -1.57mm2 (1.05%). Consequently this method can be used as a reliable measure of periosteal cross-sectional area. The possibility also exists to transfer the methods described here to other imaging technologies for example, micro CT and magnetic resonance imaging. This would augment existing methods of computational analysis and produce accurate models.Keywords: computational modelling, bone topology, osteology, biomechanics Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract Proceedings of the 23rd UK Conference of the Association for Computational Mechanics in Engineering 23 73 76 Swansea computational modelling, bone topology, osteology, biomechanics 10 4 2015 2015-04-10 http://eng-intranet-web.swan.ac.uk/acme2015/ACMEUK2015.pdf COLLEGE NANME Engineering and Applied Sciences School COLLEGE CODE EAAS Swansea University 2015-04-24T16:12:26.1181636 2015-04-20T18:18:06.4117186 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences Nicholas Owen 0000-0002-7067-8082 1 Pooya Mahmoodi 2 Annan Simon 3 |
title |
A computational method of obtaining reliable measurement of periosteal cross-sectional area of human radii from laser scans |
spellingShingle |
A computational method of obtaining reliable measurement of periosteal cross-sectional area of human radii from laser scans Nicholas Owen |
title_short |
A computational method of obtaining reliable measurement of periosteal cross-sectional area of human radii from laser scans |
title_full |
A computational method of obtaining reliable measurement of periosteal cross-sectional area of human radii from laser scans |
title_fullStr |
A computational method of obtaining reliable measurement of periosteal cross-sectional area of human radii from laser scans |
title_full_unstemmed |
A computational method of obtaining reliable measurement of periosteal cross-sectional area of human radii from laser scans |
title_sort |
A computational method of obtaining reliable measurement of periosteal cross-sectional area of human radii from laser scans |
author_id_str_mv |
360b7822fd760c7d73a1b0ca5bce1c07 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
360b7822fd760c7d73a1b0ca5bce1c07_***_Nicholas Owen |
author |
Nicholas Owen |
author2 |
Nicholas Owen Pooya Mahmoodi Annan Simon |
format |
Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract |
container_title |
Proceedings of the 23rd UK Conference of the Association for Computational Mechanics in Engineering |
container_volume |
23 |
container_start_page |
73 |
publishDate |
2015 |
institution |
Swansea University |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences |
url |
http://eng-intranet-web.swan.ac.uk/acme2015/ACMEUK2015.pdf |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
ABSTRACTThe accurate quantification of bones cross-sectional geometry provides valuable information about mechanical properties of bones such as rigidity to torsional, bending and compressive loading and also reveals insights into habitual activities of humans in the past. However, the use of current methods can produce large errors between measured and true cross-sectional areas. In this study the minimum cross sectional area was calculated at mid-shaft for a unique collection of laser scanned radii bones, recovered from Mary Rose warship, using a novel technique. A computational method was used to measure multiple cross-sectional areas for different orientations to then determine a minimum. This was then taken to represent a reliable mid-shaft cross-sectional area. The reliability of the process was tested using Bland and Altman plots to analyse the agreement between measurement trials. The systematic bias between the two measurement trials was 0.06mm2 (0.04% of the average cross-sectional area measurement) with 95% limits of agreement of 1.69mm2 (1.13%) and -1.57mm2 (1.05%). Consequently this method can be used as a reliable measure of periosteal cross-sectional area. The possibility also exists to transfer the methods described here to other imaging technologies for example, micro CT and magnetic resonance imaging. This would augment existing methods of computational analysis and produce accurate models.Keywords: computational modelling, bone topology, osteology, biomechanics |
published_date |
2015-04-10T06:35:56Z |
_version_ |
1826822141308305408 |
score |
11.056336 |