Journal article 1529 views 1136 downloads
Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity
Tim Newbold,
Lawrence N. Hudson,
Samantha L. L. Hill,
Sara Contu,
Igor Lysenko,
Rebecca A. Senior,
Luca Borger 
,
Dominic J. Bennett,
Argyrios Choimes,
Ben Collen,
Julie Day,
Adriana De Palma,
Sandra Díaz,
Susy Echeverria-Londoño,
Melanie J. Edgar,
Anat Feldman,
Morgan Garon,
Michelle L. K. Harrison,
Tamera Alhusseini,
Daniel J. Ingram,
Yuval Itescu,
Jens Kattge,
Victoria Kemp,
Lucinda Kirkpatrick,
Michael Kleyer,
David Laginha Pinto Correia,
Callum D. Martin,
Shai Meiri,
Maria Novosolov,
Yuan Pan,
Helen R. P. Phillips,
Drew W. Purves,
Alexandra Robinson,
Jake Simpson,
Sean L. Tuck,
Evan Weiher,
Hannah J. White,
Robert M. Ewers,
Georgina M. Mace,
Jörn P. W. Scharlemann,
Andy Purvis
,
Dominic J. Bennett,
Argyrios Choimes,
Ben Collen,
Julie Day,
Adriana De Palma,
Sandra Díaz,
Susy Echeverria-Londoño,
Melanie J. Edgar,
Anat Feldman,
Morgan Garon,
Michelle L. K. Harrison,
Tamera Alhusseini,
Daniel J. Ingram,
Yuval Itescu,
Jens Kattge,
Victoria Kemp,
Lucinda Kirkpatrick,
Michael Kleyer,
David Laginha Pinto Correia,
Callum D. Martin,
Shai Meiri,
Maria Novosolov,
Yuan Pan,
Helen R. P. Phillips,
Drew W. Purves,
Alexandra Robinson,
Jake Simpson,
Sean L. Tuck,
Evan Weiher,
Hannah J. White,
Robert M. Ewers,
Georgina M. Mace,
Jörn P. W. Scharlemann,
Andy Purvis
Nature, Volume: 520, Issue: 7545, Pages: 45 - 50
Swansea University Author:
Luca Borger
-
PDF | Supplemental material
Download (281.37KB) -
PDF | Accepted Manuscript
Download (378.16KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1038/nature14324
Abstract
Human activities, especially conversion and degradation of habitats, are causing global biodiversity declines. How local ecological assemblages are responding is less clear—a concern given their importance for many ecosystem functions and services. We analysed a terrestrial assemblage database of un...
| Published in: | Nature |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
| Published: |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
2015
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa20627 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| first_indexed |
2015-04-12T02:06:54Z |
|---|---|
| last_indexed |
2020-11-13T03:30:55Z |
| id |
cronfa20627 |
| recordtype |
SURis |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2020-11-12T11:40:27.3532470</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>20627</id><entry>2015-04-12</entry><title>Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8763-5997</ORCID><firstname>Luca</firstname><surname>Borger</surname><name>Luca Borger</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2015-04-12</date><deptcode>SBI</deptcode><abstract>Human activities, especially conversion and degradation of habitats, are causing global biodiversity declines. How local ecological assemblages are responding is less clear—a concern given their importance for many ecosystem functions and services. We analysed a terrestrial assemblage database of unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage to quantify local biodiversity responses to land use and related changes. Here we show that in the worst-affected habitats, these pressures reduce within-sample species richness by an average of 76.5%, total abundance by 39.5% and rarefaction-based richness by 40.3%. We estimate that, globally, these pressures have already slightly reduced average within-sample richness (by 13.6%), total abundance (10.7%) and rarefaction-based richness (8.1%), with changes showing marked spatial variation. Rapid further losses are predicted under a business-as-usual land-use scenario; within-sample richness is projected to fall by a further 3.4% globally by 2100, with losses concentrated in biodiverse but economically poor countries. Strong mitigation can deliver much more positive biodiversity changes (up to a 1.9% average increase) that are less strongly related to countries' socioeconomic status.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Nature</journal><volume>520</volume><journalNumber>7545</journalNumber><paginationStart>45</paginationStart><paginationEnd>50</paginationEnd><publisher>Springer Science and Business Media LLC</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0028-0836</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1476-4687</issnElectronic><keywords>Conservation biology, Biodiversity, Community ecology, Species Distribution Models, Natural Resources Management, Ecology, Human land use, Global change, Environmental change</keywords><publishedDay>2</publishedDay><publishedMonth>4</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2015</publishedYear><publishedDate>2015-04-02</publishedDate><doi>10.1038/nature14324</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Biosciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SBI</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2020-11-12T11:40:27.3532470</lastEdited><Created>2015-04-12T00:18:53.1223630</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Tim</firstname><surname>Newbold</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Lawrence N.</firstname><surname>Hudson</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Samantha L. L.</firstname><surname>Hill</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Sara</firstname><surname>Contu</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Igor</firstname><surname>Lysenko</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Rebecca A.</firstname><surname>Senior</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Luca</firstname><surname>Borger</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8763-5997</orcid><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Dominic J.</firstname><surname>Bennett</surname><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Argyrios</firstname><surname>Choimes</surname><order>9</order></author><author><firstname>Ben</firstname><surname>Collen</surname><order>10</order></author><author><firstname>Julie</firstname><surname>Day</surname><order>11</order></author><author><firstname>Adriana De</firstname><surname>Palma</surname><order>12</order></author><author><firstname>Sandra</firstname><surname>Díaz</surname><order>13</order></author><author><firstname>Susy</firstname><surname>Echeverria-Londoño</surname><order>14</order></author><author><firstname>Melanie J.</firstname><surname>Edgar</surname><order>15</order></author><author><firstname>Anat</firstname><surname>Feldman</surname><order>16</order></author><author><firstname>Morgan</firstname><surname>Garon</surname><order>17</order></author><author><firstname>Michelle L. K.</firstname><surname>Harrison</surname><order>18</order></author><author><firstname>Tamera</firstname><surname>Alhusseini</surname><order>19</order></author><author><firstname>Daniel J.</firstname><surname>Ingram</surname><order>20</order></author><author><firstname>Yuval</firstname><surname>Itescu</surname><order>21</order></author><author><firstname>Jens</firstname><surname>Kattge</surname><order>22</order></author><author><firstname>Victoria</firstname><surname>Kemp</surname><order>23</order></author><author><firstname>Lucinda</firstname><surname>Kirkpatrick</surname><order>24</order></author><author><firstname>Michael</firstname><surname>Kleyer</surname><order>25</order></author><author><firstname>David Laginha Pinto</firstname><surname>Correia</surname><order>26</order></author><author><firstname>Callum D.</firstname><surname>Martin</surname><order>27</order></author><author><firstname>Shai</firstname><surname>Meiri</surname><order>28</order></author><author><firstname>Maria</firstname><surname>Novosolov</surname><order>29</order></author><author><firstname>Yuan</firstname><surname>Pan</surname><order>30</order></author><author><firstname>Helen R. P.</firstname><surname>Phillips</surname><order>31</order></author><author><firstname>Drew W.</firstname><surname>Purves</surname><order>32</order></author><author><firstname>Alexandra</firstname><surname>Robinson</surname><order>33</order></author><author><firstname>Jake</firstname><surname>Simpson</surname><order>34</order></author><author><firstname>Sean L.</firstname><surname>Tuck</surname><order>35</order></author><author><firstname>Evan</firstname><surname>Weiher</surname><order>36</order></author><author><firstname>Hannah J.</firstname><surname>White</surname><order>37</order></author><author><firstname>Robert M.</firstname><surname>Ewers</surname><order>38</order></author><author><firstname>Georgina M.</firstname><surname>Mace</surname><order>39</order></author><author><firstname>Jörn P. W.</firstname><surname>Scharlemann</surname><order>40</order></author><author><firstname>Andy</firstname><surname>Purvis</surname><order>41</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0020627-08072015235149.pdf</filename><originalFilename>NewboldetalSuppInf_final.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2015-07-08T23:51:49.3930000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>280210</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Supplemental material</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2015-10-02T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect></document><document><filename>0020627-08072015235109.pdf</filename><originalFilename>NewboldetalManuscript_final.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2015-07-08T23:51:09.4270000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>345950</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2015-10-02T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
| spelling |
2020-11-12T11:40:27.3532470 v2 20627 2015-04-12 Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity 8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2 0000-0001-8763-5997 Luca Borger Luca Borger true false 2015-04-12 SBI Human activities, especially conversion and degradation of habitats, are causing global biodiversity declines. How local ecological assemblages are responding is less clear—a concern given their importance for many ecosystem functions and services. We analysed a terrestrial assemblage database of unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage to quantify local biodiversity responses to land use and related changes. Here we show that in the worst-affected habitats, these pressures reduce within-sample species richness by an average of 76.5%, total abundance by 39.5% and rarefaction-based richness by 40.3%. We estimate that, globally, these pressures have already slightly reduced average within-sample richness (by 13.6%), total abundance (10.7%) and rarefaction-based richness (8.1%), with changes showing marked spatial variation. Rapid further losses are predicted under a business-as-usual land-use scenario; within-sample richness is projected to fall by a further 3.4% globally by 2100, with losses concentrated in biodiverse but economically poor countries. Strong mitigation can deliver much more positive biodiversity changes (up to a 1.9% average increase) that are less strongly related to countries' socioeconomic status. Journal Article Nature 520 7545 45 50 Springer Science and Business Media LLC 0028-0836 1476-4687 Conservation biology, Biodiversity, Community ecology, Species Distribution Models, Natural Resources Management, Ecology, Human land use, Global change, Environmental change 2 4 2015 2015-04-02 10.1038/nature14324 COLLEGE NANME Biosciences COLLEGE CODE SBI Swansea University 2020-11-12T11:40:27.3532470 2015-04-12T00:18:53.1223630 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences Tim Newbold 1 Lawrence N. Hudson 2 Samantha L. L. Hill 3 Sara Contu 4 Igor Lysenko 5 Rebecca A. Senior 6 Luca Borger 0000-0001-8763-5997 7 Dominic J. Bennett 8 Argyrios Choimes 9 Ben Collen 10 Julie Day 11 Adriana De Palma 12 Sandra Díaz 13 Susy Echeverria-Londoño 14 Melanie J. Edgar 15 Anat Feldman 16 Morgan Garon 17 Michelle L. K. Harrison 18 Tamera Alhusseini 19 Daniel J. Ingram 20 Yuval Itescu 21 Jens Kattge 22 Victoria Kemp 23 Lucinda Kirkpatrick 24 Michael Kleyer 25 David Laginha Pinto Correia 26 Callum D. Martin 27 Shai Meiri 28 Maria Novosolov 29 Yuan Pan 30 Helen R. P. Phillips 31 Drew W. Purves 32 Alexandra Robinson 33 Jake Simpson 34 Sean L. Tuck 35 Evan Weiher 36 Hannah J. White 37 Robert M. Ewers 38 Georgina M. Mace 39 Jörn P. W. Scharlemann 40 Andy Purvis 41 0020627-08072015235149.pdf NewboldetalSuppInf_final.pdf 2015-07-08T23:51:49.3930000 Output 280210 application/pdf Supplemental material true 2015-10-02T00:00:00.0000000 true 0020627-08072015235109.pdf NewboldetalManuscript_final.pdf 2015-07-08T23:51:09.4270000 Output 345950 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2015-10-02T00:00:00.0000000 true |
| title |
Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity |
| spellingShingle |
Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity Luca Borger |
| title_short |
Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity |
| title_full |
Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity |
| title_fullStr |
Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity |
| title_sort |
Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity |
| author_id_str_mv |
8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2 |
| author_id_fullname_str_mv |
8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2_***_Luca Borger |
| author |
Luca Borger |
| author2 |
Tim Newbold Lawrence N. Hudson Samantha L. L. Hill Sara Contu Igor Lysenko Rebecca A. Senior Luca Borger Dominic J. Bennett Argyrios Choimes Ben Collen Julie Day Adriana De Palma Sandra Díaz Susy Echeverria-Londoño Melanie J. Edgar Anat Feldman Morgan Garon Michelle L. K. Harrison Tamera Alhusseini Daniel J. Ingram Yuval Itescu Jens Kattge Victoria Kemp Lucinda Kirkpatrick Michael Kleyer David Laginha Pinto Correia Callum D. Martin Shai Meiri Maria Novosolov Yuan Pan Helen R. P. Phillips Drew W. Purves Alexandra Robinson Jake Simpson Sean L. Tuck Evan Weiher Hannah J. White Robert M. Ewers Georgina M. Mace Jörn P. W. Scharlemann Andy Purvis |
| format |
Journal article |
| container_title |
Nature |
| container_volume |
520 |
| container_issue |
7545 |
| container_start_page |
45 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| institution |
Swansea University |
| issn |
0028-0836 1476-4687 |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1038/nature14324 |
| publisher |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
| college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| hierarchytype |
|
| hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| department_str |
School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences |
| document_store_str |
1 |
| active_str |
0 |
| description |
Human activities, especially conversion and degradation of habitats, are causing global biodiversity declines. How local ecological assemblages are responding is less clear—a concern given their importance for many ecosystem functions and services. We analysed a terrestrial assemblage database of unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage to quantify local biodiversity responses to land use and related changes. Here we show that in the worst-affected habitats, these pressures reduce within-sample species richness by an average of 76.5%, total abundance by 39.5% and rarefaction-based richness by 40.3%. We estimate that, globally, these pressures have already slightly reduced average within-sample richness (by 13.6%), total abundance (10.7%) and rarefaction-based richness (8.1%), with changes showing marked spatial variation. Rapid further losses are predicted under a business-as-usual land-use scenario; within-sample richness is projected to fall by a further 3.4% globally by 2100, with losses concentrated in biodiverse but economically poor countries. Strong mitigation can deliver much more positive biodiversity changes (up to a 1.9% average increase) that are less strongly related to countries' socioeconomic status. |
| published_date |
2015-04-02T03:24:26Z |
| _version_ |
1763750829136805888 |
| score |
11.016994 |