No Cover Image

Journal article 143 views 7 downloads

Use of the GTT@home Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Kit in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Performance Evaluation Study

Gareth Dunseath Orcid Logo, Steve Luzio Orcid Logo, Ivy Cheung, Sharon Parsons Orcid Logo, Nicola John Orcid Logo, Mahmoud Chokor Orcid Logo, Michael Atkinson Orcid Logo, Rajesh Peter Orcid Logo

JMIR Diabetes, Volume: 11, Pages: e69695 - e69695

Swansea University Authors: Gareth Dunseath Orcid Logo, Steve Luzio Orcid Logo, Ivy Cheung, Sharon Parsons Orcid Logo

  • 71418.VoR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © Gareth J Dunseath, Stephen D Luzio, Wai Yee Cheung, Sharon N Parsons, Nicola John, Mahmoud Chokor, Michael Atkinson, Rajesh Peter. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

    Download (1.49MB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.2196/69695

Abstract

Background:The 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) remains the optimal diagnostic test for use in pregnancy but needs to be performed in the clinical setting. The GTT@home OGTT device offers the potential to enable patients to perform the test at home using capillary blood samples.Objective:This...

Full description

Published in: JMIR Diabetes
ISSN: 2371-4379
Published: JMIR Publications Inc. 2026
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa71418
Abstract: Background:The 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) remains the optimal diagnostic test for use in pregnancy but needs to be performed in the clinical setting. The GTT@home OGTT device offers the potential to enable patients to perform the test at home using capillary blood samples.Objective:This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the GTT@home device compared to the routine National Health Service laboratory reference method using blood samples during an OGTT from pregnant women at high risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods:A total of 65 women (aged >18 y), at high risk for GDM (per the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines) were recruited for this performance evaluation. Following an overnight fast, participants went for a 75-g OGTT. Fasting and 2-hour capillary glucose levels were measured using the GTT@home device with corresponding venous samples measured in the laboratory.Results:The complete data for analysis was available for 61/65 devices. The overall bias for the GTT@home device was +0.16 mmol/L. Correlation analysis of the clinical performance of the two methods using a surveillance error grid showed 79.8% of results in the lowest, 16.9% in the “slight, lower” and 2.4% in the “slight, higher” risk categories. Only 0.8% were “moderate, lower” risk, and none were in any higher risk categories. There was agreement in the classification in 54/61 cases. The GTT@home device under-classified 2 cases and over-classified 5 cases.Conclusions:The GTT@home device worked well in a controlled, antenatal clinical setting. Differences in classification observed were generally due to small differences in glucose values close to the diagnostic cut-offs. The GTT@home device shows promise for home testing of glucose tolerance in pregnant women.
Keywords: device; diagnosis; gestational diabetes; OGTT; glucose; oral glucose tolerance test
College: Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
Funders: This clinical study was funded by Digostics Ltd.
Start Page: e69695
End Page: e69695