Journal article 127 views 3 downloads
Assessing the Size of the Functional Field of View in a Gaze-Contingent Search Paradigm
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume: 8, Issue: ETRA, Pages: 1 - 17
Swansea University Author:
Joe MacInnes
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2024 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Download (754.92KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1145/3655597
Abstract
The functional field of view (FFV) is the part of the visual field centred around the current gaze position that the visual system can process in detail. Its size depends partly on physiological limitations, but its adaptability is largely determined by cognitive factors. For example, changes in the...
| Published in: | Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2573-0142 |
| Published: |
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
2024
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa71050 |
| first_indexed |
2025-12-02T13:01:43Z |
|---|---|
| last_indexed |
2026-01-17T05:33:15Z |
| id |
cronfa71050 |
| recordtype |
SURis |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2026-01-16T16:59:50.1883344</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>71050</id><entry>2025-12-02</entry><title>Assessing the Size of the Functional Field of View in a Gaze-Contingent Search Paradigm</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>06dcb003ec50192bafde2c77bef4fd5c</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-5134-1601</ORCID><firstname>Joe</firstname><surname>MacInnes</surname><name>Joe MacInnes</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2025-12-02</date><deptcode>MACS</deptcode><abstract>The functional field of view (FFV) is the part of the visual field centred around the current gaze position that the visual system can process in detail. Its size depends partly on physiological limitations, but its adaptability is largely determined by cognitive factors. For example, changes in the FFV often reflect the demands of a given task: it shrinks with high task demands and expands with easier tasks. Here, we placed an upright or inverted target among distractors. We manipulated the visibility of the search array during gaze-contingent search with small (6°), medium (12°) and large (18°) apertures. Aperture size affected performance, improving it when it increased from 6° to 12°, but not from 12° to 18°, suggesting an upper bound of the 'natural' aperture for this specific task. Furthermore, our results suggest that the FFV does not change in size in response to stimulus inversion.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction</journal><volume>8</volume><journalNumber>ETRA</journalNumber><paginationStart>1</paginationStart><paginationEnd>17</paginationEnd><publisher>Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>2573-0142</issnElectronic><keywords>Functional field of view, Visual search, Visual attention, Gazecontingent setup</keywords><publishedDay>28</publishedDay><publishedMonth>5</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-05-28</publishedDate><doi>10.1145/3655597</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Mathematics and Computer Science School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>MACS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Other</apcterm><funders>Funding for this research was provided by the Icelandic Research Fund and the Research Fund of
the University of Iceland (to AK).</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2026-01-16T16:59:50.1883344</lastEdited><Created>2025-12-02T12:53:24.7070270</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Sofia</firstname><surname>Krasovskaya</surname><orcid>0000-0002-9120-7407</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Árni</firstname><surname>Kristjánsson</surname><orcid>0000-0003-4168-4886</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Joe</firstname><surname>MacInnes</surname><orcid>0000-0002-5134-1601</orcid><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>71050__35727__da7a73ab9faf4697a07c5c65993e0901.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Krasovskaya ETRA.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2025-12-02T12:58:31.0950149</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>773038</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2024 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
| spelling |
2026-01-16T16:59:50.1883344 v2 71050 2025-12-02 Assessing the Size of the Functional Field of View in a Gaze-Contingent Search Paradigm 06dcb003ec50192bafde2c77bef4fd5c 0000-0002-5134-1601 Joe MacInnes Joe MacInnes true false 2025-12-02 MACS The functional field of view (FFV) is the part of the visual field centred around the current gaze position that the visual system can process in detail. Its size depends partly on physiological limitations, but its adaptability is largely determined by cognitive factors. For example, changes in the FFV often reflect the demands of a given task: it shrinks with high task demands and expands with easier tasks. Here, we placed an upright or inverted target among distractors. We manipulated the visibility of the search array during gaze-contingent search with small (6°), medium (12°) and large (18°) apertures. Aperture size affected performance, improving it when it increased from 6° to 12°, but not from 12° to 18°, suggesting an upper bound of the 'natural' aperture for this specific task. Furthermore, our results suggest that the FFV does not change in size in response to stimulus inversion. Journal Article Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8 ETRA 1 17 Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) 2573-0142 Functional field of view, Visual search, Visual attention, Gazecontingent setup 28 5 2024 2024-05-28 10.1145/3655597 COLLEGE NANME Mathematics and Computer Science School COLLEGE CODE MACS Swansea University Other Funding for this research was provided by the Icelandic Research Fund and the Research Fund of the University of Iceland (to AK). 2026-01-16T16:59:50.1883344 2025-12-02T12:53:24.7070270 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science Sofia Krasovskaya 0000-0002-9120-7407 1 Árni Kristjánsson 0000-0003-4168-4886 2 Joe MacInnes 0000-0002-5134-1601 3 71050__35727__da7a73ab9faf4697a07c5c65993e0901.pdf Krasovskaya ETRA.pdf 2025-12-02T12:58:31.0950149 Output 773038 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2024 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License. true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| title |
Assessing the Size of the Functional Field of View in a Gaze-Contingent Search Paradigm |
| spellingShingle |
Assessing the Size of the Functional Field of View in a Gaze-Contingent Search Paradigm Joe MacInnes |
| title_short |
Assessing the Size of the Functional Field of View in a Gaze-Contingent Search Paradigm |
| title_full |
Assessing the Size of the Functional Field of View in a Gaze-Contingent Search Paradigm |
| title_fullStr |
Assessing the Size of the Functional Field of View in a Gaze-Contingent Search Paradigm |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Assessing the Size of the Functional Field of View in a Gaze-Contingent Search Paradigm |
| title_sort |
Assessing the Size of the Functional Field of View in a Gaze-Contingent Search Paradigm |
| author_id_str_mv |
06dcb003ec50192bafde2c77bef4fd5c |
| author_id_fullname_str_mv |
06dcb003ec50192bafde2c77bef4fd5c_***_Joe MacInnes |
| author |
Joe MacInnes |
| author2 |
Sofia Krasovskaya Árni Kristjánsson Joe MacInnes |
| format |
Journal article |
| container_title |
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction |
| container_volume |
8 |
| container_issue |
ETRA |
| container_start_page |
1 |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| institution |
Swansea University |
| issn |
2573-0142 |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1145/3655597 |
| publisher |
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) |
| college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| hierarchytype |
|
| hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| department_str |
School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science |
| document_store_str |
1 |
| active_str |
0 |
| description |
The functional field of view (FFV) is the part of the visual field centred around the current gaze position that the visual system can process in detail. Its size depends partly on physiological limitations, but its adaptability is largely determined by cognitive factors. For example, changes in the FFV often reflect the demands of a given task: it shrinks with high task demands and expands with easier tasks. Here, we placed an upright or inverted target among distractors. We manipulated the visibility of the search array during gaze-contingent search with small (6°), medium (12°) and large (18°) apertures. Aperture size affected performance, improving it when it increased from 6° to 12°, but not from 12° to 18°, suggesting an upper bound of the 'natural' aperture for this specific task. Furthermore, our results suggest that the FFV does not change in size in response to stimulus inversion. |
| published_date |
2024-05-28T05:34:26Z |
| _version_ |
1856896464718921728 |
| score |
11.096068 |

