No Cover Image

Journal article 272 views 43 downloads

Not always as advertised: Different effects from viewing safer gambling (harm prevention) adverts on gambling urges

Philip Newall Orcid Logo, Leonardo Weiss-Cohen, Jamie Torrance Orcid Logo, Yakov Bart Orcid Logo

Addictive Behaviors, Volume: 160, Start page: 108161

Swansea University Author: Jamie Torrance Orcid Logo

  • 71039.VOR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license.

    Download (1.13MB)

Abstract

Public concern around gambling advertising in the UK has been met not by government action but by industry self-regulations, such as a forthcoming voluntary ban on front-of-shirt gambling sponsorship in Premier League soccer. “Safer gambling” (harm prevention) adverts are one recent example, and are...

Full description

Published in: Addictive Behaviors
ISSN: 0306-4603 1873-6327
Published: Elsevier BV 2025
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa71039
first_indexed 2025-12-01T13:58:24Z
last_indexed 2025-12-02T07:55:03Z
id cronfa71039
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2025-12-01T15:35:11.5486649</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>71039</id><entry>2025-12-01</entry><title>Not always as advertised: Different effects from viewing safer gambling (harm prevention) adverts on gambling urges</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>de868c4f56d8f5fbecbd686fdbb7b4b5</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-5001-4126</ORCID><firstname>Jamie</firstname><surname>Torrance</surname><name>Jamie Torrance</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2025-12-01</date><deptcode>PSYS</deptcode><abstract>Public concern around gambling advertising in the UK has been met not by government action but by industry self-regulations, such as a forthcoming voluntary ban on front-of-shirt gambling sponsorship in Premier League soccer. &#x201C;Safer gambling&#x201D; (harm prevention) adverts are one recent example, and are TV commercials which inform viewers about gambling-related harm. The present work is the first independent evaluation of safer gambling adverts by both gambling operators and a charity called GambleAware. In an online experiment, we observed the change in participants&#x2019; (N = 2,741) Gambling Urge Scale (GUS) scores after viewing either: a conventional financial inducement gambling advert, a gambling operator&#x2019;s safer gambling advert, an advert from the GambleAware &#x201C;bet regret&#x201D; campaign, an advert from the GambleAware &#x201C;stigma reduction&#x201D; campaign, or a control advert that was not about gambling. Relative to a neutral control advert, GUS scores increased after viewing a financial inducement or an operator&#x2019;s safer gambling advert. In comparison to the neutral control condition, GUS score changes were similar after viewing a bet regret advert, but showed a significant decrease after viewing a stigma reduction advert. Those at higher risk of harm reported larger decreases in GUS after watching a bet regret or stigma reduction advert. Overall, this study introduced a novel experimental paradigm for evaluating safer gambling adverts, uncovered a potential downside from gambling operators&#x2019; safer gambling adverts, and revealed variation in the potential effectiveness of charity-delivered safer gambling adverts.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Addictive Behaviors</journal><volume>160</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>108161</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0306-4603</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1873-6327</issnElectronic><keywords>Gambling marketing; Safer gambling; Commercials; Gambling harm reduction</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2025</publishedYear><publishedDate>2025-01-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108161</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>PSYS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders>Funded by a NCH-NU Research and Learning Development Initiative Grant.</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-12-01T15:35:11.5486649</lastEdited><Created>2025-12-01T13:53:12.6441284</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Philip</firstname><surname>Newall</surname><orcid>0000-0002-1660-9254</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Leonardo</firstname><surname>Weiss-Cohen</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Jamie</firstname><surname>Torrance</surname><orcid>0000-0001-5001-4126</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Yakov</firstname><surname>Bart</surname><orcid>0000-0002-4094-9873</orcid><order>4</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>71039__35724__98cb913333204ba0b04f2e02a50b0f35.pdf</filename><originalFilename>71039.VOR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2025-12-01T15:32:56.7855430</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1179954</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>&#xA9; 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2025-12-01T15:35:11.5486649 v2 71039 2025-12-01 Not always as advertised: Different effects from viewing safer gambling (harm prevention) adverts on gambling urges de868c4f56d8f5fbecbd686fdbb7b4b5 0000-0001-5001-4126 Jamie Torrance Jamie Torrance true false 2025-12-01 PSYS Public concern around gambling advertising in the UK has been met not by government action but by industry self-regulations, such as a forthcoming voluntary ban on front-of-shirt gambling sponsorship in Premier League soccer. “Safer gambling” (harm prevention) adverts are one recent example, and are TV commercials which inform viewers about gambling-related harm. The present work is the first independent evaluation of safer gambling adverts by both gambling operators and a charity called GambleAware. In an online experiment, we observed the change in participants’ (N = 2,741) Gambling Urge Scale (GUS) scores after viewing either: a conventional financial inducement gambling advert, a gambling operator’s safer gambling advert, an advert from the GambleAware “bet regret” campaign, an advert from the GambleAware “stigma reduction” campaign, or a control advert that was not about gambling. Relative to a neutral control advert, GUS scores increased after viewing a financial inducement or an operator’s safer gambling advert. In comparison to the neutral control condition, GUS score changes were similar after viewing a bet regret advert, but showed a significant decrease after viewing a stigma reduction advert. Those at higher risk of harm reported larger decreases in GUS after watching a bet regret or stigma reduction advert. Overall, this study introduced a novel experimental paradigm for evaluating safer gambling adverts, uncovered a potential downside from gambling operators’ safer gambling adverts, and revealed variation in the potential effectiveness of charity-delivered safer gambling adverts. Journal Article Addictive Behaviors 160 108161 Elsevier BV 0306-4603 1873-6327 Gambling marketing; Safer gambling; Commercials; Gambling harm reduction 1 1 2025 2025-01-01 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108161 COLLEGE NANME Psychology School COLLEGE CODE PSYS Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee Funded by a NCH-NU Research and Learning Development Initiative Grant. 2025-12-01T15:35:11.5486649 2025-12-01T13:53:12.6441284 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Philip Newall 0000-0002-1660-9254 1 Leonardo Weiss-Cohen 2 Jamie Torrance 0000-0001-5001-4126 3 Yakov Bart 0000-0002-4094-9873 4 71039__35724__98cb913333204ba0b04f2e02a50b0f35.pdf 71039.VOR.pdf 2025-12-01T15:32:56.7855430 Output 1179954 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license. true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Not always as advertised: Different effects from viewing safer gambling (harm prevention) adverts on gambling urges
spellingShingle Not always as advertised: Different effects from viewing safer gambling (harm prevention) adverts on gambling urges
Jamie Torrance
title_short Not always as advertised: Different effects from viewing safer gambling (harm prevention) adverts on gambling urges
title_full Not always as advertised: Different effects from viewing safer gambling (harm prevention) adverts on gambling urges
title_fullStr Not always as advertised: Different effects from viewing safer gambling (harm prevention) adverts on gambling urges
title_full_unstemmed Not always as advertised: Different effects from viewing safer gambling (harm prevention) adverts on gambling urges
title_sort Not always as advertised: Different effects from viewing safer gambling (harm prevention) adverts on gambling urges
author_id_str_mv de868c4f56d8f5fbecbd686fdbb7b4b5
author_id_fullname_str_mv de868c4f56d8f5fbecbd686fdbb7b4b5_***_Jamie Torrance
author Jamie Torrance
author2 Philip Newall
Leonardo Weiss-Cohen
Jamie Torrance
Yakov Bart
format Journal article
container_title Addictive Behaviors
container_volume 160
container_start_page 108161
publishDate 2025
institution Swansea University
issn 0306-4603
1873-6327
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108161
publisher Elsevier BV
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Public concern around gambling advertising in the UK has been met not by government action but by industry self-regulations, such as a forthcoming voluntary ban on front-of-shirt gambling sponsorship in Premier League soccer. “Safer gambling” (harm prevention) adverts are one recent example, and are TV commercials which inform viewers about gambling-related harm. The present work is the first independent evaluation of safer gambling adverts by both gambling operators and a charity called GambleAware. In an online experiment, we observed the change in participants’ (N = 2,741) Gambling Urge Scale (GUS) scores after viewing either: a conventional financial inducement gambling advert, a gambling operator’s safer gambling advert, an advert from the GambleAware “bet regret” campaign, an advert from the GambleAware “stigma reduction” campaign, or a control advert that was not about gambling. Relative to a neutral control advert, GUS scores increased after viewing a financial inducement or an operator’s safer gambling advert. In comparison to the neutral control condition, GUS score changes were similar after viewing a bet regret advert, but showed a significant decrease after viewing a stigma reduction advert. Those at higher risk of harm reported larger decreases in GUS after watching a bet regret or stigma reduction advert. Overall, this study introduced a novel experimental paradigm for evaluating safer gambling adverts, uncovered a potential downside from gambling operators’ safer gambling adverts, and revealed variation in the potential effectiveness of charity-delivered safer gambling adverts.
published_date 2025-01-01T05:34:24Z
_version_ 1856896462629109760
score 11.096068