No Cover Image

Journal article 320 views 37 downloads

A typology of Roma misrepresentation in contemporary Europe: Marginalization, denizenship, suppression and co-option

Pier-Luc Dupont Picard Orcid Logo

Deusto Journal of Human Rights, Issue: 15, Pages: 161 - 183

Swansea University Author: Pier-Luc Dupont Picard Orcid Logo

  • 2025 Dupont Roma misrepresentation.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    Copyright (c) 2025 University of Deusto. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

    Download (177.88KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.18543/djhr.3316

Abstract

Building on David Theo Goldberg’s account of the racial state and empirical research on Roma people in Europe, this article delineates various ways in which racism can undermine political representation. To that end it deploys Nancy Fraser’s concepts of “ordinary-political misrepresentation” and “mi...

Full description

Published in: Deusto Journal of Human Rights
ISSN: 2530-4275 2603-6002
Published: University of Deusto 2025
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa69915
first_indexed 2025-07-07T22:02:08Z
last_indexed 2025-09-05T06:12:07Z
id cronfa69915
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2025-09-04T12:50:04.0289327</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>69915</id><entry>2025-07-07</entry><title>A typology of Roma misrepresentation in contemporary Europe: Marginalization, denizenship, suppression and co-option</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>a8843d62ec83157f25d4bc7935e1479e</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-1610-4667</ORCID><firstname>Pier-Luc</firstname><surname>Dupont Picard</surname><name>Pier-Luc Dupont Picard</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2025-07-07</date><deptcode>SOSS</deptcode><abstract>Building on David Theo Goldberg&#x2019;s account of the racial state and empirical research on Roma people in Europe, this article delineates various ways in which racism can undermine political representation. To that end it deploys Nancy Fraser&#x2019;s concepts of &#x201C;ordinary-political misrepresentation&#x201D; and &#x201C;misframing&#x201D;; the all-affected/subjected principle used to identify those entitled to influence political decisions; and Hannah Pitkin&#x2019;s four-dimensional conception of representation as substantive, formal, descriptive and symbolic. The article distinguishes racialized forms of misrepresentation rooted in everyday discrimination and educational exclusion (marginalization), the denial of citizenship (denizenship), the negation of subjectively held cultural identities (suppression) and the capture of minority leaders (co-option). It suggests that the first constitutes an &#x201C;ordinary-political&#x201D; form of inequality among citizens, whereas the latter three violate the all-affected/subjected principle through the misframing of the legitimate policymaking constituency.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Deusto Journal of Human Rights</journal><volume/><journalNumber>15</journalNumber><paginationStart>161</paginationStart><paginationEnd>183</paginationEnd><publisher>University of Deusto</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>2530-4275</issnPrint><issnElectronic>2603-6002</issnElectronic><keywords>representation, democracy, citizenship, racism, diversity, equality</keywords><publishedDay>30</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2025</publishedYear><publishedDate>2025-06-30</publishedDate><doi>10.18543/djhr.3316</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Social Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SOSS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>Horizon 2020 project ETHOS: Towards a European Theory of Justice and Fairness (grant number 727112).</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-09-04T12:50:04.0289327</lastEdited><Created>2025-07-07T21:32:05.8094027</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Pier-Luc</firstname><surname>Dupont Picard</surname><orcid>0000-0003-1610-4667</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>69915__34751__c020fcd23ef94a3392abdd62a6ec215f.pdf</filename><originalFilename>2025 Dupont Roma misrepresentation.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2025-07-12T08:20:32.8831700</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>182144</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>Copyright (c) 2025 University of Deusto. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2025-09-04T12:50:04.0289327 v2 69915 2025-07-07 A typology of Roma misrepresentation in contemporary Europe: Marginalization, denizenship, suppression and co-option a8843d62ec83157f25d4bc7935e1479e 0000-0003-1610-4667 Pier-Luc Dupont Picard Pier-Luc Dupont Picard true false 2025-07-07 SOSS Building on David Theo Goldberg’s account of the racial state and empirical research on Roma people in Europe, this article delineates various ways in which racism can undermine political representation. To that end it deploys Nancy Fraser’s concepts of “ordinary-political misrepresentation” and “misframing”; the all-affected/subjected principle used to identify those entitled to influence political decisions; and Hannah Pitkin’s four-dimensional conception of representation as substantive, formal, descriptive and symbolic. The article distinguishes racialized forms of misrepresentation rooted in everyday discrimination and educational exclusion (marginalization), the denial of citizenship (denizenship), the negation of subjectively held cultural identities (suppression) and the capture of minority leaders (co-option). It suggests that the first constitutes an “ordinary-political” form of inequality among citizens, whereas the latter three violate the all-affected/subjected principle through the misframing of the legitimate policymaking constituency. Journal Article Deusto Journal of Human Rights 15 161 183 University of Deusto 2530-4275 2603-6002 representation, democracy, citizenship, racism, diversity, equality 30 6 2025 2025-06-30 10.18543/djhr.3316 COLLEGE NANME Social Sciences School COLLEGE CODE SOSS Swansea University Horizon 2020 project ETHOS: Towards a European Theory of Justice and Fairness (grant number 727112). 2025-09-04T12:50:04.0289327 2025-07-07T21:32:05.8094027 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations Pier-Luc Dupont Picard 0000-0003-1610-4667 1 69915__34751__c020fcd23ef94a3392abdd62a6ec215f.pdf 2025 Dupont Roma misrepresentation.pdf 2025-07-12T08:20:32.8831700 Output 182144 application/pdf Version of Record true Copyright (c) 2025 University of Deusto. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
title A typology of Roma misrepresentation in contemporary Europe: Marginalization, denizenship, suppression and co-option
spellingShingle A typology of Roma misrepresentation in contemporary Europe: Marginalization, denizenship, suppression and co-option
Pier-Luc Dupont Picard
title_short A typology of Roma misrepresentation in contemporary Europe: Marginalization, denizenship, suppression and co-option
title_full A typology of Roma misrepresentation in contemporary Europe: Marginalization, denizenship, suppression and co-option
title_fullStr A typology of Roma misrepresentation in contemporary Europe: Marginalization, denizenship, suppression and co-option
title_full_unstemmed A typology of Roma misrepresentation in contemporary Europe: Marginalization, denizenship, suppression and co-option
title_sort A typology of Roma misrepresentation in contemporary Europe: Marginalization, denizenship, suppression and co-option
author_id_str_mv a8843d62ec83157f25d4bc7935e1479e
author_id_fullname_str_mv a8843d62ec83157f25d4bc7935e1479e_***_Pier-Luc Dupont Picard
author Pier-Luc Dupont Picard
author2 Pier-Luc Dupont Picard
format Journal article
container_title Deusto Journal of Human Rights
container_issue 15
container_start_page 161
publishDate 2025
institution Swansea University
issn 2530-4275
2603-6002
doi_str_mv 10.18543/djhr.3316
publisher University of Deusto
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Building on David Theo Goldberg’s account of the racial state and empirical research on Roma people in Europe, this article delineates various ways in which racism can undermine political representation. To that end it deploys Nancy Fraser’s concepts of “ordinary-political misrepresentation” and “misframing”; the all-affected/subjected principle used to identify those entitled to influence political decisions; and Hannah Pitkin’s four-dimensional conception of representation as substantive, formal, descriptive and symbolic. The article distinguishes racialized forms of misrepresentation rooted in everyday discrimination and educational exclusion (marginalization), the denial of citizenship (denizenship), the negation of subjectively held cultural identities (suppression) and the capture of minority leaders (co-option). It suggests that the first constitutes an “ordinary-political” form of inequality among citizens, whereas the latter three violate the all-affected/subjected principle through the misframing of the legitimate policymaking constituency.
published_date 2025-06-30T05:29:27Z
_version_ 1851097945060933632
score 11.089386