Journal article 336 views 78 downloads
Why catch when you can throw? A framework for tagging animals without capture or restraint
,
James Redcliffe,
Mark Holton ,
Philip Hopkins,
VICTORIA THOMAS,
Frank Narve Rosell,
Hanna Kavli Lodberg-Holm,
Christian Robstad,
Theodoros Kominos,
Antonia Galanaki,
Giannis Gasteratos,
Theodoros Naziridis,
Richard Gunner,
Vaclav Silovsky,
Miloš Ježek,
Holly English ,
OLIVIA SHOTT,
KATHRYN BAMBRIDGE,
AMY FULLER,
Caitlin Willoughby,
ELLIOT DEE,
Hazel Nichols ,
Flavio Quintana ,
Andreas Fahlman ,
Josefin Larsson,
David M. Scantlebury ,
Ursula Siebert
Royal Society Open Science, Volume: 12, Issue: 7
Swansea University Authors:
Rory Wilson , James Redcliffe, Mark Holton , Philip Hopkins, VICTORIA THOMAS, OLIVIA SHOTT, KATHRYN BAMBRIDGE, AMY FULLER, ELLIOT DEE, Hazel Nichols
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2025 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Download (3.51MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1098/rsos.250139
Abstract
The use of electronic tags has significantly advanced our understanding of wild animal behaviour and physiology. However, traditional tagging methods often require capturing and restraining or sedating animals, which causes stress and may potentially affect data quality during acclimatization. Inspi...
| Published in: | Royal Society Open Science |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2054-5703 |
| Published: |
The Royal Society
2025
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa69721 |
| Abstract: |
The use of electronic tags has significantly advanced our understanding of wild animal behaviour and physiology. However, traditional tagging methods often require capturing and restraining or sedating animals, which causes stress and may potentially affect data quality during acclimatization. Inspired by plant burs, we propose a novel ‘bur-tagging’ system to attach tags without capture or restraint. We outline a framework for bur-tagging, detailing the design and key considerations for its success. This includes the influence of tagging site location and animal neophobia on the likelihood of tagging over time, strategies to target specific species, and methods to improve tag placement accuracy. The choice of adhesive mechanism and application force are discussed as critical factors for effective attachment. Preliminary trials highlight animal reactions to inactive tagging systems, demonstrating ways to minimize stress and increase tagging efficiency. Field tests on domestic animals and wild canids in Greece suggest that bur-tagging is a viable alternative to conventional methods. While still in development, bur-tagging has the potential to deploy advanced electronic tags on wild animals with reduced stress and greater ethical consideration, offering a promising tool for wildlife research. This innovative approach bridges biology and technology to address challenges in animal tagging. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
bur-tagging, biologging, biotelemetry, animalcapture, animal restrain |
| College: |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| Funders: |
Humboldt Foundation; The University of South Eastern Norway; VW Foundation |
| Issue: |
7 |