Journal article 324 views 113 downloads
The Role of Medication Beliefs in COVID-19 Vaccine and Booster Uptake in Healthcare Workers: An Exploratory Study
Healthcare, Volume: 11, Issue: 13, Start page: 1967
Swansea University Author:
Delyth James
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2023 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Download (584.87KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.3390/healthcare11131967
Abstract
Illness and medication beliefs have shown to predict COVID-19 vaccination behaviour in the general population, but this relationship has yet to be demonstrated in healthcare staff. This research aimed to explore the potential explanatory value of illness and medication beliefs on the COVID-19 vaccin...
| Published in: | Healthcare |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2227-9032 |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa69690 |
| first_indexed |
2025-06-11T16:01:52Z |
|---|---|
| last_indexed |
2025-07-11T05:02:14Z |
| id |
cronfa69690 |
| recordtype |
SURis |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2025-07-10T12:32:22.4207263</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>69690</id><entry>2025-06-11</entry><title>The Role of Medication Beliefs in COVID-19 Vaccine and Booster Uptake in Healthcare Workers: An Exploratory Study</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>dc24cdd4d09d96fa49a0f213d1060cf9</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-7434-7064</ORCID><firstname>Delyth</firstname><surname>James</surname><name>Delyth James</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2025-06-11</date><deptcode>MEDS</deptcode><abstract>Illness and medication beliefs have shown to predict COVID-19 vaccination behaviour in the general population, but this relationship has yet to be demonstrated in healthcare staff. This research aimed to explore the potential explanatory value of illness and medication beliefs on the COVID-19 vaccination uptake of a sample of patient-facing healthcare workers (HCWs). A web-based questionnaire—measuring beliefs about vaccinations (the BMQ), perceptions of COVID-19 (the BIPQ), vaccine hesitancy, and vaccine uptake—was targeted to HCWs via social media platforms between May–July 2022. Open text responses allowed participants to provide explanations for any delay in vaccine uptake. A total of 91 participants completed the questionnaire. Most respondents (77.1%, n = 64) had received three doses of the COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccination uptake (number of doses received) was predicted by Vaccine Concerns, Vaccine Hesitancy, and their Necessity–Concerns Differential score. Vaccine Hesitancy was predicted by Necessity, Concerns, and Overuse scores, as well as Necessity–Concerns Differential scores. Delay in Vaccine Uptake could only be predicted for Dose 3 (Booster). Qualitative data revealed that hesitant respondents were “unable to take time off work” for vaccination and that some had concerns over vaccine safety. In conclusion, illness and medication beliefs have potential value in predicting vaccine hesitancy and uptake in healthcare workers. Interventions to improve vaccination uptake in this population should address concerns about vaccine safety and releasing staff for vaccination booster appointments should be prioritised. Future research should further investigate the relationship between illness and medication beliefs and COVID-19 vaccine uptake in a larger sample of healthcare workers.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Healthcare</journal><volume>11</volume><journalNumber>13</journalNumber><paginationStart>1967</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>2227-9032</issnElectronic><keywords>COVID-19; vaccination; booster; healthcare workers; vaccine hesitancy; self-regulatory model; necessity–concerns framework; illness perceptions; vaccine delay; vaccine uptake</keywords><publishedDay>7</publishedDay><publishedMonth>7</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-07-07</publishedDate><doi>10.3390/healthcare11131967</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Medical School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>MEDS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders>This research received no external funding.</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-07-10T12:32:22.4207263</lastEdited><Created>2025-06-11T14:37:48.8602083</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">Swansea University Medical School - Pharmacy</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Carys</firstname><surname>Dale</surname><orcid>0009-0008-4899-3909</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Catherine Heidi</firstname><surname>Seage</surname><orcid>0000-0002-8590-867x</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Rhiannon</firstname><surname>Phillips</surname><orcid>0000-0002-4256-4598</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Delyth</firstname><surname>James</surname><orcid>0000-0001-7434-7064</orcid><order>4</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>69690__34727__b75cae82399c4e1191941ddc0897f172.pdf</filename><originalFilename>69690.VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2025-07-10T12:29:45.3455407</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>598908</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2023 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
| spelling |
2025-07-10T12:32:22.4207263 v2 69690 2025-06-11 The Role of Medication Beliefs in COVID-19 Vaccine and Booster Uptake in Healthcare Workers: An Exploratory Study dc24cdd4d09d96fa49a0f213d1060cf9 0000-0001-7434-7064 Delyth James Delyth James true false 2025-06-11 MEDS Illness and medication beliefs have shown to predict COVID-19 vaccination behaviour in the general population, but this relationship has yet to be demonstrated in healthcare staff. This research aimed to explore the potential explanatory value of illness and medication beliefs on the COVID-19 vaccination uptake of a sample of patient-facing healthcare workers (HCWs). A web-based questionnaire—measuring beliefs about vaccinations (the BMQ), perceptions of COVID-19 (the BIPQ), vaccine hesitancy, and vaccine uptake—was targeted to HCWs via social media platforms between May–July 2022. Open text responses allowed participants to provide explanations for any delay in vaccine uptake. A total of 91 participants completed the questionnaire. Most respondents (77.1%, n = 64) had received three doses of the COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccination uptake (number of doses received) was predicted by Vaccine Concerns, Vaccine Hesitancy, and their Necessity–Concerns Differential score. Vaccine Hesitancy was predicted by Necessity, Concerns, and Overuse scores, as well as Necessity–Concerns Differential scores. Delay in Vaccine Uptake could only be predicted for Dose 3 (Booster). Qualitative data revealed that hesitant respondents were “unable to take time off work” for vaccination and that some had concerns over vaccine safety. In conclusion, illness and medication beliefs have potential value in predicting vaccine hesitancy and uptake in healthcare workers. Interventions to improve vaccination uptake in this population should address concerns about vaccine safety and releasing staff for vaccination booster appointments should be prioritised. Future research should further investigate the relationship between illness and medication beliefs and COVID-19 vaccine uptake in a larger sample of healthcare workers. Journal Article Healthcare 11 13 1967 MDPI AG 2227-9032 COVID-19; vaccination; booster; healthcare workers; vaccine hesitancy; self-regulatory model; necessity–concerns framework; illness perceptions; vaccine delay; vaccine uptake 7 7 2023 2023-07-07 10.3390/healthcare11131967 COLLEGE NANME Medical School COLLEGE CODE MEDS Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee This research received no external funding. 2025-07-10T12:32:22.4207263 2025-06-11T14:37:48.8602083 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Swansea University Medical School - Pharmacy Carys Dale 0009-0008-4899-3909 1 Catherine Heidi Seage 0000-0002-8590-867x 2 Rhiannon Phillips 0000-0002-4256-4598 3 Delyth James 0000-0001-7434-7064 4 69690__34727__b75cae82399c4e1191941ddc0897f172.pdf 69690.VoR.pdf 2025-07-10T12:29:45.3455407 Output 598908 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2023 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. true eng https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/ |
| title |
The Role of Medication Beliefs in COVID-19 Vaccine and Booster Uptake in Healthcare Workers: An Exploratory Study |
| spellingShingle |
The Role of Medication Beliefs in COVID-19 Vaccine and Booster Uptake in Healthcare Workers: An Exploratory Study Delyth James |
| title_short |
The Role of Medication Beliefs in COVID-19 Vaccine and Booster Uptake in Healthcare Workers: An Exploratory Study |
| title_full |
The Role of Medication Beliefs in COVID-19 Vaccine and Booster Uptake in Healthcare Workers: An Exploratory Study |
| title_fullStr |
The Role of Medication Beliefs in COVID-19 Vaccine and Booster Uptake in Healthcare Workers: An Exploratory Study |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Role of Medication Beliefs in COVID-19 Vaccine and Booster Uptake in Healthcare Workers: An Exploratory Study |
| title_sort |
The Role of Medication Beliefs in COVID-19 Vaccine and Booster Uptake in Healthcare Workers: An Exploratory Study |
| author_id_str_mv |
dc24cdd4d09d96fa49a0f213d1060cf9 |
| author_id_fullname_str_mv |
dc24cdd4d09d96fa49a0f213d1060cf9_***_Delyth James |
| author |
Delyth James |
| author2 |
Carys Dale Catherine Heidi Seage Rhiannon Phillips Delyth James |
| format |
Journal article |
| container_title |
Healthcare |
| container_volume |
11 |
| container_issue |
13 |
| container_start_page |
1967 |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| institution |
Swansea University |
| issn |
2227-9032 |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3390/healthcare11131967 |
| publisher |
MDPI AG |
| college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| hierarchytype |
|
| hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| department_str |
Swansea University Medical School - Pharmacy{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Swansea University Medical School - Pharmacy |
| document_store_str |
1 |
| active_str |
0 |
| description |
Illness and medication beliefs have shown to predict COVID-19 vaccination behaviour in the general population, but this relationship has yet to be demonstrated in healthcare staff. This research aimed to explore the potential explanatory value of illness and medication beliefs on the COVID-19 vaccination uptake of a sample of patient-facing healthcare workers (HCWs). A web-based questionnaire—measuring beliefs about vaccinations (the BMQ), perceptions of COVID-19 (the BIPQ), vaccine hesitancy, and vaccine uptake—was targeted to HCWs via social media platforms between May–July 2022. Open text responses allowed participants to provide explanations for any delay in vaccine uptake. A total of 91 participants completed the questionnaire. Most respondents (77.1%, n = 64) had received three doses of the COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccination uptake (number of doses received) was predicted by Vaccine Concerns, Vaccine Hesitancy, and their Necessity–Concerns Differential score. Vaccine Hesitancy was predicted by Necessity, Concerns, and Overuse scores, as well as Necessity–Concerns Differential scores. Delay in Vaccine Uptake could only be predicted for Dose 3 (Booster). Qualitative data revealed that hesitant respondents were “unable to take time off work” for vaccination and that some had concerns over vaccine safety. In conclusion, illness and medication beliefs have potential value in predicting vaccine hesitancy and uptake in healthcare workers. Interventions to improve vaccination uptake in this population should address concerns about vaccine safety and releasing staff for vaccination booster appointments should be prioritised. Future research should further investigate the relationship between illness and medication beliefs and COVID-19 vaccine uptake in a larger sample of healthcare workers. |
| published_date |
2023-07-07T05:27:38Z |
| _version_ |
1851369622341681152 |
| score |
11.089572 |

