Journal article 326 views 74 downloads
The relationship between circadian type and physical activity as predictors of cognitive performance during simulated nightshifts: A randomised controlled trial
Chronobiology International, Volume: 42, Issue: 6, Pages: 736 - 754
Swansea University Author:
Philip Tucker
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2025 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Download (1.65MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1080/07420528.2025.2503866
Abstract
Nightshift is associated with impaired cognitive performance on many tasks, yet performance is also moderated by individual differences. We investigated the effect of circadian type (two factors: flexible-rigid, and languid-vigour), and the efficacy of a novel countermeasure, breaking up sitting wit...
| Published in: | Chronobiology International |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0742-0528 1525-6073 |
| Published: |
Informa UK Limited
2025
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa69533 |
| first_indexed |
2025-05-20T08:40:24Z |
|---|---|
| last_indexed |
2025-08-01T10:24:11Z |
| id |
cronfa69533 |
| recordtype |
SURis |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2025-07-30T14:58:12.6465562</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>69533</id><entry>2025-05-20</entry><title>The relationship between circadian type and physical activity as predictors of cognitive performance during simulated nightshifts: A randomised controlled trial</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7d07250cf5f1cbaf8788af9f48cf000a</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-8105-0901</ORCID><firstname>Philip</firstname><surname>Tucker</surname><name>Philip Tucker</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2025-05-20</date><deptcode>PSYS</deptcode><abstract>Nightshift is associated with impaired cognitive performance on many tasks, yet performance is also moderated by individual differences. We investigated the effect of circadian type (two factors: flexible-rigid, and languid-vigour), and the efficacy of a novel countermeasure, breaking up sitting with light-intensity physical activity, in the context of nightshift performance. Thirty-three healthy adults (age M ± SD: 24.3 ± 4.6 y; 19 females) participated in a sleep laboratory study over five consecutive simulated nightshifts (2200–0600 h). Sleep opportunities occurred at 0800–1700 h. Participants were randomised to a sedentary (SIT; n = 14), or “breaking-up” sitting (BREAK; n = 19) condition. BREAK participants completed 3 min of light-intensity walking every 30 min at 3.2 km/h, while SIT participants remained seated. Every 2 h during nightshift, participants completed the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (mean RRT), Stroop Task, and Digit Symbol Substitution Task. Participants completed the revised Circadian Type Inventory which categorises individuals on a rigid-flexible scale and a languid-vigorous scale (rigid; n = 12, flexible; n = 11; languid; n = 11, vigorous n = 13). Linear mixed models showed a significant 3-way interaction between Nightshifts (1–5), Condition (SIT, BREAK), and flexibility-rigidity for mean RRT (p = 0.03) only. Flexible types in the BREAK condition had better performance than rigid BREAK, rigid SIT, and flexible SIT over five nights, with performance marginally worse on the first night for all participants apart from rigid SIT. Linear mixed models showed a significant 2-way interaction between Nightshifts (1–5), and flexibility-rigidity for percentage accuracy on the Stroop task, and a significant 2-way interaction between Nightshifts (1–5), and languid-vigour for response time on the Stroop task. Accuracy worsened for rigid types, while response time on the Stroop task improved for languid types over five nights. No other significant differences were found. Breaking up sitting with light-intensity physical activity maintained sustained attention for flexible circadian types across all five experimental nightshifts. Both rigidity and languidity moderated trends in performance, though whether these differences have meaningful real-world implications must be explored further. Our results indicate that circadian type classifications should be accounted for in breaking up sitting interventions overnight.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Chronobiology International</journal><volume>42</volume><journalNumber>6</journalNumber><paginationStart>736</paginationStart><paginationEnd>754</paginationEnd><publisher>Informa UK Limited</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0742-0528</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1525-6073</issnElectronic><keywords>Shift work; night shift; cognitive performance; fatigue countermeasure; physical activity; individual difference; circadian type</keywords><publishedDay>19</publishedDay><publishedMonth>5</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2025</publishedYear><publishedDate>2025-05-19</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/07420528.2025.2503866</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>PSYS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders>This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (IA0802).</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-07-30T14:58:12.6465562</lastEdited><Created>2025-05-20T09:31:32.0420338</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Dayna</firstname><surname>Easton</surname><orcid>0000-0003-4024-4336</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Charlotte</firstname><surname>Gupta</surname><orcid>0000-0003-2436-3327</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Grace</firstname><surname>Vincent</surname><orcid>0000-0002-7036-7823</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Corneel</firstname><surname>Vandelanotte</surname><orcid>0000-0002-4445-8094</orcid><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Mitch</firstname><surname>Duncan</surname><orcid>0000-0002-9166-6195</orcid><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Philip</firstname><surname>Tucker</surname><orcid>0000-0002-8105-0901</orcid><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Lee Di</firstname><surname>Milia</surname><orcid>0000-0001-7681-5589</orcid><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Sally A.</firstname><surname>Ferguson</surname><orcid>0000-0002-9682-7971</orcid><order>8</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>69533__34314__deec36373d714ab6842509944f898238.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Easton 2025.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2025-05-20T09:40:11.7500429</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1726540</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2025 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
| spelling |
2025-07-30T14:58:12.6465562 v2 69533 2025-05-20 The relationship between circadian type and physical activity as predictors of cognitive performance during simulated nightshifts: A randomised controlled trial 7d07250cf5f1cbaf8788af9f48cf000a 0000-0002-8105-0901 Philip Tucker Philip Tucker true false 2025-05-20 PSYS Nightshift is associated with impaired cognitive performance on many tasks, yet performance is also moderated by individual differences. We investigated the effect of circadian type (two factors: flexible-rigid, and languid-vigour), and the efficacy of a novel countermeasure, breaking up sitting with light-intensity physical activity, in the context of nightshift performance. Thirty-three healthy adults (age M ± SD: 24.3 ± 4.6 y; 19 females) participated in a sleep laboratory study over five consecutive simulated nightshifts (2200–0600 h). Sleep opportunities occurred at 0800–1700 h. Participants were randomised to a sedentary (SIT; n = 14), or “breaking-up” sitting (BREAK; n = 19) condition. BREAK participants completed 3 min of light-intensity walking every 30 min at 3.2 km/h, while SIT participants remained seated. Every 2 h during nightshift, participants completed the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (mean RRT), Stroop Task, and Digit Symbol Substitution Task. Participants completed the revised Circadian Type Inventory which categorises individuals on a rigid-flexible scale and a languid-vigorous scale (rigid; n = 12, flexible; n = 11; languid; n = 11, vigorous n = 13). Linear mixed models showed a significant 3-way interaction between Nightshifts (1–5), Condition (SIT, BREAK), and flexibility-rigidity for mean RRT (p = 0.03) only. Flexible types in the BREAK condition had better performance than rigid BREAK, rigid SIT, and flexible SIT over five nights, with performance marginally worse on the first night for all participants apart from rigid SIT. Linear mixed models showed a significant 2-way interaction between Nightshifts (1–5), and flexibility-rigidity for percentage accuracy on the Stroop task, and a significant 2-way interaction between Nightshifts (1–5), and languid-vigour for response time on the Stroop task. Accuracy worsened for rigid types, while response time on the Stroop task improved for languid types over five nights. No other significant differences were found. Breaking up sitting with light-intensity physical activity maintained sustained attention for flexible circadian types across all five experimental nightshifts. Both rigidity and languidity moderated trends in performance, though whether these differences have meaningful real-world implications must be explored further. Our results indicate that circadian type classifications should be accounted for in breaking up sitting interventions overnight. Journal Article Chronobiology International 42 6 736 754 Informa UK Limited 0742-0528 1525-6073 Shift work; night shift; cognitive performance; fatigue countermeasure; physical activity; individual difference; circadian type 19 5 2025 2025-05-19 10.1080/07420528.2025.2503866 COLLEGE NANME Psychology School COLLEGE CODE PSYS Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (IA0802). 2025-07-30T14:58:12.6465562 2025-05-20T09:31:32.0420338 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Dayna Easton 0000-0003-4024-4336 1 Charlotte Gupta 0000-0003-2436-3327 2 Grace Vincent 0000-0002-7036-7823 3 Corneel Vandelanotte 0000-0002-4445-8094 4 Mitch Duncan 0000-0002-9166-6195 5 Philip Tucker 0000-0002-8105-0901 6 Lee Di Milia 0000-0001-7681-5589 7 Sally A. Ferguson 0000-0002-9682-7971 8 69533__34314__deec36373d714ab6842509944f898238.pdf Easton 2025.pdf 2025-05-20T09:40:11.7500429 Output 1726540 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2025 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| title |
The relationship between circadian type and physical activity as predictors of cognitive performance during simulated nightshifts: A randomised controlled trial |
| spellingShingle |
The relationship between circadian type and physical activity as predictors of cognitive performance during simulated nightshifts: A randomised controlled trial Philip Tucker |
| title_short |
The relationship between circadian type and physical activity as predictors of cognitive performance during simulated nightshifts: A randomised controlled trial |
| title_full |
The relationship between circadian type and physical activity as predictors of cognitive performance during simulated nightshifts: A randomised controlled trial |
| title_fullStr |
The relationship between circadian type and physical activity as predictors of cognitive performance during simulated nightshifts: A randomised controlled trial |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The relationship between circadian type and physical activity as predictors of cognitive performance during simulated nightshifts: A randomised controlled trial |
| title_sort |
The relationship between circadian type and physical activity as predictors of cognitive performance during simulated nightshifts: A randomised controlled trial |
| author_id_str_mv |
7d07250cf5f1cbaf8788af9f48cf000a |
| author_id_fullname_str_mv |
7d07250cf5f1cbaf8788af9f48cf000a_***_Philip Tucker |
| author |
Philip Tucker |
| author2 |
Dayna Easton Charlotte Gupta Grace Vincent Corneel Vandelanotte Mitch Duncan Philip Tucker Lee Di Milia Sally A. Ferguson |
| format |
Journal article |
| container_title |
Chronobiology International |
| container_volume |
42 |
| container_issue |
6 |
| container_start_page |
736 |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| institution |
Swansea University |
| issn |
0742-0528 1525-6073 |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1080/07420528.2025.2503866 |
| publisher |
Informa UK Limited |
| college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| hierarchytype |
|
| hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| department_str |
School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology |
| document_store_str |
1 |
| active_str |
0 |
| description |
Nightshift is associated with impaired cognitive performance on many tasks, yet performance is also moderated by individual differences. We investigated the effect of circadian type (two factors: flexible-rigid, and languid-vigour), and the efficacy of a novel countermeasure, breaking up sitting with light-intensity physical activity, in the context of nightshift performance. Thirty-three healthy adults (age M ± SD: 24.3 ± 4.6 y; 19 females) participated in a sleep laboratory study over five consecutive simulated nightshifts (2200–0600 h). Sleep opportunities occurred at 0800–1700 h. Participants were randomised to a sedentary (SIT; n = 14), or “breaking-up” sitting (BREAK; n = 19) condition. BREAK participants completed 3 min of light-intensity walking every 30 min at 3.2 km/h, while SIT participants remained seated. Every 2 h during nightshift, participants completed the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (mean RRT), Stroop Task, and Digit Symbol Substitution Task. Participants completed the revised Circadian Type Inventory which categorises individuals on a rigid-flexible scale and a languid-vigorous scale (rigid; n = 12, flexible; n = 11; languid; n = 11, vigorous n = 13). Linear mixed models showed a significant 3-way interaction between Nightshifts (1–5), Condition (SIT, BREAK), and flexibility-rigidity for mean RRT (p = 0.03) only. Flexible types in the BREAK condition had better performance than rigid BREAK, rigid SIT, and flexible SIT over five nights, with performance marginally worse on the first night for all participants apart from rigid SIT. Linear mixed models showed a significant 2-way interaction between Nightshifts (1–5), and flexibility-rigidity for percentage accuracy on the Stroop task, and a significant 2-way interaction between Nightshifts (1–5), and languid-vigour for response time on the Stroop task. Accuracy worsened for rigid types, while response time on the Stroop task improved for languid types over five nights. No other significant differences were found. Breaking up sitting with light-intensity physical activity maintained sustained attention for flexible circadian types across all five experimental nightshifts. Both rigidity and languidity moderated trends in performance, though whether these differences have meaningful real-world implications must be explored further. Our results indicate that circadian type classifications should be accounted for in breaking up sitting interventions overnight. |
| published_date |
2025-05-19T05:28:26Z |
| _version_ |
1851097881575948288 |
| score |
11.089386 |

