No Cover Image

Journal article 1370 views

Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: Is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer?

Christoph Weidemann, David E Huber, Richard M Shiffrin

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Volume: 34, Issue: 2, Pages: 257 - 281

Swansea University Author: Christoph Weidemann

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.257

Abstract

The authors conducted 4 repetition priming experiments that manipulated prime duration and prime diagnosticity in a visual forced-choice perceptual identification task. The strength and direction of prime diagnosticity produced marked effects on identification accuracy, but those effects were resist...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
ISSN: 1939-1285 0278-7393
Published: 2008
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa6928
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T11:55:50Z
last_indexed 2019-06-12T19:15:40Z
id cronfa6928
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-06-12T14:49:12.0859908</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>6928</id><entry>2012-01-28</entry><title>Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: Is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer?</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>b155eeefe08155214e70fea25649223c</sid><firstname>Christoph</firstname><surname>Weidemann</surname><name>Christoph Weidemann</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-01-28</date><deptcode>FGMHL</deptcode><abstract>The authors conducted 4 repetition priming experiments that manipulated prime duration and prime diagnosticity in a visual forced-choice perceptual identification task. The strength and direction of prime diagnosticity produced marked effects on identification accuracy, but those effects were resistant to subsequent changes of diagnosticity. Participants learned to associate different diagnosticities with primes of different durations but not with primes presented in different colors. Regardless of prime diagnosticity, preference for a primed alternative covaried negatively with prime duration, suggesting that even for diagnostic primes, evidence discounting remains an important factor. A computational model, with the assumption that adaptation to the statistics of the experiment modulates the level of evidence discounting, accounted for these results.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</journal><volume>34</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>257</paginationStart><paginationEnd>281</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>1939-1285</issnPrint><issnElectronic>0278-7393</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>3</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2008</publishedYear><publishedDate>2008-03-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.257</doi><url>http://cogsci.info/papers/WeidemannEtAl2008.pdf</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Medicine, Health and Life Science - Faculty</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>FGMHL</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-06-12T14:49:12.0859908</lastEdited><Created>2012-01-28T20:21:27.4630000</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Christoph</firstname><surname>Weidemann</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>David E</firstname><surname>Huber</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Richard M</firstname><surname>Shiffrin</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-06-12T14:49:12.0859908 v2 6928 2012-01-28 Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: Is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer? b155eeefe08155214e70fea25649223c Christoph Weidemann Christoph Weidemann true false 2012-01-28 FGMHL The authors conducted 4 repetition priming experiments that manipulated prime duration and prime diagnosticity in a visual forced-choice perceptual identification task. The strength and direction of prime diagnosticity produced marked effects on identification accuracy, but those effects were resistant to subsequent changes of diagnosticity. Participants learned to associate different diagnosticities with primes of different durations but not with primes presented in different colors. Regardless of prime diagnosticity, preference for a primed alternative covaried negatively with prime duration, suggesting that even for diagnostic primes, evidence discounting remains an important factor. A computational model, with the assumption that adaptation to the statistics of the experiment modulates the level of evidence discounting, accounted for these results. Journal Article Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34 2 257 281 1939-1285 0278-7393 31 3 2008 2008-03-31 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.257 http://cogsci.info/papers/WeidemannEtAl2008.pdf COLLEGE NANME Medicine, Health and Life Science - Faculty COLLEGE CODE FGMHL Swansea University 2019-06-12T14:49:12.0859908 2012-01-28T20:21:27.4630000 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Christoph Weidemann 1 David E Huber 2 Richard M Shiffrin 3
title Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: Is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer?
spellingShingle Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: Is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer?
Christoph Weidemann
title_short Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: Is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer?
title_full Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: Is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer?
title_fullStr Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: Is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer?
title_full_unstemmed Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: Is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer?
title_sort Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: Is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer?
author_id_str_mv b155eeefe08155214e70fea25649223c
author_id_fullname_str_mv b155eeefe08155214e70fea25649223c_***_Christoph Weidemann
author Christoph Weidemann
author2 Christoph Weidemann
David E Huber
Richard M Shiffrin
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
container_volume 34
container_issue 2
container_start_page 257
publishDate 2008
institution Swansea University
issn 1939-1285
0278-7393
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.257
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
url http://cogsci.info/papers/WeidemannEtAl2008.pdf
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description The authors conducted 4 repetition priming experiments that manipulated prime duration and prime diagnosticity in a visual forced-choice perceptual identification task. The strength and direction of prime diagnosticity produced marked effects on identification accuracy, but those effects were resistant to subsequent changes of diagnosticity. Participants learned to associate different diagnosticities with primes of different durations but not with primes presented in different colors. Regardless of prime diagnosticity, preference for a primed alternative covaried negatively with prime duration, suggesting that even for diagnostic primes, evidence discounting remains an important factor. A computational model, with the assumption that adaptation to the statistics of the experiment modulates the level of evidence discounting, accounted for these results.
published_date 2008-03-31T03:08:33Z
_version_ 1763749830343000064
score 11.037056

Similar Items