Journal article 148 views 41 downloads
Scholarly Discourse on GenAI’s Impact on Academic Publishing
,
Laurie Hughes,
Mousa Ahmed Albashrawi
Journal of Computer Information Systems, Pages: 1 - 16
Swansea University Authors:
Yogesh Dwivedi, Tegwen Malik
-
PDF | Accepted Manuscript
Author accepted manuscript document released under the terms of a Creative Commons CC-BY licence using the Swansea University Research Publications Policy (rights retention).
Download (419.79KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1080/08874417.2024.2435386
Abstract
This multidisciplinary and multi-perspective review, based on more than 50 editorials and studies published in the last two years, explores the transformative impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on academic publishing. While GenAI has streamlined tasks such as summarizing literature...
| Published in: | Journal of Computer Information Systems |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0887-4417 2380-2057 |
| Published: |
Informa UK Limited
2024
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa68414 |
| Abstract: |
This multidisciplinary and multi-perspective review, based on more than 50 editorials and studies published in the last two years, explores the transformative impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on academic publishing. While GenAI has streamlined tasks such as summarizing literature and drafting manuscripts, it has also introduced significant ethical and practical challenges. Key concerns include authorship, where GenAI falls short of meeting intellectual or accountability criteria, as well as the increasing threat of plagiarism, originality issues, and the spread of misinformation. The review also highlights biases embedded in GenAI generated content and the implications for academic fairness and inclusivity. Additionally, it addresses transparency and accountability challenges in AI use within academic environments. Through a synthesis of these diverse perspectives and presentation of a model that posits an ecosystem that governs AI policy and publications, this review advocates for comprehensive guidelines and emphasizes the critical need for human oversight to ensure responsible AI use, balancing its potential efficiencies with the integrity and rigor of academic publishing. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
Artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; generative artificial intelligence; gen AI; publishing |
| College: |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| Start Page: |
1 |
| End Page: |
16 |