Journal article 12 views
Unification and mathematical explanation
Philosophical Studies, Volume: 178, Issue: 12, Pages: 3923 - 3943
Swansea University Author: Rob Fraser
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1007/s11098-021-01631-2
Abstract
This paper provides a sorely-needed evaluation of the view that mathematical explanations in science explain by unifying. Illustrating with some novel examples, I argue that the view is misguided. For believers in mathematical explanations in science, my discussion rules out one way of spelling out...
Published in: | Philosophical Studies |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0031-8116 1573-0883 |
Published: |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
2021
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa68390 |
first_indexed |
2024-11-29T13:46:47Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2025-01-13T20:34:29Z |
id |
cronfa68390 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2025-01-13T13:57:44.8170108</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>68390</id><entry>2024-11-29</entry><title>Unification and mathematical explanation</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>b672bd356b55dba1f5d104300a083215</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-1475-1863</ORCID><firstname>Rob</firstname><surname>Fraser</surname><name>Rob Fraser</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-11-29</date><deptcode>SOSS</deptcode><abstract>This paper provides a sorely-needed evaluation of the view that mathematical explanations in science explain by unifying. Illustrating with some novel examples, I argue that the view is misguided. For believers in mathematical explanations in science, my discussion rules out one way of spelling out how they work, bringing us one step closer to the right way. For non-believers, it contributes to a divide-and-conquer strategy for showing that there are no such explanations in science. My discussion also undermines the appeal to unifying power in support of the enhanced indispensability argument.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Philosophical Studies</journal><volume>178</volume><journalNumber>12</journalNumber><paginationStart>3923</paginationStart><paginationEnd>3943</paginationEnd><publisher>Springer Science and Business Media LLC</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0031-8116</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1573-0883</issnElectronic><keywords>Mathematical explanation; Unification; Explanatory power; Intuitions; Methodology</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-12-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1007/s11098-021-01631-2</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Social Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SOSS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders>British Academy</funders><projectreference>pf160035</projectreference><lastEdited>2025-01-13T13:57:44.8170108</lastEdited><Created>2024-11-29T11:36:58.6049131</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Rob</firstname><surname>Fraser</surname><orcid>0000-0002-1475-1863</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2025-01-13T13:57:44.8170108 v2 68390 2024-11-29 Unification and mathematical explanation b672bd356b55dba1f5d104300a083215 0000-0002-1475-1863 Rob Fraser Rob Fraser true false 2024-11-29 SOSS This paper provides a sorely-needed evaluation of the view that mathematical explanations in science explain by unifying. Illustrating with some novel examples, I argue that the view is misguided. For believers in mathematical explanations in science, my discussion rules out one way of spelling out how they work, bringing us one step closer to the right way. For non-believers, it contributes to a divide-and-conquer strategy for showing that there are no such explanations in science. My discussion also undermines the appeal to unifying power in support of the enhanced indispensability argument. Journal Article Philosophical Studies 178 12 3923 3943 Springer Science and Business Media LLC 0031-8116 1573-0883 Mathematical explanation; Unification; Explanatory power; Intuitions; Methodology 1 12 2021 2021-12-01 10.1007/s11098-021-01631-2 COLLEGE NANME Social Sciences School COLLEGE CODE SOSS Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee British Academy pf160035 2025-01-13T13:57:44.8170108 2024-11-29T11:36:58.6049131 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations Rob Fraser 0000-0002-1475-1863 1 |
title |
Unification and mathematical explanation |
spellingShingle |
Unification and mathematical explanation Rob Fraser |
title_short |
Unification and mathematical explanation |
title_full |
Unification and mathematical explanation |
title_fullStr |
Unification and mathematical explanation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Unification and mathematical explanation |
title_sort |
Unification and mathematical explanation |
author_id_str_mv |
b672bd356b55dba1f5d104300a083215 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
b672bd356b55dba1f5d104300a083215_***_Rob Fraser |
author |
Rob Fraser |
author2 |
Rob Fraser |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Philosophical Studies |
container_volume |
178 |
container_issue |
12 |
container_start_page |
3923 |
publishDate |
2021 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0031-8116 1573-0883 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11098-021-01631-2 |
publisher |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
This paper provides a sorely-needed evaluation of the view that mathematical explanations in science explain by unifying. Illustrating with some novel examples, I argue that the view is misguided. For believers in mathematical explanations in science, my discussion rules out one way of spelling out how they work, bringing us one step closer to the right way. For non-believers, it contributes to a divide-and-conquer strategy for showing that there are no such explanations in science. My discussion also undermines the appeal to unifying power in support of the enhanced indispensability argument. |
published_date |
2021-12-01T14:45:59Z |
_version_ |
1821417154276229120 |
score |
11.048064 |