Journal article 12 views
Mathematics and Explanatory Generality: Nothing but Cognitive Salience
Erkenntnis, Volume: 86, Issue: 5, Pages: 1119 - 1137
Swansea University Author: Rob Fraser
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1007/s10670-019-00146-x
Abstract
We demonstrate how real progress can be made in the debate surrounding the enhanced indispensability argument. Drawing on a counterfactual theory of explanation, well-motivated independently of the debate, we provide a novel analysis of ‘explanatory generality’ and how mathematics is involved in its...
Published in: | Erkenntnis |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-0106 1572-8420 |
Published: |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
2021
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa68388 |
first_indexed |
2024-11-29T13:46:46Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2025-01-13T20:34:28Z |
id |
cronfa68388 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2025-01-13T14:06:11.7797482</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>68388</id><entry>2024-11-29</entry><title>Mathematics and Explanatory Generality: Nothing but Cognitive Salience</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>b672bd356b55dba1f5d104300a083215</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-1475-1863</ORCID><firstname>Rob</firstname><surname>Fraser</surname><name>Rob Fraser</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-11-29</date><deptcode>SOSS</deptcode><abstract>We demonstrate how real progress can be made in the debate surrounding the enhanced indispensability argument. Drawing on a counterfactual theory of explanation, well-motivated independently of the debate, we provide a novel analysis of ‘explanatory generality’ and how mathematics is involved in its procurement. On our analysis, mathematics’ sole explanatory contribution to the procurement of explanatory generality is to make counterfactual information about physical dependencies easier to grasp and reason with for creatures like us. This gives precise content to key intuitions traded in the debate, regarding mathematics’ procurement of explanatory generality, and adjudicates unambiguously in favour of the nominalist, at least as far as explanatory generality is concerned.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Erkenntnis</journal><volume>86</volume><journalNumber>5</journalNumber><paginationStart>1119</paginationStart><paginationEnd>1137</paginationEnd><publisher>Springer Science and Business Media LLC</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0165-0106</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1572-8420</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>10</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-10-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1007/s10670-019-00146-x</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Social Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SOSS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders>British Academy (pf160035)</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-01-13T14:06:11.7797482</lastEdited><Created>2024-11-29T11:31:48.6294512</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Rob</firstname><surname>Fraser</surname><orcid>0000-0002-1475-1863</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Juha</firstname><surname>Saatsi</surname><order>2</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2025-01-13T14:06:11.7797482 v2 68388 2024-11-29 Mathematics and Explanatory Generality: Nothing but Cognitive Salience b672bd356b55dba1f5d104300a083215 0000-0002-1475-1863 Rob Fraser Rob Fraser true false 2024-11-29 SOSS We demonstrate how real progress can be made in the debate surrounding the enhanced indispensability argument. Drawing on a counterfactual theory of explanation, well-motivated independently of the debate, we provide a novel analysis of ‘explanatory generality’ and how mathematics is involved in its procurement. On our analysis, mathematics’ sole explanatory contribution to the procurement of explanatory generality is to make counterfactual information about physical dependencies easier to grasp and reason with for creatures like us. This gives precise content to key intuitions traded in the debate, regarding mathematics’ procurement of explanatory generality, and adjudicates unambiguously in favour of the nominalist, at least as far as explanatory generality is concerned. Journal Article Erkenntnis 86 5 1119 1137 Springer Science and Business Media LLC 0165-0106 1572-8420 1 10 2021 2021-10-01 10.1007/s10670-019-00146-x COLLEGE NANME Social Sciences School COLLEGE CODE SOSS Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee British Academy (pf160035) 2025-01-13T14:06:11.7797482 2024-11-29T11:31:48.6294512 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations Rob Fraser 0000-0002-1475-1863 1 Juha Saatsi 2 |
title |
Mathematics and Explanatory Generality: Nothing but Cognitive Salience |
spellingShingle |
Mathematics and Explanatory Generality: Nothing but Cognitive Salience Rob Fraser |
title_short |
Mathematics and Explanatory Generality: Nothing but Cognitive Salience |
title_full |
Mathematics and Explanatory Generality: Nothing but Cognitive Salience |
title_fullStr |
Mathematics and Explanatory Generality: Nothing but Cognitive Salience |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mathematics and Explanatory Generality: Nothing but Cognitive Salience |
title_sort |
Mathematics and Explanatory Generality: Nothing but Cognitive Salience |
author_id_str_mv |
b672bd356b55dba1f5d104300a083215 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
b672bd356b55dba1f5d104300a083215_***_Rob Fraser |
author |
Rob Fraser |
author2 |
Rob Fraser Juha Saatsi |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Erkenntnis |
container_volume |
86 |
container_issue |
5 |
container_start_page |
1119 |
publishDate |
2021 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0165-0106 1572-8420 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10670-019-00146-x |
publisher |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
We demonstrate how real progress can be made in the debate surrounding the enhanced indispensability argument. Drawing on a counterfactual theory of explanation, well-motivated independently of the debate, we provide a novel analysis of ‘explanatory generality’ and how mathematics is involved in its procurement. On our analysis, mathematics’ sole explanatory contribution to the procurement of explanatory generality is to make counterfactual information about physical dependencies easier to grasp and reason with for creatures like us. This gives precise content to key intuitions traded in the debate, regarding mathematics’ procurement of explanatory generality, and adjudicates unambiguously in favour of the nominalist, at least as far as explanatory generality is concerned. |
published_date |
2021-10-01T14:45:58Z |
_version_ |
1821417153794932736 |
score |
11.048129 |