No Cover Image

Journal article 553 views 103 downloads

The coevolution of cognition and sociality

Luca G. Hahn Orcid Logo, Andoni S. E. Sergiou Orcid Logo, Josh J. Arbon Orcid Logo, Ines Fuertbauer Orcid Logo, Andrew King Orcid Logo, Alex Thornton Orcid Logo

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Volume: 380, Issue: 1929

Swansea University Authors: Ines Fuertbauer Orcid Logo, Andrew King Orcid Logo

  • 68338.VoR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2025 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

    Download (661.63KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1098/rstb.2024.0110

Abstract

Cognition serves to resolve uncertainty. Living in social groups is widely seen as a source of uncertainty driving cognitive evolution, but sociality can also mitigate sources of uncertainty, reducing the need forcognition. Moreover, social systems are not simply external selection pressures, but ra...

Full description

Published in: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
ISSN: 0962-8436 1471-2970
Published: The Royal Society 2025
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa68338
Abstract: Cognition serves to resolve uncertainty. Living in social groups is widely seen as a source of uncertainty driving cognitive evolution, but sociality can also mitigate sources of uncertainty, reducing the need forcognition. Moreover, social systems are not simply external selection pressures, but rather arise from the decisions individuals make regarding who to interact with and how to behave. Thus, an understanding of how and why cognition evolves requires careful consideration of the co-evolutionary feedback loop between cognition and sociality. Here, we adopt ideas from information theory to evaluate how potential sources of uncertainty differ across species and social systems. Whereas cognitive research often focuses on identifying human-like abilities in other animals, we instead emphasise that animals need to make adaptive decisions to navigate socio-ecological trade-offs. These decisions can be viewed as feedback loops between perceiving and acting on information, which shape individuals’ immediate social interactions, and scale up to generate the structure of societies. Emerging group-level characteristics such as social structure, communication networks, and culture in turn produce the context in which decisions are made and so shape selection on the underlying cognitive processes. Thus, minds shape societies and societies shape minds.
Keywords: cognition, coevolutionary feedback loop, information, sociality, socio-ecological trade-off, uncertainty
College: Faculty of Science and Engineering
Funders: L.G.H. was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council-funded South West Biosciences Doctoral Training Partnership (DTP3: BB/T008741/1). A.T. was supported by a Leverhulme Trust grant (RGP-2020-170).
Issue: 1929