Journal article 261 views 95 downloads
Do environmental, social, and governance standards improve the bargaining power of bidders? An empirical investigation
Journal of Environmental Management, Volume: 373, Start page: 123468
Swansea University Author:
Tunyi Tunyi Abongeh
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2024 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Download (614.64KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123468
Abstract
Drawing from the bargaining power hypothesis, we investigate the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards on takeover premiums in the international takeover market. Using an international sample of 8336 mergers and acquisitions from 26 bidder countries between 2003 and 2021, w...
Published in: | Journal of Environmental Management |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0301-4797 1095-8630 |
Published: |
Elsevier BV
2025
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa68325 |
first_indexed |
2024-11-25T14:21:52Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2025-02-14T05:45:09Z |
id |
cronfa68325 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2025-02-13T15:15:20.2445165</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>68325</id><entry>2024-11-23</entry><title>Do environmental, social, and governance standards improve the bargaining power of bidders? An empirical investigation</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>eefe2792c8eed5b49feede33981dfa53</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-5761-931X</ORCID><firstname>Tunyi</firstname><surname>Tunyi Abongeh</surname><name>Tunyi Tunyi Abongeh</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-11-23</date><deptcode>CBAE</deptcode><abstract>Drawing from the bargaining power hypothesis, we investigate the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards on takeover premiums in the international takeover market. Using an international sample of 8336 mergers and acquisitions from 26 bidder countries between 2003 and 2021, we find that bidders with higher pre-deal ESG standards – ESG champions – pay lower premiums to win the bid auction, suggesting that better engagement of stakeholders provides higher bargaining power to ESG champions. Contrary to the stylized fact that bidders destroy shareholder value in mergers and acquisitions, the results show that all bidders are not the same, and those with higher ESG standards enjoy takeover benefits. We also show that board independence and minority shareholder protection are potential channels through which ESG champions pay fair premiums to targets. Finally, the results document that ESG champions select targets from dissimilar industries and engage in cross-border deals to strengthen their reputation among stakeholders. Our results pass several robustness tests and hold after addressing the endogeneity issue. Overall, our findings dispense new evidence on how ESG standards increase the bargaining power of focal firms to negotiate on better terms with targets.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Environmental Management</journal><volume>373</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>123468</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0301-4797</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1095-8630</issnElectronic><keywords>ESG standards; Takeover premiums; Bargaining power; Board independence; Minority shareholder protection</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2025</publishedYear><publishedDate>2025-01-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123468</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Management School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CBAE</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-02-13T15:15:20.2445165</lastEdited><Created>2024-11-23T12:51:31.5047074</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Management - Accounting and Finance</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Tanveer</firstname><surname>Hussain</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Tunyi</firstname><surname>Tunyi Abongeh</surname><orcid>0000-0002-5761-931X</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>68325__33323__0277473a654846b4af761e3c14d65200.pdf</filename><originalFilename>68325.VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2025-01-14T10:25:49.8662393</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>629390</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2024 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2025-02-13T15:15:20.2445165 v2 68325 2024-11-23 Do environmental, social, and governance standards improve the bargaining power of bidders? An empirical investigation eefe2792c8eed5b49feede33981dfa53 0000-0002-5761-931X Tunyi Tunyi Abongeh Tunyi Tunyi Abongeh true false 2024-11-23 CBAE Drawing from the bargaining power hypothesis, we investigate the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards on takeover premiums in the international takeover market. Using an international sample of 8336 mergers and acquisitions from 26 bidder countries between 2003 and 2021, we find that bidders with higher pre-deal ESG standards – ESG champions – pay lower premiums to win the bid auction, suggesting that better engagement of stakeholders provides higher bargaining power to ESG champions. Contrary to the stylized fact that bidders destroy shareholder value in mergers and acquisitions, the results show that all bidders are not the same, and those with higher ESG standards enjoy takeover benefits. We also show that board independence and minority shareholder protection are potential channels through which ESG champions pay fair premiums to targets. Finally, the results document that ESG champions select targets from dissimilar industries and engage in cross-border deals to strengthen their reputation among stakeholders. Our results pass several robustness tests and hold after addressing the endogeneity issue. Overall, our findings dispense new evidence on how ESG standards increase the bargaining power of focal firms to negotiate on better terms with targets. Journal Article Journal of Environmental Management 373 123468 Elsevier BV 0301-4797 1095-8630 ESG standards; Takeover premiums; Bargaining power; Board independence; Minority shareholder protection 1 1 2025 2025-01-01 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123468 COLLEGE NANME Management School COLLEGE CODE CBAE Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee 2025-02-13T15:15:20.2445165 2024-11-23T12:51:31.5047074 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Management - Accounting and Finance Tanveer Hussain 1 Tunyi Tunyi Abongeh 0000-0002-5761-931X 2 68325__33323__0277473a654846b4af761e3c14d65200.pdf 68325.VoR.pdf 2025-01-14T10:25:49.8662393 Output 629390 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2024 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
Do environmental, social, and governance standards improve the bargaining power of bidders? An empirical investigation |
spellingShingle |
Do environmental, social, and governance standards improve the bargaining power of bidders? An empirical investigation Tunyi Tunyi Abongeh |
title_short |
Do environmental, social, and governance standards improve the bargaining power of bidders? An empirical investigation |
title_full |
Do environmental, social, and governance standards improve the bargaining power of bidders? An empirical investigation |
title_fullStr |
Do environmental, social, and governance standards improve the bargaining power of bidders? An empirical investigation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do environmental, social, and governance standards improve the bargaining power of bidders? An empirical investigation |
title_sort |
Do environmental, social, and governance standards improve the bargaining power of bidders? An empirical investigation |
author_id_str_mv |
eefe2792c8eed5b49feede33981dfa53 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
eefe2792c8eed5b49feede33981dfa53_***_Tunyi Tunyi Abongeh |
author |
Tunyi Tunyi Abongeh |
author2 |
Tanveer Hussain Tunyi Tunyi Abongeh |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Journal of Environmental Management |
container_volume |
373 |
container_start_page |
123468 |
publishDate |
2025 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0301-4797 1095-8630 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123468 |
publisher |
Elsevier BV |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Management - Accounting and Finance{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Management - Accounting and Finance |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Drawing from the bargaining power hypothesis, we investigate the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards on takeover premiums in the international takeover market. Using an international sample of 8336 mergers and acquisitions from 26 bidder countries between 2003 and 2021, we find that bidders with higher pre-deal ESG standards – ESG champions – pay lower premiums to win the bid auction, suggesting that better engagement of stakeholders provides higher bargaining power to ESG champions. Contrary to the stylized fact that bidders destroy shareholder value in mergers and acquisitions, the results show that all bidders are not the same, and those with higher ESG standards enjoy takeover benefits. We also show that board independence and minority shareholder protection are potential channels through which ESG champions pay fair premiums to targets. Finally, the results document that ESG champions select targets from dissimilar industries and engage in cross-border deals to strengthen their reputation among stakeholders. Our results pass several robustness tests and hold after addressing the endogeneity issue. Overall, our findings dispense new evidence on how ESG standards increase the bargaining power of focal firms to negotiate on better terms with targets. |
published_date |
2025-01-01T07:38:46Z |
_version_ |
1836697388258951168 |
score |
11.067306 |