No Cover Image

Journal article 49 views

Alignment of Consumers’ Expected Brain Benefits from Food and Supplements with Measurable Cognitive Performance Tests

Hayley Young Orcid Logo, Alecia Cousins Orcid Logo, Carol Byrd-Bredbenner Orcid Logo, David Benton, Richard C. Gershon, Alyssa Ghirardelli Orcid Logo, Marie E. Latulippe Orcid Logo, Andrew Scholey Orcid Logo, Laura Wagstaff Orcid Logo

Nutrients, Volume: 16, Issue: 12, Start page: 1950

Swansea University Authors: Hayley Young Orcid Logo, Alecia Cousins Orcid Logo, David Benton

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.3390/nu16121950

Abstract

Consumers often cite cognitive improvements as reasons for making dietary changes or using dietary supplements, a motivation that if leveraged could greatly enhance public health. However, rarely is it considered whether standardized cognitive tests that are used in nutrition research are aligned to...

Full description

Published in: Nutrients
ISSN: 2072-6643
Published: MDPI AG 2024
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa68070
Abstract: Consumers often cite cognitive improvements as reasons for making dietary changes or using dietary supplements, a motivation that if leveraged could greatly enhance public health. However, rarely is it considered whether standardized cognitive tests that are used in nutrition research are aligned to outcomes of interest to the consumer. This knowledge gap presents a challenge to the scientific substantiation of nutrition-based cognitive health benefits. Here we combined focus group transcript review using reflexive thematic analysis and a multidisciplinary expert panel exercise to evaluate the applicability of cognitive performance tools/tasks for substantiating the specific cognitive benefits articulated by consumers with the objectives to (1) understand how consumers comprehend the potential benefits of nutrition for brain health, and (2) determine the alignment between consumers desired brain benefits and validated tests and tools. We derived a ‘Consumer Taxonomy of Cognitive and Affective Health in Nutrition Research’ which describes the cognitive and affective structure from the consumers perspective. Experts agreed that validated tests exist for some consumer benefits including focused attention, sustained attention, episodic memory, energy levels, and anxiety. Prospective memory, flow, and presence represented novel benefits that require the development and validation of new tests and tools. Closing the gap between science and consumers and fostering co-creative approaches to nutrition research are critical to the development of products and dietary recommendations that support realizable cognitive benefits that benefit public health.
Keywords: consumer terminology; mood; cognitive health; brain health; nutrition; diet; supplements; validated tests
College: Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
Funders: NORC received support for this work via grant IAFNS-NORC-20220719 and Alecia L Cousins and Hayley A Young received support for this work via grant IAFNS-COUSINSALECIA-20231020 from the Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences (IAFNS). Other authors received no funding. IAFNS is a nonprofit science organization that pools funding from industry and advances science through the in-kind and financial contributions from private and public sector members.
Issue: 12
Start Page: 1950