Journal article 118 views
The Populist Radical Right as Memory Entrepreneur? The Prominence, Sentiment, and Interpretations of History in the German Parliament
British Journal of Political Science, Pages: 1 - 22
Swansea University Author: Matthias Dilling
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1017/s0007123424000346
Abstract
Populist radical right (PRR) parties’ attacks against prevailing historical interpretations have received much public attention because they question the foundations of countries’ political orders. Yet, how prominent are such attacks, and what characterizes their sentiment and content? This article...
Published in: | British Journal of Political Science |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-1234 1469-2112 |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
2024
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa67406 |
first_indexed |
2024-09-09T15:47:17Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2024-11-29T19:45:22Z |
id |
cronfa67406 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2024-11-29T13:31:42.5126692</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>67406</id><entry>2024-08-16</entry><title>The Populist Radical Right as Memory Entrepreneur? The Prominence, Sentiment, and Interpretations of History in the German Parliament</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>8e4fa67a71b1eedda1ea5e8573903ac3</sid><firstname>Matthias</firstname><surname>Dilling</surname><name>Matthias Dilling</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-08-16</date><abstract>Populist radical right (PRR) parties’ attacks against prevailing historical interpretations have received much public attention because they question the foundations of countries’ political orders. Yet, how prominent are such attacks, and what characterizes their sentiment and content? This article proposes an integrated mixed-methods approach to investigate the prominence, sentiment, and interpretations of history in PRR politicians’ parliamentary speeches. Studying the case of Germany, we conduct a quantitative analysis of national parliamentary speeches (2017—2021), combined with a qualitative analysis of all speeches made by the Alternative for Germany (AfD) in 2017—2018. The AfD does not use historical markers more prominently but is distinctly less negative when speaking about history compared to its general political language. The collocation and qualitative analyses reveal the nuanced ways in which the AfD affirms and disavows various mnemonic traditions, underlining the PRR’s complex engagement with established norms.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>British Journal of Political Science</journal><volume>0</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>1</paginationStart><paginationEnd>22</paginationEnd><publisher>Cambridge University Press (CUP)</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0007-1234</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1469-2112</issnElectronic><keywords>populist radical right; memory politics; sentiment; text analysis; Germany</keywords><publishedDay>20</publishedDay><publishedMonth>11</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-11-20</publishedDate><doi>10.1017/s0007123424000346</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal)</apcterm><funders>Swansea University</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-11-29T13:31:42.5126692</lastEdited><Created>2024-08-16T16:41:27.1388475</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Matthias</firstname><surname>Dilling</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Félix</firstname><surname>Krawatzek</surname><orcid>0000-0002-1108-6087</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2024-11-29T13:31:42.5126692 v2 67406 2024-08-16 The Populist Radical Right as Memory Entrepreneur? The Prominence, Sentiment, and Interpretations of History in the German Parliament 8e4fa67a71b1eedda1ea5e8573903ac3 Matthias Dilling Matthias Dilling true false 2024-08-16 Populist radical right (PRR) parties’ attacks against prevailing historical interpretations have received much public attention because they question the foundations of countries’ political orders. Yet, how prominent are such attacks, and what characterizes their sentiment and content? This article proposes an integrated mixed-methods approach to investigate the prominence, sentiment, and interpretations of history in PRR politicians’ parliamentary speeches. Studying the case of Germany, we conduct a quantitative analysis of national parliamentary speeches (2017—2021), combined with a qualitative analysis of all speeches made by the Alternative for Germany (AfD) in 2017—2018. The AfD does not use historical markers more prominently but is distinctly less negative when speaking about history compared to its general political language. The collocation and qualitative analyses reveal the nuanced ways in which the AfD affirms and disavows various mnemonic traditions, underlining the PRR’s complex engagement with established norms. Journal Article British Journal of Political Science 0 1 22 Cambridge University Press (CUP) 0007-1234 1469-2112 populist radical right; memory politics; sentiment; text analysis; Germany 20 11 2024 2024-11-20 10.1017/s0007123424000346 COLLEGE NANME COLLEGE CODE Swansea University SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal) Swansea University 2024-11-29T13:31:42.5126692 2024-08-16T16:41:27.1388475 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations Matthias Dilling 1 Félix Krawatzek 0000-0002-1108-6087 2 |
title |
The Populist Radical Right as Memory Entrepreneur? The Prominence, Sentiment, and Interpretations of History in the German Parliament |
spellingShingle |
The Populist Radical Right as Memory Entrepreneur? The Prominence, Sentiment, and Interpretations of History in the German Parliament Matthias Dilling |
title_short |
The Populist Radical Right as Memory Entrepreneur? The Prominence, Sentiment, and Interpretations of History in the German Parliament |
title_full |
The Populist Radical Right as Memory Entrepreneur? The Prominence, Sentiment, and Interpretations of History in the German Parliament |
title_fullStr |
The Populist Radical Right as Memory Entrepreneur? The Prominence, Sentiment, and Interpretations of History in the German Parliament |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Populist Radical Right as Memory Entrepreneur? The Prominence, Sentiment, and Interpretations of History in the German Parliament |
title_sort |
The Populist Radical Right as Memory Entrepreneur? The Prominence, Sentiment, and Interpretations of History in the German Parliament |
author_id_str_mv |
8e4fa67a71b1eedda1ea5e8573903ac3 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
8e4fa67a71b1eedda1ea5e8573903ac3_***_Matthias Dilling |
author |
Matthias Dilling |
author2 |
Matthias Dilling Félix Krawatzek |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
British Journal of Political Science |
container_volume |
0 |
container_start_page |
1 |
publishDate |
2024 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0007-1234 1469-2112 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1017/s0007123424000346 |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Populist radical right (PRR) parties’ attacks against prevailing historical interpretations have received much public attention because they question the foundations of countries’ political orders. Yet, how prominent are such attacks, and what characterizes their sentiment and content? This article proposes an integrated mixed-methods approach to investigate the prominence, sentiment, and interpretations of history in PRR politicians’ parliamentary speeches. Studying the case of Germany, we conduct a quantitative analysis of national parliamentary speeches (2017—2021), combined with a qualitative analysis of all speeches made by the Alternative for Germany (AfD) in 2017—2018. The AfD does not use historical markers more prominently but is distinctly less negative when speaking about history compared to its general political language. The collocation and qualitative analyses reveal the nuanced ways in which the AfD affirms and disavows various mnemonic traditions, underlining the PRR’s complex engagement with established norms. |
published_date |
2024-11-20T02:51:38Z |
_version_ |
1821372211143901184 |
score |
11.04748 |