Journal article 134 views 16 downloads
The day after mowing: Time and type of mowing influence grassland arthropods
,
Michael Staab ,
Margarita Hartlieb ,
Nadja K. Simons ,
Konstans Wells ,
Martin M. Gossner ,
Juliane Vogt,
Rafael Achury ,
Sebastian Seibold ,
Andreas Hemp ,
Wolfgang W. Weisser ,
Nico Blüthgen
Ecological Applications, Volume: 34, Issue: 6
Swansea University Author:
Konstans Wells
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License.
Download (1.77MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1002/eap.3022
Abstract
Recent losses in the abundance and diversity of arthropods have been documented in many regions and ecosystems. In grasslands, such insect declines are largely attributed to land use, including modern machinery and mowing regimes. However, the effects of different mowing techniques on arthropods rem...
| Published in: | Ecological Applications |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1051-0761 1939-5582 |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa67327 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract: |
Recent losses in the abundance and diversity of arthropods have been documented in many regions and ecosystems. In grasslands, such insect declines are largely attributed to land use, including modern machinery and mowing regimes. However, the effects of different mowing techniques on arthropods remain poorly understood. Using 11 years of data from 111 agricultural grassland plots across Germany, we analyzed the influence of various grassland management variables on the abundance and abundance-accounted species richness of four arthropod orders: Araneae, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, and Orthoptera. The analysis focused on detailed mowing information, for example, days after mowing and mower type, and compared their effect with other aspects of grassland management, that is, rolling, leveling, fertilization, and grazing. We found strong negative effects of mowing on all four arthropod orders, with arthropod abundance being lowest directly after mowing and steadily increasing to three to seven times the abundance after 100 days post-mowing. Likewise, Hemiptera and Coleoptera species richness was 30% higher 100 days after mowing. Mower width showed a positive effect on Orthoptera abundance, but not on the other arthropods. Arthropod abundance and Coleoptera species richness were lowest when a mulcher was used compared to rotary or bar mowers. In addition to mowing, intensive grazing negatively affected Orthoptera abundance but not the other orders. Mowing represents a highly disturbing and iterative stressor with negative effects on arthropod abundance and diversity, likely contributed by mowing-induced mortality and habitat alteration. While modifications of mowing techniques such as mower type or mowing height and width may help to reduce the negative impact of mowing on arthropods, our results show that mowing itself has the most substantial negative effect. Based on our results, we suggest that reduced mowing frequency, omission of mowing in parts of the grassland (refuges), or extensive grazing instead of mowing have the greatest potential to promote arthropod populations. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
Grassland management, grazing, insect conservation, mower, mowing width, mulcher, rolling |
| College: |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| Funders: |
This work has been partly funded by the DFG Priority Program 1374 “Biodiversity-Exploratories” (DFG-Refno.) and is part of the BioDivKultur project, which is funded by FEdA, the BMBF Research Initiative for the Conservation of Biodiversity. Fieldwork permits were issued by the responsible state environmental offices of Baden-Württemberg, Thüringen, and Brandenburg. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. |
| Issue: |
6 |