Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production

Qiao, Yuanting; Liu, Weishan; Guo, Ruonan; Sun, Shuzhuang; Zhang, Shuming; Bailey, Josh J.; Fang, Mengxiang; Wu, Chunfei

doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125972

Journal article 101 views 46 downloads

Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production

Yuanting Qiao

, Weishan Liu, Ruonan Guo, Shuzhuang Sun, Shuming Zhang, Josh J. Bailey, Mengxiang Fang, Chunfei Wu

Fuel, Volume: 332, Start page: 125972

Swansea University Author: Yuanting Qiao

PDF | Version of Record

© 2022 The Authors.This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Download (2MB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125972

Abstract

Currently, excessive CO2 emissions have become a global challenge due to their influence on the climate. According to the Paris Agreement, global warming should be limited to 1.5 °C by 2100. Carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) are attractive as they can both reduce CO2 content and utilise CO2 as a...

Full description

Published in:	Fuel
ISSN:	0016-2361
Published:	Elsevier BV 2023
Online Access:	Check full text
URI:	https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa67096
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

first_indexed	2024-08-30T12:19:34Z
last_indexed	2024-08-30T12:19:34Z
id	cronfa67096
recordtype	SURis
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>67096</id><entry>2024-07-15</entry><title>Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>ceae57100ecb7c4b2883e29079a8985d</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-7741-9278</ORCID><firstname>Yuanting</firstname><surname>Qiao</surname><name>Yuanting Qiao</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-07-15</date><deptcode>EAAS</deptcode><abstract>Currently, excessive CO2 emissions have become a global challenge due to their influence on the climate. According to the Paris Agreement, global warming should be limited to 1.5 °C by 2100. Carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) are attractive as they can both reduce CO2 content and utilise CO2 as a carbon resource. However, in conventional CCU processes, CO2 needs first to be extracted and purified for the following utilisation. In contrast, the recently reported Integrated Carbon Capture and Utilisation (ICCU) was designed to realise the overall process in one reactor, where CO2 is captured by adsorbents (e.g., CaO) and utilised in-situ with the introduction of a reducing agent (e.g., H2). This ICCU technology can promote CO2 conversion with fewer intermediate steps, leading to a reduction in overall cost. Energy and economic analysis of ICCU are thus urgently required. According to several recent research, the operational cost of ICCU has been reported to be cheaper than that of CCU. However, a comprehensive view of ICCU is still expected due to further application. This paper focuses on comparing ICCU and conventional CCU processes based on Aspen simulations covering mass balance (i.e., CaCO3 consumption, purge production, annual CO production), energy balance, the total annual cost and the CO cost, etc. Analysis shows that the ICCU process can produce more CO (1.20 Mt year−1), less purge (0.21 Mt year−1), and less consumption of CaCO3 (0.62 Mt year−1) with higher energy efficiency (37.1 %) than the CCU process. The results also show that the total annual cost of ICCU is $867.07 million, corresponding to a total cost of CO of $720.25 per tonne. In contrast, CCU has higher costs, with a total annual cost of $1027.61 million and a total cost of CO of $1004.53 per tonne. The Cost of CO2 Avoided of ICCU (317.11$/ton) is much lower than that CCU (1230.27 $/ton). Therefore, ICCU was confirmed as a better choice for further industrial applications. In addition, H2 is shown to have a significant influence on economic performance, which remains a challenge for further application.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Fuel</journal><volume>332</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>125972</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0016-2361</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>Integrated CO2 capture and utilisation; CO2 capture and utilisation; Techno-economic analysis; Aspen simulation</keywords><publishedDay>15</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-01-15</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125972</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Engineering and Applied Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>EAAS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the China Scholarship Council (Student number: 201706880031). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 823745.</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-08-30T13:22:06.0080224</lastEdited><Created>2024-07-15T11:13:11.5078991</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Yuanting</firstname><surname>Qiao</surname><orcid>0000-0002-7741-9278</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Weishan</firstname><surname>Liu</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Ruonan</firstname><surname>Guo</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Shuzhuang</firstname><surname>Sun</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Shuming</firstname><surname>Zhang</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Josh J.</firstname><surname>Bailey</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Mengxiang</firstname><surname>Fang</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Chunfei</firstname><surname>Wu</surname><order>8</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>67096__31187__d75afd0d3069444d839927d4b98ae7c8.pdf</filename><originalFilename>67096.VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2024-08-30T13:20:11.5769982</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>2096217</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2022 The Authors.This is an open access article under the CC BY license.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling	v2 67096 2024-07-15 Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production ceae57100ecb7c4b2883e29079a8985d 0000-0002-7741-9278 Yuanting Qiao Yuanting Qiao true false 2024-07-15 EAAS Currently, excessive CO2 emissions have become a global challenge due to their influence on the climate. According to the Paris Agreement, global warming should be limited to 1.5 °C by 2100. Carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) are attractive as they can both reduce CO2 content and utilise CO2 as a carbon resource. However, in conventional CCU processes, CO2 needs first to be extracted and purified for the following utilisation. In contrast, the recently reported Integrated Carbon Capture and Utilisation (ICCU) was designed to realise the overall process in one reactor, where CO2 is captured by adsorbents (e.g., CaO) and utilised in-situ with the introduction of a reducing agent (e.g., H2). This ICCU technology can promote CO2 conversion with fewer intermediate steps, leading to a reduction in overall cost. Energy and economic analysis of ICCU are thus urgently required. According to several recent research, the operational cost of ICCU has been reported to be cheaper than that of CCU. However, a comprehensive view of ICCU is still expected due to further application. This paper focuses on comparing ICCU and conventional CCU processes based on Aspen simulations covering mass balance (i.e., CaCO3 consumption, purge production, annual CO production), energy balance, the total annual cost and the CO cost, etc. Analysis shows that the ICCU process can produce more CO (1.20 Mt year−1), less purge (0.21 Mt year−1), and less consumption of CaCO3 (0.62 Mt year−1) with higher energy efficiency (37.1 %) than the CCU process. The results also show that the total annual cost of ICCU is $867.07 million, corresponding to a total cost of CO of $720.25 per tonne. In contrast, CCU has higher costs, with a total annual cost of $1027.61 million and a total cost of CO of $1004.53 per tonne. The Cost of CO2 Avoided of ICCU (317.11$/ton) is much lower than that CCU (1230.27 $/ton). Therefore, ICCU was confirmed as a better choice for further industrial applications. In addition, H2 is shown to have a significant influence on economic performance, which remains a challenge for further application. Journal Article Fuel 332 125972 Elsevier BV 0016-2361 Integrated CO2 capture and utilisation; CO2 capture and utilisation; Techno-economic analysis; Aspen simulation 15 1 2023 2023-01-15 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125972 COLLEGE NANME Engineering and Applied Sciences School COLLEGE CODE EAAS Swansea University The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the China Scholarship Council (Student number: 201706880031). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 823745. 2024-08-30T13:22:06.0080224 2024-07-15T11:13:11.5078991 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering Yuanting Qiao 0000-0002-7741-9278 1 Weishan Liu 2 Ruonan Guo 3 Shuzhuang Sun 4 Shuming Zhang 5 Josh J. Bailey 6 Mengxiang Fang 7 Chunfei Wu 8 67096__31187__d75afd0d3069444d839927d4b98ae7c8.pdf 67096.VoR.pdf 2024-08-30T13:20:11.5769982 Output 2096217 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2022 The Authors.This is an open access article under the CC BY license. true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title	Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production
spellingShingle	Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production Yuanting Qiao
title_short	Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production
title_full	Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production
title_fullStr	Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production
title_full_unstemmed	Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production
title_sort	Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production
author_id_str_mv	ceae57100ecb7c4b2883e29079a8985d
author_id_fullname_str_mv	ceae57100ecb7c4b2883e29079a8985d_***_Yuanting Qiao
author	Yuanting Qiao
author2	Yuanting Qiao Weishan Liu Ruonan Guo Shuzhuang Sun Shuming Zhang Josh J. Bailey Mengxiang Fang Chunfei Wu
format	Journal article
container_title	Fuel
container_volume	332
container_start_page	125972
publishDate	2023
institution	Swansea University
issn	0016-2361
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125972
publisher	Elsevier BV
college_str	Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id	facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title	Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id	facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title	Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str	School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering
document_store_str	1
active_str	0
description	Currently, excessive CO2 emissions have become a global challenge due to their influence on the climate. According to the Paris Agreement, global warming should be limited to 1.5 °C by 2100. Carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) are attractive as they can both reduce CO2 content and utilise CO2 as a carbon resource. However, in conventional CCU processes, CO2 needs first to be extracted and purified for the following utilisation. In contrast, the recently reported Integrated Carbon Capture and Utilisation (ICCU) was designed to realise the overall process in one reactor, where CO2 is captured by adsorbents (e.g., CaO) and utilised in-situ with the introduction of a reducing agent (e.g., H2). This ICCU technology can promote CO2 conversion with fewer intermediate steps, leading to a reduction in overall cost. Energy and economic analysis of ICCU are thus urgently required. According to several recent research, the operational cost of ICCU has been reported to be cheaper than that of CCU. However, a comprehensive view of ICCU is still expected due to further application. This paper focuses on comparing ICCU and conventional CCU processes based on Aspen simulations covering mass balance (i.e., CaCO3 consumption, purge production, annual CO production), energy balance, the total annual cost and the CO cost, etc. Analysis shows that the ICCU process can produce more CO (1.20 Mt year−1), less purge (0.21 Mt year−1), and less consumption of CaCO3 (0.62 Mt year−1) with higher energy efficiency (37.1 %) than the CCU process. The results also show that the total annual cost of ICCU is $867.07 million, corresponding to a total cost of CO of $720.25 per tonne. In contrast, CCU has higher costs, with a total annual cost of $1027.61 million and a total cost of CO of $1004.53 per tonne. The Cost of CO2 Avoided of ICCU (317.11$/ton) is much lower than that CCU (1230.27 $/ton). Therefore, ICCU was confirmed as a better choice for further industrial applications. In addition, H2 is shown to have a significant influence on economic performance, which remains a challenge for further application.
published_date	2023-01-15T13:22:06Z
_version_	1808815123223019520
score	11.037253

Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production

Similar Items