No Cover Image

Journal article 14 views

A symptom guided diagnosis of prosopagnosia is valid: a commentary on DeGutis et al. (2023)

Edwin Burns Orcid Logo

PsyArXiv Preprints

Swansea University Author: Edwin Burns Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

DOI (Published version): 10.31234/osf.io/9aqdf

Abstract

DeGutis et al. (2023) rejected Burns et al.'s (2022) symptom guided approach to diagnosing prosopagnosia due to various criticisms. In this commentary, I argue that the symptom guided approach is a valid method for diagnosing prosopagnosia, and demonstrate why DeGutis and colleagues' (2023...

Full description

Published in: PsyArXiv Preprints
Published: Center for Open Science
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa66617
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2024-07-24T12:52:23Z
last_indexed 2024-07-24T12:52:23Z
id cronfa66617
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>66617</id><entry>2024-06-10</entry><title>A symptom guided diagnosis of prosopagnosia is valid: a commentary on DeGutis et al. (2023)</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>fd2ee0c494abf5744c49ab6dd1f034bc</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-5938-5457</ORCID><firstname>Edwin</firstname><surname>Burns</surname><name>Edwin Burns</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-06-10</date><deptcode>PSYS</deptcode><abstract>DeGutis et al. (2023) rejected Burns et al.'s (2022) symptom guided approach to diagnosing prosopagnosia due to various criticisms. In this commentary, I argue that the symptom guided approach is a valid method for diagnosing prosopagnosia, and demonstrate why DeGutis and colleagues' (2023) arguments against the symptom based approach can instead be rejected.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>PsyArXiv Preprints</journal><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Center for Open Science</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>0</publishedDay><publishedMonth>0</publishedMonth><publishedYear>0</publishedYear><publishedDate>0001-01-01</publishedDate><doi>10.31234/osf.io/9aqdf</doi><url/><notes>Preprint article before certification by peer review.</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>PSYS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-07-24T13:52:23.9826026</lastEdited><Created>2024-06-10T09:09:40.5305228</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Edwin</firstname><surname>Burns</surname><orcid>0000-0002-5938-5457</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling v2 66617 2024-06-10 A symptom guided diagnosis of prosopagnosia is valid: a commentary on DeGutis et al. (2023) fd2ee0c494abf5744c49ab6dd1f034bc 0000-0002-5938-5457 Edwin Burns Edwin Burns true false 2024-06-10 PSYS DeGutis et al. (2023) rejected Burns et al.'s (2022) symptom guided approach to diagnosing prosopagnosia due to various criticisms. In this commentary, I argue that the symptom guided approach is a valid method for diagnosing prosopagnosia, and demonstrate why DeGutis and colleagues' (2023) arguments against the symptom based approach can instead be rejected. Journal Article PsyArXiv Preprints Center for Open Science 0 0 0 0001-01-01 10.31234/osf.io/9aqdf Preprint article before certification by peer review. COLLEGE NANME Psychology School COLLEGE CODE PSYS Swansea University 2024-07-24T13:52:23.9826026 2024-06-10T09:09:40.5305228 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Edwin Burns 0000-0002-5938-5457 1
title A symptom guided diagnosis of prosopagnosia is valid: a commentary on DeGutis et al. (2023)
spellingShingle A symptom guided diagnosis of prosopagnosia is valid: a commentary on DeGutis et al. (2023)
Edwin Burns
title_short A symptom guided diagnosis of prosopagnosia is valid: a commentary on DeGutis et al. (2023)
title_full A symptom guided diagnosis of prosopagnosia is valid: a commentary on DeGutis et al. (2023)
title_fullStr A symptom guided diagnosis of prosopagnosia is valid: a commentary on DeGutis et al. (2023)
title_full_unstemmed A symptom guided diagnosis of prosopagnosia is valid: a commentary on DeGutis et al. (2023)
title_sort A symptom guided diagnosis of prosopagnosia is valid: a commentary on DeGutis et al. (2023)
author_id_str_mv fd2ee0c494abf5744c49ab6dd1f034bc
author_id_fullname_str_mv fd2ee0c494abf5744c49ab6dd1f034bc_***_Edwin Burns
author Edwin Burns
author2 Edwin Burns
format Journal article
container_title PsyArXiv Preprints
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.31234/osf.io/9aqdf
publisher Center for Open Science
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description DeGutis et al. (2023) rejected Burns et al.'s (2022) symptom guided approach to diagnosing prosopagnosia due to various criticisms. In this commentary, I argue that the symptom guided approach is a valid method for diagnosing prosopagnosia, and demonstrate why DeGutis and colleagues' (2023) arguments against the symptom based approach can instead be rejected.
published_date 0001-01-01T13:52:23Z
_version_ 1805464940605079552
score 11.017776

Similar Items