No Cover Image

Journal article 219 views 130 downloads

Specific performance and unascertained goods : A special case or not?

Andrew Tettenborn Orcid Logo

Journal of Business Law

Swansea University Author: Andrew Tettenborn Orcid Logo

  • spdiscr2.pdf

    PDF | Accepted Manuscript

    Author accepted manuscript document released under the terms of a Creative Commons CC-BY licence using the Swansea University Research Publications Policy (rights retention).

    Download (189.7KB)

Abstract

Recent authorities have suggested that a fundamental distinction is drawn between specific and ascertained goods on the one hand, and unascertained goods on the other, as regards the availability of specific performance. This article suggests that the distinction is illogical, misguided and unsuppor...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Business Law
Published:
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa66507
first_indexed 2024-06-10T15:22:38Z
last_indexed 2024-11-25T14:18:17Z
id cronfa66507
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2024-10-30T15:54:59.8188150</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>66507</id><entry>2024-05-24</entry><title>Specific performance and unascertained goods : A special case or not?</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>32453c4882e72f12ae003e34742302d2</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-8025-5630</ORCID><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Tettenborn</surname><name>Andrew Tettenborn</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-05-24</date><deptcode>HRCL</deptcode><abstract>Recent authorities have suggested that a fundamental distinction is drawn between specific and ascertained goods on the one hand, and unascertained goods on the other, as regards the availability of specific performance. This article suggests that the distinction is illogical, misguided and unsupported by respectable authority.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Business Law</journal><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>0</publishedDay><publishedMonth>0</publishedMonth><publishedYear>0</publishedYear><publishedDate>0001-01-01</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HRCL</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Not Required</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-10-30T15:54:59.8188150</lastEdited><Created>2024-05-24T09:44:16.0720931</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Tettenborn</surname><orcid>0000-0002-8025-5630</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>66507__30454__4428812e470849688110f8745dbd851c.pdf</filename><originalFilename>spdiscr2.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2024-05-24T09:50:10.6071128</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>194248</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2024-06-24T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><documentNotes>Author accepted manuscript document released under the terms of a Creative Commons CC-BY licence using the Swansea University Research Publications Policy (rights retention).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2024-10-30T15:54:59.8188150 v2 66507 2024-05-24 Specific performance and unascertained goods : A special case or not? 32453c4882e72f12ae003e34742302d2 0000-0002-8025-5630 Andrew Tettenborn Andrew Tettenborn true false 2024-05-24 HRCL Recent authorities have suggested that a fundamental distinction is drawn between specific and ascertained goods on the one hand, and unascertained goods on the other, as regards the availability of specific performance. This article suggests that the distinction is illogical, misguided and unsupported by respectable authority. Journal Article Journal of Business Law 0 0 0 0001-01-01 COLLEGE NANME Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School COLLEGE CODE HRCL Swansea University Not Required 2024-10-30T15:54:59.8188150 2024-05-24T09:44:16.0720931 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Andrew Tettenborn 0000-0002-8025-5630 1 66507__30454__4428812e470849688110f8745dbd851c.pdf spdiscr2.pdf 2024-05-24T09:50:10.6071128 Output 194248 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2024-06-24T00:00:00.0000000 Author accepted manuscript document released under the terms of a Creative Commons CC-BY licence using the Swansea University Research Publications Policy (rights retention). true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
title Specific performance and unascertained goods : A special case or not?
spellingShingle Specific performance and unascertained goods : A special case or not?
Andrew Tettenborn
title_short Specific performance and unascertained goods : A special case or not?
title_full Specific performance and unascertained goods : A special case or not?
title_fullStr Specific performance and unascertained goods : A special case or not?
title_full_unstemmed Specific performance and unascertained goods : A special case or not?
title_sort Specific performance and unascertained goods : A special case or not?
author_id_str_mv 32453c4882e72f12ae003e34742302d2
author_id_fullname_str_mv 32453c4882e72f12ae003e34742302d2_***_Andrew Tettenborn
author Andrew Tettenborn
author2 Andrew Tettenborn
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Business Law
institution Swansea University
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Recent authorities have suggested that a fundamental distinction is drawn between specific and ascertained goods on the one hand, and unascertained goods on the other, as regards the availability of specific performance. This article suggests that the distinction is illogical, misguided and unsupported by respectable authority.
published_date 0001-01-01T05:35:42Z
_version_ 1821382533212798976
score 11.04748

Similar Items