No Cover Image

Journal article 116 views 24 downloads

Difference and diversity: Combining multiculturalist and interculturalist approaches to integration

Thomas Sealy, Pier-Luc Dupont Picard Orcid Logo, Tariq Modood

The Sociological Review

Swansea University Author: Pier-Luc Dupont Picard Orcid Logo

  • 65927.VOR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © The Author(s) 2024. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

    Download (149.39KB)

Abstract

Multiculturalism (MC) and interculturalism (IC) as approaches to governing ethnic diversity have developed an often antagonistic relationship, borne out through scholarly as well as political debates. Yet, increasingly, scholars have begun to note that while IC-consistent policies have gained some p...

Full description

Published in: The Sociological Review
ISSN: 0038-0261 1467-954X
Published: SAGE Publications 2024
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa65927
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2024-03-28T10:48:39Z
last_indexed 2024-03-28T10:48:39Z
id cronfa65927
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>65927</id><entry>2024-03-28</entry><title>Difference and diversity: Combining multiculturalist and interculturalist approaches to integration</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>a8843d62ec83157f25d4bc7935e1479e</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-1610-4667</ORCID><firstname>Pier-Luc</firstname><surname>Dupont Picard</surname><name>Pier-Luc Dupont Picard</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-03-28</date><deptcode>APC</deptcode><abstract>Multiculturalism (MC) and interculturalism (IC) as approaches to governing ethnic diversity have developed an often antagonistic relationship, borne out through scholarly as well as political debates. Yet, increasingly, scholars have begun to note that while IC-consistent policies have gained some prominence, they have done so alongside MC policies. This suggests the possibility of complementarity between the two, and prominent scholars on both sides have also begun to stress complementarity. What this might look like, however, has not yet been well researched or developed. Focusing on the UK context, an important site in which debates between MC and IC have played out, this article aims to address this point of complementarity. It does so through an analysis of documents and interviews from civil society organisations who work in areas of integration, diversity and anti-discrimination at national and local levels. The article identifies four models of complementarity and shows the divergent and contested ways in which theoretical aspects of competing normative positions are combined empirically. In this way, it develops an argument for the continued centrality of MC for policy in these areas.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>The Sociological Review</journal><volume>0</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>SAGE Publications</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0038-0261</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1467-954X</issnElectronic><keywords>anti-discrimination; diversity; integration; interculturalism; multiculturalism</keywords><publishedDay>19</publishedDay><publishedMonth>3</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-03-19</publishedDate><doi>10.1177/00380261241238585</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>APC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders>Humanities in the European Research Area (PLURISPACE: Negotiating Diversity in Expanded European Public Spaces (HERA.2.057)</funders><projectreference>PLURISPACE: Negotiating Diversity in Expanded European Public Spaces (HERA.2.057)</projectreference><lastEdited>2024-04-15T16:09:34.0677042</lastEdited><Created>2024-03-28T10:25:05.5421437</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Thomas</firstname><surname>Sealy</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Pier-Luc</firstname><surname>Dupont Picard</surname><orcid>0000-0003-1610-4667</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Tariq</firstname><surname>Modood</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>65927__30021__04c03da0f04a4de38dffcc48dcb554c5.pdf</filename><originalFilename>65927.VOR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2024-04-15T15:44:23.8223804</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>152977</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© The Author(s) 2024. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling v2 65927 2024-03-28 Difference and diversity: Combining multiculturalist and interculturalist approaches to integration a8843d62ec83157f25d4bc7935e1479e 0000-0003-1610-4667 Pier-Luc Dupont Picard Pier-Luc Dupont Picard true false 2024-03-28 APC Multiculturalism (MC) and interculturalism (IC) as approaches to governing ethnic diversity have developed an often antagonistic relationship, borne out through scholarly as well as political debates. Yet, increasingly, scholars have begun to note that while IC-consistent policies have gained some prominence, they have done so alongside MC policies. This suggests the possibility of complementarity between the two, and prominent scholars on both sides have also begun to stress complementarity. What this might look like, however, has not yet been well researched or developed. Focusing on the UK context, an important site in which debates between MC and IC have played out, this article aims to address this point of complementarity. It does so through an analysis of documents and interviews from civil society organisations who work in areas of integration, diversity and anti-discrimination at national and local levels. The article identifies four models of complementarity and shows the divergent and contested ways in which theoretical aspects of competing normative positions are combined empirically. In this way, it develops an argument for the continued centrality of MC for policy in these areas. Journal Article The Sociological Review 0 SAGE Publications 0038-0261 1467-954X anti-discrimination; diversity; integration; interculturalism; multiculturalism 19 3 2024 2024-03-19 10.1177/00380261241238585 COLLEGE NANME Politics, Philosophy and International Relations COLLEGE CODE APC Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee Humanities in the European Research Area (PLURISPACE: Negotiating Diversity in Expanded European Public Spaces (HERA.2.057) PLURISPACE: Negotiating Diversity in Expanded European Public Spaces (HERA.2.057) 2024-04-15T16:09:34.0677042 2024-03-28T10:25:05.5421437 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations Thomas Sealy 1 Pier-Luc Dupont Picard 0000-0003-1610-4667 2 Tariq Modood 3 65927__30021__04c03da0f04a4de38dffcc48dcb554c5.pdf 65927.VOR.pdf 2024-04-15T15:44:23.8223804 Output 152977 application/pdf Version of Record true © The Author(s) 2024. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Difference and diversity: Combining multiculturalist and interculturalist approaches to integration
spellingShingle Difference and diversity: Combining multiculturalist and interculturalist approaches to integration
Pier-Luc Dupont Picard
title_short Difference and diversity: Combining multiculturalist and interculturalist approaches to integration
title_full Difference and diversity: Combining multiculturalist and interculturalist approaches to integration
title_fullStr Difference and diversity: Combining multiculturalist and interculturalist approaches to integration
title_full_unstemmed Difference and diversity: Combining multiculturalist and interculturalist approaches to integration
title_sort Difference and diversity: Combining multiculturalist and interculturalist approaches to integration
author_id_str_mv a8843d62ec83157f25d4bc7935e1479e
author_id_fullname_str_mv a8843d62ec83157f25d4bc7935e1479e_***_Pier-Luc Dupont Picard
author Pier-Luc Dupont Picard
author2 Thomas Sealy
Pier-Luc Dupont Picard
Tariq Modood
format Journal article
container_title The Sociological Review
container_volume 0
publishDate 2024
institution Swansea University
issn 0038-0261
1467-954X
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00380261241238585
publisher SAGE Publications
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Multiculturalism (MC) and interculturalism (IC) as approaches to governing ethnic diversity have developed an often antagonistic relationship, borne out through scholarly as well as political debates. Yet, increasingly, scholars have begun to note that while IC-consistent policies have gained some prominence, they have done so alongside MC policies. This suggests the possibility of complementarity between the two, and prominent scholars on both sides have also begun to stress complementarity. What this might look like, however, has not yet been well researched or developed. Focusing on the UK context, an important site in which debates between MC and IC have played out, this article aims to address this point of complementarity. It does so through an analysis of documents and interviews from civil society organisations who work in areas of integration, diversity and anti-discrimination at national and local levels. The article identifies four models of complementarity and shows the divergent and contested ways in which theoretical aspects of competing normative positions are combined empirically. In this way, it develops an argument for the continued centrality of MC for policy in these areas.
published_date 2024-03-19T16:09:30Z
_version_ 1796413870749777920
score 11.013731