No Cover Image

Journal article 312 views 50 downloads

Secrecy games, power, and resistance in global politics

Elspeth Van Veeren Orcid Logo, Clare Stevens, Amaha Senu Orcid Logo

Review of International Studies, Pages: 1 - 18

Swansea University Author: Amaha Senu Orcid Logo

  • 65868.VoR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © The Author(s), 2024. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence.

    Download (210.79KB)

Abstract

In contrast to a view of secrecy as a tool of statecraft, where the game of ‘covering/uncovering’ dominates as the central way of interpretating secrecy’s power, we set out ‘secrecy games’ as an approach for understanding secrecy’s power and influence. To do so, we offer a set of three games to illu...

Full description

Published in: Review of International Studies
ISSN: 0260-2105 1469-9044
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2024
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa65868
first_indexed 2024-03-19T21:03:30Z
last_indexed 2024-11-28T19:42:38Z
id cronfa65868
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2024-11-28T13:31:21.0201766</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>65868</id><entry>2024-03-19</entry><title>Secrecy games, power, and resistance in global politics</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>addbcb0793eaa6cbb74d96f145275cbb</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8666-8025</ORCID><firstname>Amaha</firstname><surname>Senu</surname><name>Amaha Senu</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-03-19</date><deptcode>SOSS</deptcode><abstract>In contrast to a view of secrecy as a tool of statecraft, where the game of &#x2018;covering/uncovering&#x2019; dominates as the central way of interpretating secrecy&#x2019;s power, we set out &#x2018;secrecy games&#x2019; as an approach for understanding secrecy&#x2019;s power and influence. To do so, we offer a set of three games to illustrate the more varied ways that secrecy operates, and draw attention to the ways in which non-state actors use secrecy and shape its effects. In particular, we offer an analysis of: 1) the secrecy games of tunnelling in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the role of mobility as part of secrecy; 2) the secrecy game of camouflage and how stowaways blend in to facilitate access to global shipping routes; and 3) the secrecy game of maze-running and maze-making within urban warfare. Drawing these together, we show how secrecy involves a wider set of actors, practices, and associated knowledge-(un)making strategies than currently understood within International Relations. In turn, this expanded understanding of secrecy helps to make sense of the more complex ways in which secrecy is presented, used, resisted, and transformed &#x2013; including and especially as a force that limits sovereign power &#x2013; and, therefore, as central to what shapes global politics.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Review of International Studies</journal><volume>0</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>1</paginationStart><paginationEnd>18</paginationEnd><publisher>Cambridge University Press (CUP)</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0260-2105</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1469-9044</issnElectronic><keywords>Politics of knowledge; resistance; secrecy; secrecy games; security</keywords><publishedDay>22</publishedDay><publishedMonth>4</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-04-22</publishedDate><doi>10.1017/s0260210524000275</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Social Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SOSS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-11-28T13:31:21.0201766</lastEdited><Created>2024-03-19T15:07:13.6146836</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Elspeth Van</firstname><surname>Veeren</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2582-9486</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Clare</firstname><surname>Stevens</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Amaha</firstname><surname>Senu</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8666-8025</orcid><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>65868__30174__bbb1161cc83d4f7c86edab6ee6cde768.pdf</filename><originalFilename>65868.VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2024-04-28T20:53:28.1149118</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>215850</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>&#xA9; The Author(s), 2024. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2024-11-28T13:31:21.0201766 v2 65868 2024-03-19 Secrecy games, power, and resistance in global politics addbcb0793eaa6cbb74d96f145275cbb 0000-0001-8666-8025 Amaha Senu Amaha Senu true false 2024-03-19 SOSS In contrast to a view of secrecy as a tool of statecraft, where the game of ‘covering/uncovering’ dominates as the central way of interpretating secrecy’s power, we set out ‘secrecy games’ as an approach for understanding secrecy’s power and influence. To do so, we offer a set of three games to illustrate the more varied ways that secrecy operates, and draw attention to the ways in which non-state actors use secrecy and shape its effects. In particular, we offer an analysis of: 1) the secrecy games of tunnelling in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the role of mobility as part of secrecy; 2) the secrecy game of camouflage and how stowaways blend in to facilitate access to global shipping routes; and 3) the secrecy game of maze-running and maze-making within urban warfare. Drawing these together, we show how secrecy involves a wider set of actors, practices, and associated knowledge-(un)making strategies than currently understood within International Relations. In turn, this expanded understanding of secrecy helps to make sense of the more complex ways in which secrecy is presented, used, resisted, and transformed – including and especially as a force that limits sovereign power – and, therefore, as central to what shapes global politics. Journal Article Review of International Studies 0 1 18 Cambridge University Press (CUP) 0260-2105 1469-9044 Politics of knowledge; resistance; secrecy; secrecy games; security 22 4 2024 2024-04-22 10.1017/s0260210524000275 COLLEGE NANME Social Sciences School COLLEGE CODE SOSS Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee 2024-11-28T13:31:21.0201766 2024-03-19T15:07:13.6146836 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy Elspeth Van Veeren 0000-0002-2582-9486 1 Clare Stevens 2 Amaha Senu 0000-0001-8666-8025 3 65868__30174__bbb1161cc83d4f7c86edab6ee6cde768.pdf 65868.VoR.pdf 2024-04-28T20:53:28.1149118 Output 215850 application/pdf Version of Record true © The Author(s), 2024. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence. true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
title Secrecy games, power, and resistance in global politics
spellingShingle Secrecy games, power, and resistance in global politics
Amaha Senu
title_short Secrecy games, power, and resistance in global politics
title_full Secrecy games, power, and resistance in global politics
title_fullStr Secrecy games, power, and resistance in global politics
title_full_unstemmed Secrecy games, power, and resistance in global politics
title_sort Secrecy games, power, and resistance in global politics
author_id_str_mv addbcb0793eaa6cbb74d96f145275cbb
author_id_fullname_str_mv addbcb0793eaa6cbb74d96f145275cbb_***_Amaha Senu
author Amaha Senu
author2 Elspeth Van Veeren
Clare Stevens
Amaha Senu
format Journal article
container_title Review of International Studies
container_volume 0
container_start_page 1
publishDate 2024
institution Swansea University
issn 0260-2105
1469-9044
doi_str_mv 10.1017/s0260210524000275
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description In contrast to a view of secrecy as a tool of statecraft, where the game of ‘covering/uncovering’ dominates as the central way of interpretating secrecy’s power, we set out ‘secrecy games’ as an approach for understanding secrecy’s power and influence. To do so, we offer a set of three games to illustrate the more varied ways that secrecy operates, and draw attention to the ways in which non-state actors use secrecy and shape its effects. In particular, we offer an analysis of: 1) the secrecy games of tunnelling in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the role of mobility as part of secrecy; 2) the secrecy game of camouflage and how stowaways blend in to facilitate access to global shipping routes; and 3) the secrecy game of maze-running and maze-making within urban warfare. Drawing these together, we show how secrecy involves a wider set of actors, practices, and associated knowledge-(un)making strategies than currently understood within International Relations. In turn, this expanded understanding of secrecy helps to make sense of the more complex ways in which secrecy is presented, used, resisted, and transformed – including and especially as a force that limits sovereign power – and, therefore, as central to what shapes global politics.
published_date 2024-04-22T20:29:15Z
_version_ 1821348153534709760
score 11.04748