Journal article 337 views 52 downloads
Intercomparison of surface velocimetry techniques for drone-based marine current characterization
,
Matthew Lewis,
Simon Neill ,
Benjamin J. Williamson ,
Ian Masters ,
Dominic Reeve
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Volume: 299
Swansea University Authors:
Iain Fairley, Nicholas King, Ian Masters , Dominic Reeve
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2024 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Download (10.45MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.ecss.2024.108682
Abstract
Mapping tidal currents is important for a variety of coastal and marine applications. Deriving current maps from in-situ measurements is difficult due to spatio-temporal separation of measurement points. Therefore, low-cost remote sensing tools such as drone-based surface velocimetry are attractive....
| Published in: | Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0272-7714 |
| Published: |
Elsevier BV
2024
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa65660 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract: |
Mapping tidal currents is important for a variety of coastal and marine applications. Deriving current maps from in-situ measurements is difficult due to spatio-temporal separation of measurement points. Therefore, low-cost remote sensing tools such as drone-based surface velocimetry are attractive. Previous application of particle image velocimetry to tidal current measurements demonstrated that accuracy depends on site and environmental conditions. This study compares surface velocimetry techniques across a range of these conditions. Various open-source tools and image pre-processing methods were applied to six sets of videos and validation data that cover a variety of site and weather conditions. When wind-driven ripples are present in imagery, it was found a short-wave celerity inversion performed best, with mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 5–6% compared to surface drifters. During lower wind speeds, current-advected surface features are visible and techniques which track these work best, of which the most appropriate technique depends on specifics of the collected imagery; MAPEs of 9–21% were obtained. This work has quantified accuracy and demonstrated that surface current maps can be obtained from drones under both high and low wind speeds and at a variety of sites. By following these suggested approaches, practitioners can use drones as a current mapping tool at coastal and offshore sites with confidence in the outputs. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
Drones; Tidal currents; Surface velocimetry; Particle image velocimetry; Particle tracking velocimetry; Optical flow |
| College: |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| Funders: |
The financial support of the Selkie Project is acknowledged. The Selkie Project is funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the Ireland Wales Cooperation programme. The authors would also like to acknowledge the financial support of the EPSRC Supergen ORE Hub (EP/S000747/1) funded V-SCORES project and the support of SEEC (Smart Efficient Energy Centre) at Bangor University, part-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), administered by the Welsh Government. M Lewis also wishes to acknowledge the EPSRC fellowship METRIC: EP/R034664/1. |