Journal article 145 views 5 downloads
The International Olympic Committee framework on fairness, inclusion and nondiscrimination on the basis of gender identity and sex variations does not protect fairness for female athletes
,
Ross Tucker ,
Kerry McGawley ,
Alun Williams,
Grégoire P. Millet ,
Øyvind Sandbakk ,
Glyn Howatson ,
Gregory A. Brown ,
Lara A. Carlson ,
Sarah Chantler ,
Mark A. Chen ,
Shane Heffernan ,
Neil Heron ,
Christopher Kirk ,
Marie H. Murphy ,
Noel Pollock ,
Jamie Pringle,
Andrew Richardson ,
Jordan Santos‐Concejero ,
Georgina K. Stebbings ,
Ask Vest Christiansen ,
Stuart M. Phillips ,
Cathy Devine ,
Carwyn Jones ,
Jon Pike ,
Emma N. Hilton
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, Volume: 34, Issue: 3
Swansea University Authors:
Alun Williams, Shane Heffernan
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2024 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.
Download (3.53MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1111/sms.14581
Abstract
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) recently published a Framework on Fairness, Inclusion, and Non-discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity and Sex Variations. Although we appreciate the IOC's recognition of the role of sports science and medicine in policy development, we disagree...
| Published in: | Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0905-7188 1600-0838 |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa65578 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract: |
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) recently published a Framework on Fairness, Inclusion, and Non-discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity and Sex Variations. Although we appreciate the IOC's recognition of the role of sports science and medicine in policy development, we disagree with the assertion that the IOC Framework is consistent with existing scientific and medical evidence and question its recommendations for implementation.Testosterone exposure during male development results in physical differences between male and female bodies; this process underpins male athletic advantage in muscle mass, strength and power, and endurance and aerobic capacity. The IOC's ”no presumption of advantage” principle disregards this reality. Studies show that transgender women (male-born individuals who identify as women) with suppressed testosterone retain muscle mass, strength, and other physical advantages compared to females; male performance advantage cannot be eliminated with testosterone suppression.The IOC's concept of “meaningful competition” is flawed because fairness of category does not hinge on closely-matched performances. The female category ensures fair competition for female athletes by excluding male advantages. Case-by-case testing for transgender women may lead to stigmatisation and cannot be robustly managed in practice.We argue that eligibility criteria for female competition must consider male development rather than relying on current testosterone levels. Female athletes should be recognized as the key stakeholders in the consultation and decision-making processes. We urge the IOC to re-evaluate the recommendations of their Framework to include a comprehensive understanding of the biological advantages of male development to ensure fairness and safety in female sports. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
Exercise, sport, sports medicine, sports policy, transgender |
| College: |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| Funders: |
No funding was received for this manuscript |
| Issue: |
3 |