Journal article 200 views 54 downloads
Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea
Australian Journal of Public Administration
Swansea University Author:
Jae Kim
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License.
Download (223.75KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1111/1467-8500.12619
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to compare the focus (strategy, capacity, and operation) and locus (internal and external) of innovation types of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-oriented public sector innovation (PSI) in Thailand and Korea and to contribute to the limited understanding of the role of...
Published in: | Australian Journal of Public Administration |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0313-6647 1467-8500 |
Published: |
Wiley
2023
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa65344 |
first_indexed |
2024-03-25T11:23:15Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2024-11-28T13:41:50Z |
id |
cronfa65344 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2024-11-28T11:26:49.2077945</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>65344</id><entry>2023-12-19</entry><title>Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>ec3bd686cb02d42122bb927241d6b451</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-1055-8652</ORCID><firstname>Jae</firstname><surname>Kim</surname><name>Jae Kim</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2023-12-19</date><deptcode>CBAE</deptcode><abstract>The aim of this paper is to compare the focus (strategy, capacity, and operation) and locus (internal and external) of innovation types of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-oriented public sector innovation (PSI) in Thailand and Korea and to contribute to the limited understanding of the role of national context in PSI. Our study analysed 263 SDGs-oriented innovations based on the new typology proposed by Chen et al. The findings identified that the orientation of SDGs-oriented PSI is more external and policy innovation is the most common type in both countries. These distributions, however, vary depending on the contextual differences in administrative and technological contexts, resulting in SDGs-oriented PSI in Korea emphasised on strategy focus, whereas Thailand emphasised capacity focus. This also demonstrates a temporality between strategy, capacity, and operations foci in Korea, but Thailand attempted to fill the capacity gap through SDGs-oriented innovation. Insights from this empirical study can assist public managers in selecting innovation portfolio configurations applicable to their national context.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Australian Journal of Public Administration</journal><volume>0</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Wiley</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0313-6647</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1467-8500</issnElectronic><keywords>comparative study, innovation types, Korea, public sector innova-tion, Thailand</keywords><publishedDay>30</publishedDay><publishedMonth>11</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-11-30</publishedDate><doi>10.1111/1467-8500.12619</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Management School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CBAE</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-11-28T11:26:49.2077945</lastEdited><Created>2023-12-19T12:53:24.8060779</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Management - Business Management</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Chutima</firstname><surname>Suchitwarasan</surname><orcid>0009-0001-6847-2595</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Emre</firstname><surname>Cinar</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Chris</firstname><surname>Simms</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Jae</firstname><surname>Kim</surname><orcid>0000-0002-1055-8652</orcid><order>4</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>65344__29821__60362a25427c4c078819da1af1de9740.pdf</filename><originalFilename>65344.VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2024-03-25T11:23:47.1276633</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>229123</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2024-11-28T11:26:49.2077945 v2 65344 2023-12-19 Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea ec3bd686cb02d42122bb927241d6b451 0000-0002-1055-8652 Jae Kim Jae Kim true false 2023-12-19 CBAE The aim of this paper is to compare the focus (strategy, capacity, and operation) and locus (internal and external) of innovation types of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-oriented public sector innovation (PSI) in Thailand and Korea and to contribute to the limited understanding of the role of national context in PSI. Our study analysed 263 SDGs-oriented innovations based on the new typology proposed by Chen et al. The findings identified that the orientation of SDGs-oriented PSI is more external and policy innovation is the most common type in both countries. These distributions, however, vary depending on the contextual differences in administrative and technological contexts, resulting in SDGs-oriented PSI in Korea emphasised on strategy focus, whereas Thailand emphasised capacity focus. This also demonstrates a temporality between strategy, capacity, and operations foci in Korea, but Thailand attempted to fill the capacity gap through SDGs-oriented innovation. Insights from this empirical study can assist public managers in selecting innovation portfolio configurations applicable to their national context. Journal Article Australian Journal of Public Administration 0 Wiley 0313-6647 1467-8500 comparative study, innovation types, Korea, public sector innova-tion, Thailand 30 11 2023 2023-11-30 10.1111/1467-8500.12619 COLLEGE NANME Management School COLLEGE CODE CBAE Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee 2024-11-28T11:26:49.2077945 2023-12-19T12:53:24.8060779 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Management - Business Management Chutima Suchitwarasan 0009-0001-6847-2595 1 Emre Cinar 2 Chris Simms 3 Jae Kim 0000-0002-1055-8652 4 65344__29821__60362a25427c4c078819da1af1de9740.pdf 65344.VoR.pdf 2024-03-25T11:23:47.1276633 Output 229123 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License. true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
title |
Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea |
spellingShingle |
Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea Jae Kim |
title_short |
Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea |
title_full |
Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea |
title_fullStr |
Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea |
title_full_unstemmed |
Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea |
title_sort |
Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea |
author_id_str_mv |
ec3bd686cb02d42122bb927241d6b451 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
ec3bd686cb02d42122bb927241d6b451_***_Jae Kim |
author |
Jae Kim |
author2 |
Chutima Suchitwarasan Emre Cinar Chris Simms Jae Kim |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Australian Journal of Public Administration |
container_volume |
0 |
publishDate |
2023 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0313-6647 1467-8500 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1111/1467-8500.12619 |
publisher |
Wiley |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Management - Business Management{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Management - Business Management |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
The aim of this paper is to compare the focus (strategy, capacity, and operation) and locus (internal and external) of innovation types of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-oriented public sector innovation (PSI) in Thailand and Korea and to contribute to the limited understanding of the role of national context in PSI. Our study analysed 263 SDGs-oriented innovations based on the new typology proposed by Chen et al. The findings identified that the orientation of SDGs-oriented PSI is more external and policy innovation is the most common type in both countries. These distributions, however, vary depending on the contextual differences in administrative and technological contexts, resulting in SDGs-oriented PSI in Korea emphasised on strategy focus, whereas Thailand emphasised capacity focus. This also demonstrates a temporality between strategy, capacity, and operations foci in Korea, but Thailand attempted to fill the capacity gap through SDGs-oriented innovation. Insights from this empirical study can assist public managers in selecting innovation portfolio configurations applicable to their national context. |
published_date |
2023-11-30T08:17:23Z |
_version_ |
1824382405915443200 |
score |
11.051778 |