No Cover Image

Journal article 85 views 23 downloads

Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea

Chutima Suchitwarasan Orcid Logo, Emre Cinar, Chris Simms, Jae Kim

Australian Journal of Public Administration

Swansea University Author: Jae Kim

  • 65344.VoR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License.

    Download (223.75KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1111/1467-8500.12619

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to compare the focus (strategy, capacity, and operation) and locus (internal and external) of innovation types of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-oriented public sector innovation (PSI) in Thailand and Korea and to contribute to the limited understanding of the role of...

Full description

Published in: Australian Journal of Public Administration
ISSN: 0313-6647 1467-8500
Published: Wiley 2023
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa65344
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2024-03-25T11:23:15Z
last_indexed 2024-03-25T11:23:15Z
id cronfa65344
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>65344</id><entry>2023-12-19</entry><title>Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>ec3bd686cb02d42122bb927241d6b451</sid><firstname>Jae</firstname><surname>Kim</surname><name>Jae Kim</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2023-12-19</date><deptcode>BBU</deptcode><abstract>The aim of this paper is to compare the focus (strategy, capacity, and operation) and locus (internal and external) of innovation types of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-oriented public sector innovation (PSI) in Thailand and Korea and to contribute to the limited understanding of the role of national context in PSI. Our study analysed 263 SDGs-oriented innovations based on the new typology proposed by Chen et al. The findings identified that the orientation of SDGs-oriented PSI is more external and policy innovation is the most common type in both countries. These distributions, however, vary depending on the contextual differences in administrative and technological contexts, resulting in SDGs-oriented PSI in Korea emphasised on strategy focus, whereas Thailand emphasised capacity focus. This also demonstrates a temporality between strategy, capacity, and operations foci in Korea, but Thailand attempted to fill the capacity gap through SDGs-oriented innovation. Insights from this empirical study can assist public managers in selecting innovation portfolio configurations applicable to their national context.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Australian Journal of Public Administration</journal><volume>0</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Wiley</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0313-6647</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1467-8500</issnElectronic><keywords>comparative study, innovation types, Korea, public sector innova-tion, Thailand</keywords><publishedDay>30</publishedDay><publishedMonth>11</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-11-30</publishedDate><doi>10.1111/1467-8500.12619</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Business</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>BBU</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-03-25T11:52:54.3773113</lastEdited><Created>2023-12-19T12:53:24.8060779</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Management - Business Management</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Chutima</firstname><surname>Suchitwarasan</surname><orcid>0009-0001-6847-2595</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Emre</firstname><surname>Cinar</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Chris</firstname><surname>Simms</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Jae</firstname><surname>Kim</surname><order>4</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>65344__29821__60362a25427c4c078819da1af1de9740.pdf</filename><originalFilename>65344.VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2024-03-25T11:23:47.1276633</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>229123</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling v2 65344 2023-12-19 Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea ec3bd686cb02d42122bb927241d6b451 Jae Kim Jae Kim true false 2023-12-19 BBU The aim of this paper is to compare the focus (strategy, capacity, and operation) and locus (internal and external) of innovation types of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-oriented public sector innovation (PSI) in Thailand and Korea and to contribute to the limited understanding of the role of national context in PSI. Our study analysed 263 SDGs-oriented innovations based on the new typology proposed by Chen et al. The findings identified that the orientation of SDGs-oriented PSI is more external and policy innovation is the most common type in both countries. These distributions, however, vary depending on the contextual differences in administrative and technological contexts, resulting in SDGs-oriented PSI in Korea emphasised on strategy focus, whereas Thailand emphasised capacity focus. This also demonstrates a temporality between strategy, capacity, and operations foci in Korea, but Thailand attempted to fill the capacity gap through SDGs-oriented innovation. Insights from this empirical study can assist public managers in selecting innovation portfolio configurations applicable to their national context. Journal Article Australian Journal of Public Administration 0 Wiley 0313-6647 1467-8500 comparative study, innovation types, Korea, public sector innova-tion, Thailand 30 11 2023 2023-11-30 10.1111/1467-8500.12619 COLLEGE NANME Business COLLEGE CODE BBU Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee 2024-03-25T11:52:54.3773113 2023-12-19T12:53:24.8060779 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Management - Business Management Chutima Suchitwarasan 0009-0001-6847-2595 1 Emre Cinar 2 Chris Simms 3 Jae Kim 4 65344__29821__60362a25427c4c078819da1af1de9740.pdf 65344.VoR.pdf 2024-03-25T11:23:47.1276633 Output 229123 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License. true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
title Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea
spellingShingle Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea
Jae Kim
title_short Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea
title_full Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea
title_fullStr Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea
title_full_unstemmed Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea
title_sort Public sector innovation for sustainable development goals: A comparative study of innovation types in Thailand and Korea
author_id_str_mv ec3bd686cb02d42122bb927241d6b451
author_id_fullname_str_mv ec3bd686cb02d42122bb927241d6b451_***_Jae Kim
author Jae Kim
author2 Chutima Suchitwarasan
Emre Cinar
Chris Simms
Jae Kim
format Journal article
container_title Australian Journal of Public Administration
container_volume 0
publishDate 2023
institution Swansea University
issn 0313-6647
1467-8500
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-8500.12619
publisher Wiley
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Management - Business Management{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Management - Business Management
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description The aim of this paper is to compare the focus (strategy, capacity, and operation) and locus (internal and external) of innovation types of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-oriented public sector innovation (PSI) in Thailand and Korea and to contribute to the limited understanding of the role of national context in PSI. Our study analysed 263 SDGs-oriented innovations based on the new typology proposed by Chen et al. The findings identified that the orientation of SDGs-oriented PSI is more external and policy innovation is the most common type in both countries. These distributions, however, vary depending on the contextual differences in administrative and technological contexts, resulting in SDGs-oriented PSI in Korea emphasised on strategy focus, whereas Thailand emphasised capacity focus. This also demonstrates a temporality between strategy, capacity, and operations foci in Korea, but Thailand attempted to fill the capacity gap through SDGs-oriented innovation. Insights from this empirical study can assist public managers in selecting innovation portfolio configurations applicable to their national context.
published_date 2023-11-30T11:52:51Z
_version_ 1794498962373214208
score 11.017776

Similar Items