Journal article 227 views
Human Rights and Substantive Equality in the Adjudication of Ethnic Practices
Nordic Journal of Human Rights, Volume: 34, Issue: 4, Pages: 289 - 313
Swansea University Author:
Pier-Luc Dupont Picard
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1080/18918131.2016.1243881
Abstract
With the development of human rights and anti-discrimination law, courts have increasingly been called upon to protect ethnicity-related practices from general criminal and civil sanctions. These ‘claims of culture’ have so far been addressed with remarkable inconsistency, leading to popular fears o...
| Published in: | Nordic Journal of Human Rights |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1891-8131 1891-814X |
| Published: |
Informa UK Limited
2016
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa64745 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract: |
With the development of human rights and anti-discrimination law, courts have increasingly been called upon to protect ethnicity-related practices from general criminal and civil sanctions. These ‘claims of culture’ have so far been addressed with remarkable inconsistency, leading to popular fears of unlimited normative pluralism and targeted legislative measures. Compounding such controversies, philosophical approaches to multiculturalism have mostly been concerned with policy and offered vague or distorted portrayals of judicial challenges. This article seeks to fill the gap by exploring how the legal standard of substantive equality might structure the courts' approach to a range of cases involving minority litigants. In particular, I will argue that ethnic practices can be usefully divided into four categories triggering distinct modes of legal reasoning: criminal offences, human rights violations, civil infractions, and symbolic identification. In the first case, cultural differences mainly bear on the analysis of subjective blameworthiness, whereas in the second, they bring out an ongoing shift in the public/private and negative/positive nature of human rights obligations. Civil infractions call for the application of anti-discrimination standards developed in the doctrine of indirect discrimination and reasonable accommodation. As for symbolic identification, it raises the issue of national identities and legal instruments to make them inclusive of the whole citizenry. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
Multiculturalism, Anti-discrimination, Human Rights, Ethnicity, Legal Philosophy |
| College: |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| Funders: |
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education under Grant FPU-12/00482 and by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under Grants DER2012-31771 and DER2015-65840-R (MULTIHURI project, www.multihuri.com). |
| Issue: |
4 |
| Start Page: |
289 |
| End Page: |
313 |