No Cover Image

Book chapter 606 views

Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research

Cornelia Tschichold Orcid Logo, Alex Boulton, Pascual Pérez-Paredes

Developing Feedback Literacy for Academic Journal Peer Review: Narratives from Researchers in Education and Applied Linguistics

Swansea University Author: Cornelia Tschichold Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

DOI (Published version): 10.4324/9781003365662-5

Abstract

Peer review has been the subject of a number of academic publications, typically focusing on the reviewer’s perspective with the aim of promoting more helpful evaluations. By contrast, the present chapter takes an alternative view in defining the feedback literacy of authors who submit a manuscript...

Full description

Published in: Developing Feedback Literacy for Academic Journal Peer Review: Narratives from Researchers in Education and Applied Linguistics
ISBN: 9781032430911 9781003365662
Published: London Routledge 2024
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa64454
first_indexed 2023-09-07T11:31:02Z
last_indexed 2025-05-24T10:31:41Z
id cronfa64454
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2025-05-23T14:13:57.0579351</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>64454</id><entry>2023-09-07</entry><title>Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7ab58ba7c36c98911ed94a11fc7e5cb2</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8487-2209</ORCID><firstname>Cornelia</firstname><surname>Tschichold</surname><name>Cornelia Tschichold</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2023-09-07</date><deptcode>CACS</deptcode><abstract>Peer review has been the subject of a number of academic publications, typically focusing on the reviewer&#x2019;s perspective with the aim of promoting more helpful evaluations. By contrast, the present chapter takes an alternative view in defining the feedback literacy of authors who submit a manuscript to a journal. Basing the study on our involvement in a top-level journal in applied linguistics, we examine the submissions and the procedures, noting common problems along the way. We then draw on a 500,000-word corpus of reviews to select exemplars, adopting a case-study approach first of unsuccessful and then of successful submissions for more detailed examination. These exemplify both the cyclical process of reviewing and revising a manuscript and the conversations that take place between authors and reviewers. The aim of this chapter is twofold: to provide advice for all stages of the reviewing process and to contribute to the growing literature on feedback literacy by promoting reflective practices of those stakeholders involved in the process of submission and publication.</abstract><type>Book chapter</type><journal>Developing Feedback Literacy for Academic Journal Peer Review: Narratives from Researchers in Education and Applied Linguistics</journal><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Routledge</publisher><placeOfPublication>London</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint>9781032430911</isbnPrint><isbnElectronic>9781003365662</isbnElectronic><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>feedback literacy, publishing process, peer review, applied linguistics, CALL</keywords><publishedDay>22</publishedDay><publishedMonth>11</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-11-22</publishedDate><doi>10.4324/9781003365662-5</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Culture and Communications School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CACS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Not Required</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-05-23T14:13:57.0579351</lastEdited><Created>2023-09-07T12:19:06.9669818</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Cornelia</firstname><surname>Tschichold</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8487-2209</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Alex</firstname><surname>Boulton</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Pascual</firstname><surname>P&#xE9;rez-Paredes</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2025-05-23T14:13:57.0579351 v2 64454 2023-09-07 Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research 7ab58ba7c36c98911ed94a11fc7e5cb2 0000-0001-8487-2209 Cornelia Tschichold Cornelia Tschichold true false 2023-09-07 CACS Peer review has been the subject of a number of academic publications, typically focusing on the reviewer’s perspective with the aim of promoting more helpful evaluations. By contrast, the present chapter takes an alternative view in defining the feedback literacy of authors who submit a manuscript to a journal. Basing the study on our involvement in a top-level journal in applied linguistics, we examine the submissions and the procedures, noting common problems along the way. We then draw on a 500,000-word corpus of reviews to select exemplars, adopting a case-study approach first of unsuccessful and then of successful submissions for more detailed examination. These exemplify both the cyclical process of reviewing and revising a manuscript and the conversations that take place between authors and reviewers. The aim of this chapter is twofold: to provide advice for all stages of the reviewing process and to contribute to the growing literature on feedback literacy by promoting reflective practices of those stakeholders involved in the process of submission and publication. Book chapter Developing Feedback Literacy for Academic Journal Peer Review: Narratives from Researchers in Education and Applied Linguistics Routledge London 9781032430911 9781003365662 feedback literacy, publishing process, peer review, applied linguistics, CALL 22 11 2024 2024-11-22 10.4324/9781003365662-5 COLLEGE NANME Culture and Communications School COLLEGE CODE CACS Swansea University Not Required 2025-05-23T14:13:57.0579351 2023-09-07T12:19:06.9669818 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics Cornelia Tschichold 0000-0001-8487-2209 1 Alex Boulton 2 Pascual Pérez-Paredes 3
title Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
spellingShingle Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
Cornelia Tschichold
title_short Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
title_full Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
title_fullStr Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
title_sort Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
author_id_str_mv 7ab58ba7c36c98911ed94a11fc7e5cb2
author_id_fullname_str_mv 7ab58ba7c36c98911ed94a11fc7e5cb2_***_Cornelia Tschichold
author Cornelia Tschichold
author2 Cornelia Tschichold
Alex Boulton
Pascual Pérez-Paredes
format Book chapter
container_title Developing Feedback Literacy for Academic Journal Peer Review: Narratives from Researchers in Education and Applied Linguistics
publishDate 2024
institution Swansea University
isbn 9781032430911
9781003365662
doi_str_mv 10.4324/9781003365662-5
publisher Routledge
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Peer review has been the subject of a number of academic publications, typically focusing on the reviewer’s perspective with the aim of promoting more helpful evaluations. By contrast, the present chapter takes an alternative view in defining the feedback literacy of authors who submit a manuscript to a journal. Basing the study on our involvement in a top-level journal in applied linguistics, we examine the submissions and the procedures, noting common problems along the way. We then draw on a 500,000-word corpus of reviews to select exemplars, adopting a case-study approach first of unsuccessful and then of successful submissions for more detailed examination. These exemplify both the cyclical process of reviewing and revising a manuscript and the conversations that take place between authors and reviewers. The aim of this chapter is twofold: to provide advice for all stages of the reviewing process and to contribute to the growing literature on feedback literacy by promoting reflective practices of those stakeholders involved in the process of submission and publication.
published_date 2024-11-22T05:25:43Z
_version_ 1836507824368123904
score 11.380731