No Cover Image

Journal article 485 views 70 downloads

Circulating white blood cell traits and colorectal cancer risk: A Mendelian randomisation study

Andrei‐Emil Constantinescu Orcid Logo, Caroline J. Bull Orcid Logo, Nick Jones Orcid Logo, Ruth Mitchell, Kimberley Burrows, Niki Dimou, Stéphane Bézieau, Hermann Brenner, Daniel D. Buchanan Orcid Logo, Mauro D'Amato, Mark A. Jenkins, Victor Moreno Orcid Logo, Rish K. Pai, Caroline Y. Um, Emily White, Neil Murphy Orcid Logo, Marc Gunter, Nicholas J. Timpson, Jeroen R. Huyghe, Emma E. Vincent

International Journal of Cancer, Volume: 154, Issue: 1, Pages: 94 - 103

Swansea University Author: Nick Jones Orcid Logo

  • 64314.VOR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC. Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0).

    Download (1.21MB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1002/ijc.34691

Abstract

Observational studies have suggested a protective role for eosinophils in colorectal cancer (CRC) development and implicated neutrophils, but the causal relationships remain unclear. Here, we aimed to estimate the causal effect of circulating white blood cell (WBC) counts (N = ~550 000) for basophil...

Full description

Published in: International Journal of Cancer
ISSN: 0020-7136 1097-0215
Published: Wiley 2024
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa64314
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: Observational studies have suggested a protective role for eosinophils in colorectal cancer (CRC) development and implicated neutrophils, but the causal relationships remain unclear. Here, we aimed to estimate the causal effect of circulating white blood cell (WBC) counts (N = ~550 000) for basophils, eosinophils, monocytes, lymphocytes and neutrophils on CRC risk (N = 52 775 cases and 45 940 controls) using Mendelian randomisation (MR). For comparison, we also examined this relationship using individual-level data from UK Biobank (4043 incident CRC cases and 332 773 controls) in a longitudinal cohort analysis. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) MR analysis suggested a protective effect of increased basophil count and eosinophil count on CRC risk [OR per 1-SD increase: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.99, P = .04; OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88-0.98, P = .01]. The protective effect of eosinophils remained [OR per 1-SD increase: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.97, P = .01] following adjustments for all other WBC subtypes, to account for genetic correlation between the traits, using multivariable MR. A protective effect of increased lymphocyte count on CRC risk was also found [OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.76-0.93, P = 6.70e-4] following adjustment. Consistent with MR results, a protective effect for eosinophils in the cohort analysis in the fully adjusted model [RR per 1-SD increase: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99, P = .02] and following adjustment for the other WBC subtypes [RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99, P = .001] was observed. Our study implicates peripheral blood immune cells, in particular eosinophils and lymphocytes, in CRC development, highlighting a need for mechanistic studies to interrogate these relationships.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer, eosinophils, Mendelian randomisation, UK biobank, White blood cell count
College: Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
Funders: Cancer Research UK (Grant Number: C18281/A29019), Diabetes UK (Grant Number: 17/0005587), Medical Research Council (Grant Numbers: MC_UU_00011/1, MC_UU_00011/4, MR/N0137941/1), National Cancer Institute (Grant Number: R21CA230486), NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Grant Number: BRC-1215-2001), Wellcome Trust (Grant Numbers: 202802/Z/16/Z, 204813/Z/16/Z, 217065/Z/19/Z), World Cancer Research Fund International (Grant Number: IIG_2019_2009).
Issue: 1
Start Page: 94
End Page: 103