No Cover Image

Journal article 344 views

Neurocognitive functioning in comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea patients is better after positive airway pressure therapy, but worse after cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: exploratory analysis of cognitive outcomes from...

Arlener D Turner, Jason C Ong, Alex Jones Orcid Logo, Alice Tu, Matthew Salanitro, Megan R Crawford

SLEEP, Volume: 46, Issue: 8

Swansea University Author: Alex Jones Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1093/sleep/zsad128

Abstract

Study Objectives: Neurocognitive impairments in comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA) are not well documented. We explored neurocognitive functioning and treatment effects in individuals with COMISA as an ancillary study to a randomized clinical trial. Methods: Participants with COMISA (n = 45;...

Full description

Published in: SLEEP
ISSN: 0161-8105 1550-9109
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2023
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa63885
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: Study Objectives: Neurocognitive impairments in comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA) are not well documented. We explored neurocognitive functioning and treatment effects in individuals with COMISA as an ancillary study to a randomized clinical trial. Methods: Participants with COMISA (n = 45; 51.1% female; mean age = 52.07 ± 13.29 years), from a 3-arm randomized clinical trial combining cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and positive airway pressure (PAP) concurrently (CBT-I+PAP) or sequentially, completed neurocognitive testing at baseline, and post-treatment. Using Bayesian linear mixed models, we estimated effects of CBT-I, PAP, or CBT-I+PAP, compared to baseline, and CBT-I+PAP compared to PAP on 12 metrics across five cognitive domains. Results: This COMISA sample had worse neurocognitive performance at baseline than reported for insomnia, sleep apnea, and controls in the literature, though short-term memory and psychomotor speed performance appears intact. When comparing PAP to baseline, performance on all measures was better after treatment. Performance after CBT-I was worse compared to baseline, and only performance in attention/vigilance, executive functioning via Stroop interference and verbal memory was better with moderate–high effect sizes and moderate probability of superiority (61–83). Comparisons of CBT-I+PAP to baseline generated results similar to PAP and comparing CBT-I+PAP to PAP revealed superior performance in only attention/vigilance via psychomotor vigilance task lapses and verbal memory for PAP. Conclusions: Treatment combinations involving CBT-I were associated with poorer neurocognitive performance. These potentially temporary effects may stem from sleep restriction, a component of CBT-I often accompanied by initially reduced total sleep time. Future studies should examine long-term effects of individual and combined COMISA treatment pathways to inform treatment recommendations. Clinical trial: This was an ancillary study from a clinical trial (Multidisciplinary Approach to the Treatment of Insomnia and Comorbid Sleep Apnea (MATRICS), which was preregistered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01785303)).
Keywords: COMISA, insomnia, sleep apnea, CBT-I, PAP, neurocognitive functioning
College: Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
Funders: This research was supported by a National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NIH) Research Grant (R01HL114529) awarded to JCO and Supplements to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research (R01HL114529-03S1) awarded to ADT.
Issue: 8