No Cover Image

Journal article 493 views 39 downloads

The Dearth of the Author: Philip Massinger and the Beaumont and Fletcher Folio

Eoin Price Orcid Logo

The Review of English Studies, Volume: 74, Issue: 313, Pages: 78 - 94

Swansea University Author: Eoin Price Orcid Logo

  • 62376.VOR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © The Author(s) 2022. Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0).

    Download (272.54KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1093/res/hgac079

Abstract

In 1647, Humphrey Moseley and Humphrey Robinson published a folio collection of unpublished works which they attributed to Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher, two writers famous for their collaborations from 1606 to 1613. But in affording Beaumont a place on the title page, the publishers misattribu...

Full description

Published in: The Review of English Studies
ISSN: 0034-6551 1471-6968
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2023
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa62376
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2023-01-19T10:47:59Z
last_indexed 2023-02-17T04:16:32Z
id cronfa62376
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>62376</id><entry>2023-01-19</entry><title>The Dearth of the Author: Philip Massinger and the Beaumont and Fletcher Folio</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>5eede959b07e4a7b96cab66816cd8a8f</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-9546-9183</ORCID><firstname>Eoin</firstname><surname>Price</surname><name>Eoin Price</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2023-01-19</date><deptcode>AELC</deptcode><abstract>In 1647, Humphrey Moseley and Humphrey Robinson published a folio collection of unpublished works which they attributed to Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher, two writers famous for their collaborations from 1606 to 1613. But in affording Beaumont a place on the title page, the publishers misattributed the volume. Scholars now accept that Beaumont had very little direct input in the collection whereas Philip Massinger, who began collaborating with Fletcher soon after Beaumont’s retirement, had a very significant, unacknowledged role in the collected plays. This essay offers the first extended discussion of why it was that Massinger was written out of this canon-defining volume. I argue first that Massinger was by many accounts a popular and vendible dramatist, whose omission from the folio had little to do with him having a poor reputation. Instead, I suggest that the reputation of the names Beaumont and Fletcher, established in the preceding decades, proved irresistible to the publishers. Furthermore, I argue that Massinger’s reputation as a distinctive solo playwright also counted against him, making it harder to apprehend him as a prolific collaborator. Next, I demonstrate how the 1647 folio participated in a process of canonization which elided Massinger’s significant collaborative contribution and discuss the distorting effect this has had on our understanding of Beaumont, Fletcher, Massinger, and playwrighting practice more broadly. I end by pointing towards some ways of rectifying the historical elision of Massinger’s collaboration with Fletcher.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>The Review of English Studies</journal><volume>74</volume><journalNumber>313</journalNumber><paginationStart>78</paginationStart><paginationEnd>94</paginationEnd><publisher>Oxford University Press (OUP)</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0034-6551</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1471-6968</issnElectronic><keywords>Philip Massinger, Beaumont and Fletcher Folio, English studies</keywords><publishedDay>23</publishedDay><publishedMonth>2</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-02-23</publishedDate><doi>10.1093/res/hgac079</doi><url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/res/hgac079</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>English Literature</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>AELC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal)</apcterm><funders>Swansea University.</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2023-06-27T16:42:27.6187047</lastEdited><Created>2023-01-19T10:45:43.7992652</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Eoin</firstname><surname>Price</surname><orcid>0000-0001-9546-9183</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>62376__27896__ae09da570340400a880967aa5d450ecd.pdf</filename><originalFilename>62376.VOR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2023-06-20T15:48:12.3319912</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>279085</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© The Author(s) 2022. Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling v2 62376 2023-01-19 The Dearth of the Author: Philip Massinger and the Beaumont and Fletcher Folio 5eede959b07e4a7b96cab66816cd8a8f 0000-0001-9546-9183 Eoin Price Eoin Price true false 2023-01-19 AELC In 1647, Humphrey Moseley and Humphrey Robinson published a folio collection of unpublished works which they attributed to Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher, two writers famous for their collaborations from 1606 to 1613. But in affording Beaumont a place on the title page, the publishers misattributed the volume. Scholars now accept that Beaumont had very little direct input in the collection whereas Philip Massinger, who began collaborating with Fletcher soon after Beaumont’s retirement, had a very significant, unacknowledged role in the collected plays. This essay offers the first extended discussion of why it was that Massinger was written out of this canon-defining volume. I argue first that Massinger was by many accounts a popular and vendible dramatist, whose omission from the folio had little to do with him having a poor reputation. Instead, I suggest that the reputation of the names Beaumont and Fletcher, established in the preceding decades, proved irresistible to the publishers. Furthermore, I argue that Massinger’s reputation as a distinctive solo playwright also counted against him, making it harder to apprehend him as a prolific collaborator. Next, I demonstrate how the 1647 folio participated in a process of canonization which elided Massinger’s significant collaborative contribution and discuss the distorting effect this has had on our understanding of Beaumont, Fletcher, Massinger, and playwrighting practice more broadly. I end by pointing towards some ways of rectifying the historical elision of Massinger’s collaboration with Fletcher. Journal Article The Review of English Studies 74 313 78 94 Oxford University Press (OUP) 0034-6551 1471-6968 Philip Massinger, Beaumont and Fletcher Folio, English studies 23 2 2023 2023-02-23 10.1093/res/hgac079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/res/hgac079 COLLEGE NANME English Literature COLLEGE CODE AELC Swansea University SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal) Swansea University. 2023-06-27T16:42:27.6187047 2023-01-19T10:45:43.7992652 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing Eoin Price 0000-0001-9546-9183 1 62376__27896__ae09da570340400a880967aa5d450ecd.pdf 62376.VOR.pdf 2023-06-20T15:48:12.3319912 Output 279085 application/pdf Version of Record true © The Author(s) 2022. Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0). true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title The Dearth of the Author: Philip Massinger and the Beaumont and Fletcher Folio
spellingShingle The Dearth of the Author: Philip Massinger and the Beaumont and Fletcher Folio
Eoin Price
title_short The Dearth of the Author: Philip Massinger and the Beaumont and Fletcher Folio
title_full The Dearth of the Author: Philip Massinger and the Beaumont and Fletcher Folio
title_fullStr The Dearth of the Author: Philip Massinger and the Beaumont and Fletcher Folio
title_full_unstemmed The Dearth of the Author: Philip Massinger and the Beaumont and Fletcher Folio
title_sort The Dearth of the Author: Philip Massinger and the Beaumont and Fletcher Folio
author_id_str_mv 5eede959b07e4a7b96cab66816cd8a8f
author_id_fullname_str_mv 5eede959b07e4a7b96cab66816cd8a8f_***_Eoin Price
author Eoin Price
author2 Eoin Price
format Journal article
container_title The Review of English Studies
container_volume 74
container_issue 313
container_start_page 78
publishDate 2023
institution Swansea University
issn 0034-6551
1471-6968
doi_str_mv 10.1093/res/hgac079
publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/res/hgac079
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description In 1647, Humphrey Moseley and Humphrey Robinson published a folio collection of unpublished works which they attributed to Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher, two writers famous for their collaborations from 1606 to 1613. But in affording Beaumont a place on the title page, the publishers misattributed the volume. Scholars now accept that Beaumont had very little direct input in the collection whereas Philip Massinger, who began collaborating with Fletcher soon after Beaumont’s retirement, had a very significant, unacknowledged role in the collected plays. This essay offers the first extended discussion of why it was that Massinger was written out of this canon-defining volume. I argue first that Massinger was by many accounts a popular and vendible dramatist, whose omission from the folio had little to do with him having a poor reputation. Instead, I suggest that the reputation of the names Beaumont and Fletcher, established in the preceding decades, proved irresistible to the publishers. Furthermore, I argue that Massinger’s reputation as a distinctive solo playwright also counted against him, making it harder to apprehend him as a prolific collaborator. Next, I demonstrate how the 1647 folio participated in a process of canonization which elided Massinger’s significant collaborative contribution and discuss the distorting effect this has had on our understanding of Beaumont, Fletcher, Massinger, and playwrighting practice more broadly. I end by pointing towards some ways of rectifying the historical elision of Massinger’s collaboration with Fletcher.
published_date 2023-02-23T16:42:22Z
_version_ 1769871028084801536
score 11.013148