Journal article 818 views 49 downloads
Complex field verification using a large area CMOS MAPS upstream in radiotherapy
Journal of Instrumentation, Volume: 17, Issue: 08, Start page: C08018
Swansea University Author: Richard Hugtenburg
-
PDF | Version of Record
Released under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence
Download (756.29KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1088/1748-0221/17/08/c08018
Abstract
A multileaf collimator (MLC) is an integral component in modern radiotherapy machines as it dynamically shapes the photon field used for patient treatment. Currently, the MLC leaves which collimate the treatment field are mechanically calibrated to ±1 mm every 3 months and during pre-treatment calib...
Published in: | Journal of Instrumentation |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1748-0221 |
Published: |
IOP Publishing
2022
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa62050 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2022-12-12T13:47:08Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2023-01-13T19:23:14Z |
id |
cronfa62050 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-12-12T13:48:54.5272075</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>62050</id><entry>2022-11-25</entry><title>Complex field verification using a large area CMOS MAPS upstream in radiotherapy</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>efd2f52ea19cb047e01a01e6fa6fa54c</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-0352-9607</ORCID><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Hugtenburg</surname><name>Richard Hugtenburg</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-11-25</date><deptcode>MEDP</deptcode><abstract>A multileaf collimator (MLC) is an integral component in modern radiotherapy machines as it dynamically shapes the photon field used for patient treatment. Currently, the MLC leaves which collimate the treatment field are mechanically calibrated to ±1 mm every 3 months and during pre-treatment calibration are calibrated to the mechanically set leaf positions. Leaf drift can occur between calibration dates and hence exceed the ±1 mm tolerance. Pre-treatment verification, increases LINAC usage time so is seldom performed for each individual patient treatment, but instead for an acceptable sample of patients and/or treatment fractions. Independent real-time treatment verification is therefore desirable. We are developing a large area CMOS MAPS upstream of the patient to monitor MLC leaf positions for real-time treatment verification. CMOS MAPS are radiation hard for photon and electron irradiation, have high readout speeds and low attenuation which makes them an ideal upstream radiation detector for radiotherapy. Previously, we reported on leaf position reconstruction for single leaves using the Lassena, a 12 × 14 cm2, three side buttable MAPS suitable for clinical deployment. Sobel operator based methods were used for edge reconstruction. It was shown that the correspondence between reconstructed and set leaf position was excellent and resolutions ranged between 60.6 ± 8 and 109 ± 12 μm for a single central leaf with leaf extensions ranging from 1 to 35 mm using 0.3 sec of treatment beam time at 400 MU/min. Here, we report on leaf edge reconstruction using updated methods for complex leaf configurations, as occur in clinical use. Results show that leaf positions can be reconstructed with resolutions of 62 ± 6 μm for single leaves and 86 ± 16 μm for adjacent leaves at the isocenter using 0.15 sec at 400 MU/min of treatment beam. These resolutions are significantly better than current calibration standards.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Instrumentation</journal><volume>17</volume><journalNumber>08</journalNumber><paginationStart>C08018</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>IOP Publishing</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>1748-0221</issnElectronic><keywords>Radiotherapy concepts; Solid state detectors; X-ray detectors; Image reconstruction in medical imaging</keywords><publishedDay>23</publishedDay><publishedMonth>8</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2022</publishedYear><publishedDate>2022-08-23</publishedDate><doi>10.1088/1748-0221/17/08/c08018</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Medical Physics</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>MEDP</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-12-12T13:48:54.5272075</lastEdited><Created>2022-11-25T17:16:43.4576107</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">Swansea University Medical School - Medicine</level></path><authors><author><firstname>J.L.</firstname><surname>Pritchard</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>J.J.</firstname><surname>Velthuis</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>L.</firstname><surname>Beck</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Y.</firstname><surname>Li</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>C. De</firstname><surname>Sio</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>L.</firstname><surname>Ballisat</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>J.</firstname><surname>Duan</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Y.</firstname><surname>Shi</surname><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Hugtenburg</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0352-9607</orcid><order>9</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>62050__26065__b26748c0581f4910b1ff78ac2f8a8c14.pdf</filename><originalFilename>62050.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-12-12T13:47:34.1579116</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>774437</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>Released under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2022-12-12T13:48:54.5272075 v2 62050 2022-11-25 Complex field verification using a large area CMOS MAPS upstream in radiotherapy efd2f52ea19cb047e01a01e6fa6fa54c 0000-0003-0352-9607 Richard Hugtenburg Richard Hugtenburg true false 2022-11-25 MEDP A multileaf collimator (MLC) is an integral component in modern radiotherapy machines as it dynamically shapes the photon field used for patient treatment. Currently, the MLC leaves which collimate the treatment field are mechanically calibrated to ±1 mm every 3 months and during pre-treatment calibration are calibrated to the mechanically set leaf positions. Leaf drift can occur between calibration dates and hence exceed the ±1 mm tolerance. Pre-treatment verification, increases LINAC usage time so is seldom performed for each individual patient treatment, but instead for an acceptable sample of patients and/or treatment fractions. Independent real-time treatment verification is therefore desirable. We are developing a large area CMOS MAPS upstream of the patient to monitor MLC leaf positions for real-time treatment verification. CMOS MAPS are radiation hard for photon and electron irradiation, have high readout speeds and low attenuation which makes them an ideal upstream radiation detector for radiotherapy. Previously, we reported on leaf position reconstruction for single leaves using the Lassena, a 12 × 14 cm2, three side buttable MAPS suitable for clinical deployment. Sobel operator based methods were used for edge reconstruction. It was shown that the correspondence between reconstructed and set leaf position was excellent and resolutions ranged between 60.6 ± 8 and 109 ± 12 μm for a single central leaf with leaf extensions ranging from 1 to 35 mm using 0.3 sec of treatment beam time at 400 MU/min. Here, we report on leaf edge reconstruction using updated methods for complex leaf configurations, as occur in clinical use. Results show that leaf positions can be reconstructed with resolutions of 62 ± 6 μm for single leaves and 86 ± 16 μm for adjacent leaves at the isocenter using 0.15 sec at 400 MU/min of treatment beam. These resolutions are significantly better than current calibration standards. Journal Article Journal of Instrumentation 17 08 C08018 IOP Publishing 1748-0221 Radiotherapy concepts; Solid state detectors; X-ray detectors; Image reconstruction in medical imaging 23 8 2022 2022-08-23 10.1088/1748-0221/17/08/c08018 COLLEGE NANME Medical Physics COLLEGE CODE MEDP Swansea University 2022-12-12T13:48:54.5272075 2022-11-25T17:16:43.4576107 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Swansea University Medical School - Medicine J.L. Pritchard 1 J.J. Velthuis 2 L. Beck 3 Y. Li 4 C. De Sio 5 L. Ballisat 6 J. Duan 7 Y. Shi 8 Richard Hugtenburg 0000-0003-0352-9607 9 62050__26065__b26748c0581f4910b1ff78ac2f8a8c14.pdf 62050.pdf 2022-12-12T13:47:34.1579116 Output 774437 application/pdf Version of Record true Released under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
Complex field verification using a large area CMOS MAPS upstream in radiotherapy |
spellingShingle |
Complex field verification using a large area CMOS MAPS upstream in radiotherapy Richard Hugtenburg |
title_short |
Complex field verification using a large area CMOS MAPS upstream in radiotherapy |
title_full |
Complex field verification using a large area CMOS MAPS upstream in radiotherapy |
title_fullStr |
Complex field verification using a large area CMOS MAPS upstream in radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Complex field verification using a large area CMOS MAPS upstream in radiotherapy |
title_sort |
Complex field verification using a large area CMOS MAPS upstream in radiotherapy |
author_id_str_mv |
efd2f52ea19cb047e01a01e6fa6fa54c |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
efd2f52ea19cb047e01a01e6fa6fa54c_***_Richard Hugtenburg |
author |
Richard Hugtenburg |
author2 |
J.L. Pritchard J.J. Velthuis L. Beck Y. Li C. De Sio L. Ballisat J. Duan Y. Shi Richard Hugtenburg |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Journal of Instrumentation |
container_volume |
17 |
container_issue |
08 |
container_start_page |
C08018 |
publishDate |
2022 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
1748-0221 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1088/1748-0221/17/08/c08018 |
publisher |
IOP Publishing |
college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
department_str |
Swansea University Medical School - Medicine{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Swansea University Medical School - Medicine |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
A multileaf collimator (MLC) is an integral component in modern radiotherapy machines as it dynamically shapes the photon field used for patient treatment. Currently, the MLC leaves which collimate the treatment field are mechanically calibrated to ±1 mm every 3 months and during pre-treatment calibration are calibrated to the mechanically set leaf positions. Leaf drift can occur between calibration dates and hence exceed the ±1 mm tolerance. Pre-treatment verification, increases LINAC usage time so is seldom performed for each individual patient treatment, but instead for an acceptable sample of patients and/or treatment fractions. Independent real-time treatment verification is therefore desirable. We are developing a large area CMOS MAPS upstream of the patient to monitor MLC leaf positions for real-time treatment verification. CMOS MAPS are radiation hard for photon and electron irradiation, have high readout speeds and low attenuation which makes them an ideal upstream radiation detector for radiotherapy. Previously, we reported on leaf position reconstruction for single leaves using the Lassena, a 12 × 14 cm2, three side buttable MAPS suitable for clinical deployment. Sobel operator based methods were used for edge reconstruction. It was shown that the correspondence between reconstructed and set leaf position was excellent and resolutions ranged between 60.6 ± 8 and 109 ± 12 μm for a single central leaf with leaf extensions ranging from 1 to 35 mm using 0.3 sec of treatment beam time at 400 MU/min. Here, we report on leaf edge reconstruction using updated methods for complex leaf configurations, as occur in clinical use. Results show that leaf positions can be reconstructed with resolutions of 62 ± 6 μm for single leaves and 86 ± 16 μm for adjacent leaves at the isocenter using 0.15 sec at 400 MU/min of treatment beam. These resolutions are significantly better than current calibration standards. |
published_date |
2022-08-23T04:21:21Z |
_version_ |
1763754410749460480 |
score |
11.037122 |