Journal article 529 views 22 downloads
The effect of foot position during static calibration trials on knee kinematic and kinetics during walking
Gait and Posture, Volume: 99, Pages: 133 - 138
Swansea University Author: Chelsea Starbuck
-
PDF | Accepted Manuscript
©2022 All rights reserved. All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (CC-BY-NC-ND)
Download (414.46KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.11.007
Abstract
BackgroundGait analysis has been used extensively for computing knee kinematics and kinetics, in particular, in healthy and impaired individuals. One variable assessed is the external knee adduction moment (EKAM). Variations in EKAM values between investigations may be caused by changes in static st...
Published in: | Gait and Posture |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0966-6362 |
Published: |
Elsevier BV
2023
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa61950 |
first_indexed |
2022-11-18T10:50:21Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2024-11-14T12:20:03Z |
id |
cronfa61950 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2024-07-17T15:53:29.3333094</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>61950</id><entry>2022-11-18</entry><title>The effect of foot position during static calibration trials on knee kinematic and kinetics during walking</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>b12b936789e5be3976b2f2c1c8988d4c</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6266-2876</ORCID><firstname>Chelsea</firstname><surname>Starbuck</surname><name>Chelsea Starbuck</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-11-18</date><deptcode>EAAS</deptcode><abstract>BackgroundGait analysis has been used extensively for computing knee kinematics and kinetics, in particular, in healthy and impaired individuals. One variable assessed is the external knee adduction moment (EKAM). Variations in EKAM values between investigations may be caused by changes in static standing position, especially foot placement angles which may increase or reduce any differences seen.Purpose of the studyThe current study aimed to explore the influence of static trial foot position on knee kinematic and kinetic variables during walking.MethodsTwelve healthy male participants completed three different static standing trials; 1) 20-degrees toe-in, 2) 0 degree and 3) 20-degrees toe-out before walking at their own pace during a lower limb kinematics and kinetics assessment. First and second peak EKAM was compared between static foot position trials, as well other knee kinematic and kinetic outcomes. Repeated measures ANOVA was used with post hoc pairwise comparison to determine the differences between static foot position trials.ResultsThe first peak of EKAM was significantly smaller in the 20o toe-out angle, than the 20o toe-in angle (p = 0.04 - 8.16% reduction). Furthermore, significant changes were found in peak knee kinematics and kinetics variables (adduction angle, external rotation angle, knee flexion moment external rotation moment, abduction angle and internal rotation angle) in the different positions.ConclusionModification in static foot position between study visits may result in changes especially in the 1st peak EKAM and other kinematics and kinetics variables during walking. Therefore, standardisation of static foot position should be utilised in longitudinal studies to ensure changes in EKAM are not masked or accentuated between assessments.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Gait and Posture</journal><volume>99</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>133</paginationStart><paginationEnd>138</paginationEnd><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0966-6362</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>Static standing position, 3D gait analysis, kinematics, kinetics, knee adduction moment</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-01-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.11.007</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Engineering and Applied Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>EAAS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-07-17T15:53:29.3333094</lastEdited><Created>2022-11-18T10:44:55.0344676</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Omar W.</firstname><surname>Althomali</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Chelsea</firstname><surname>Starbuck</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6266-2876</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Saud</firstname><surname>Alarifi</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Khalid K.</firstname><surname>Alsaqri</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Walaa S.</firstname><surname>Mohammad</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Walaa M.</firstname><surname>Elsais</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><order>7</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>61950__25825__c994dd38f23945c594296356895d5f37.pdf</filename><originalFilename>61950.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-11-18T10:50:05.1925594</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>424408</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2023-11-17T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><documentNotes>©2022 All rights reserved. All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (CC-BY-NC-ND)</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2024-07-17T15:53:29.3333094 v2 61950 2022-11-18 The effect of foot position during static calibration trials on knee kinematic and kinetics during walking b12b936789e5be3976b2f2c1c8988d4c 0000-0001-6266-2876 Chelsea Starbuck Chelsea Starbuck true false 2022-11-18 EAAS BackgroundGait analysis has been used extensively for computing knee kinematics and kinetics, in particular, in healthy and impaired individuals. One variable assessed is the external knee adduction moment (EKAM). Variations in EKAM values between investigations may be caused by changes in static standing position, especially foot placement angles which may increase or reduce any differences seen.Purpose of the studyThe current study aimed to explore the influence of static trial foot position on knee kinematic and kinetic variables during walking.MethodsTwelve healthy male participants completed three different static standing trials; 1) 20-degrees toe-in, 2) 0 degree and 3) 20-degrees toe-out before walking at their own pace during a lower limb kinematics and kinetics assessment. First and second peak EKAM was compared between static foot position trials, as well other knee kinematic and kinetic outcomes. Repeated measures ANOVA was used with post hoc pairwise comparison to determine the differences between static foot position trials.ResultsThe first peak of EKAM was significantly smaller in the 20o toe-out angle, than the 20o toe-in angle (p = 0.04 - 8.16% reduction). Furthermore, significant changes were found in peak knee kinematics and kinetics variables (adduction angle, external rotation angle, knee flexion moment external rotation moment, abduction angle and internal rotation angle) in the different positions.ConclusionModification in static foot position between study visits may result in changes especially in the 1st peak EKAM and other kinematics and kinetics variables during walking. Therefore, standardisation of static foot position should be utilised in longitudinal studies to ensure changes in EKAM are not masked or accentuated between assessments. Journal Article Gait and Posture 99 133 138 Elsevier BV 0966-6362 Static standing position, 3D gait analysis, kinematics, kinetics, knee adduction moment 1 1 2023 2023-01-01 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.11.007 COLLEGE NANME Engineering and Applied Sciences School COLLEGE CODE EAAS Swansea University 2024-07-17T15:53:29.3333094 2022-11-18T10:44:55.0344676 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences Omar W. Althomali 1 Chelsea Starbuck 0000-0001-6266-2876 2 Saud Alarifi 3 Khalid K. Alsaqri 4 Walaa S. Mohammad 5 Walaa M. Elsais 6 Richard Jones 7 61950__25825__c994dd38f23945c594296356895d5f37.pdf 61950.pdf 2022-11-18T10:50:05.1925594 Output 424408 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2023-11-17T00:00:00.0000000 ©2022 All rights reserved. All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (CC-BY-NC-ND) true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
title |
The effect of foot position during static calibration trials on knee kinematic and kinetics during walking |
spellingShingle |
The effect of foot position during static calibration trials on knee kinematic and kinetics during walking Chelsea Starbuck |
title_short |
The effect of foot position during static calibration trials on knee kinematic and kinetics during walking |
title_full |
The effect of foot position during static calibration trials on knee kinematic and kinetics during walking |
title_fullStr |
The effect of foot position during static calibration trials on knee kinematic and kinetics during walking |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effect of foot position during static calibration trials on knee kinematic and kinetics during walking |
title_sort |
The effect of foot position during static calibration trials on knee kinematic and kinetics during walking |
author_id_str_mv |
b12b936789e5be3976b2f2c1c8988d4c |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
b12b936789e5be3976b2f2c1c8988d4c_***_Chelsea Starbuck |
author |
Chelsea Starbuck |
author2 |
Omar W. Althomali Chelsea Starbuck Saud Alarifi Khalid K. Alsaqri Walaa S. Mohammad Walaa M. Elsais Richard Jones |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Gait and Posture |
container_volume |
99 |
container_start_page |
133 |
publishDate |
2023 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0966-6362 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.11.007 |
publisher |
Elsevier BV |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
BackgroundGait analysis has been used extensively for computing knee kinematics and kinetics, in particular, in healthy and impaired individuals. One variable assessed is the external knee adduction moment (EKAM). Variations in EKAM values between investigations may be caused by changes in static standing position, especially foot placement angles which may increase or reduce any differences seen.Purpose of the studyThe current study aimed to explore the influence of static trial foot position on knee kinematic and kinetic variables during walking.MethodsTwelve healthy male participants completed three different static standing trials; 1) 20-degrees toe-in, 2) 0 degree and 3) 20-degrees toe-out before walking at their own pace during a lower limb kinematics and kinetics assessment. First and second peak EKAM was compared between static foot position trials, as well other knee kinematic and kinetic outcomes. Repeated measures ANOVA was used with post hoc pairwise comparison to determine the differences between static foot position trials.ResultsThe first peak of EKAM was significantly smaller in the 20o toe-out angle, than the 20o toe-in angle (p = 0.04 - 8.16% reduction). Furthermore, significant changes were found in peak knee kinematics and kinetics variables (adduction angle, external rotation angle, knee flexion moment external rotation moment, abduction angle and internal rotation angle) in the different positions.ConclusionModification in static foot position between study visits may result in changes especially in the 1st peak EKAM and other kinematics and kinetics variables during walking. Therefore, standardisation of static foot position should be utilised in longitudinal studies to ensure changes in EKAM are not masked or accentuated between assessments. |
published_date |
2023-01-01T14:20:36Z |
_version_ |
1821324960169197568 |
score |
11.048042 |