How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace

Zhang, Bibi; Wisse, Barbara; Lord, Robert G.

doi:10.1002/ejsp.2930

Journal article 667 views 75 downloads

How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace

Bibi Zhang

, Barbara Wisse, Robert G. Lord

European Journal of Social Psychology, Volume: 53, Issue: 4, Pages: 681 - 702

Swansea University Author: Bibi Zhang

PDF | Version of Record

© 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Download (1.58MB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1002/ejsp.2930

Abstract

Objectification often has profound negative consequences for the victims, yet we argue that objectification may have positive ancillary implications for the perpetrators. Drawing from system justification theory, we posit that especially in organizations characterized by higher power distance, objec...

Full description

Published in:	European Journal of Social Psychology
ISSN:	0046-2772 1099-0992
Published:	Wiley 2023
Online Access:	Check full text
URI:	https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa61676
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

first_indexed	2022-11-03T09:08:36Z
last_indexed	2023-01-21T04:11:25Z
id	cronfa61676
recordtype	SURis
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>61676</id><entry>2022-10-30</entry><title>How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>75093b56ba50da0f779b01e67847b821</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-5715-4500</ORCID><firstname>Bibi</firstname><surname>Zhang</surname><name>Bibi Zhang</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-10-30</date><deptcode>BBU</deptcode><abstract>Objectification often has profound negative consequences for the victims, yet we argue that objectification may have positive ancillary implications for the perpetrators. Drawing from system justification theory, we posit that especially in organizations characterized by higher power distance, objectifying supervisors would be afforded more power by their subordinates because they would deem such behavior as more typical (i.e., descriptive justification) and more desirable (i.e., prescriptive justification). The results of two experiments (N = 443 and N = 211) showed that high (vs. low) power distance subordinates afforded less power to a non-objectifying supervisor (but not more power to an objectifying supervisor), and that prescriptive justification (but not descriptive justification) mediated the interaction effect of objectification and power distance on power affordance. In a field survey with dyads of supervisors and subordinates (N = 122), we found that subordinates with relatively high power distance orientations afforded power to their objectifying supervisors through prescriptive justification. Our research contributes to objectification literature by demonstrating when and how supervisor objectification can be rationalized and perpetuated through granting objectifiers power.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>European Journal of Social Psychology</journal><volume>53</volume><journalNumber>4</journalNumber><paginationStart>681</paginationStart><paginationEnd>702</paginationEnd><publisher>Wiley</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0046-2772</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1099-0992</issnElectronic><keywords>objectification, power affordance, power distance, system justification</keywords><publishedDay>5</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-01-05</publishedDate><doi>10.1002/ejsp.2930</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Business</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>BBU</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders>Durham University</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2023-11-29T17:45:00.6430581</lastEdited><Created>2022-10-30T17:39:17.5388262</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Management - Business Management</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Bibi</firstname><surname>Zhang</surname><orcid>0000-0001-5715-4500</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Barbara</firstname><surname>Wisse</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Robert G.</firstname><surname>Lord</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>61676__26348__86df6ca8e07a482295d2fd581543ae11.pdf</filename><originalFilename>61676.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2023-01-20T18:09:12.7401738</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1661112</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling	v2 61676 2022-10-30 How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace 75093b56ba50da0f779b01e67847b821 0000-0001-5715-4500 Bibi Zhang Bibi Zhang true false 2022-10-30 BBU Objectification often has profound negative consequences for the victims, yet we argue that objectification may have positive ancillary implications for the perpetrators. Drawing from system justification theory, we posit that especially in organizations characterized by higher power distance, objectifying supervisors would be afforded more power by their subordinates because they would deem such behavior as more typical (i.e., descriptive justification) and more desirable (i.e., prescriptive justification). The results of two experiments (N = 443 and N = 211) showed that high (vs. low) power distance subordinates afforded less power to a non-objectifying supervisor (but not more power to an objectifying supervisor), and that prescriptive justification (but not descriptive justification) mediated the interaction effect of objectification and power distance on power affordance. In a field survey with dyads of supervisors and subordinates (N = 122), we found that subordinates with relatively high power distance orientations afforded power to their objectifying supervisors through prescriptive justification. Our research contributes to objectification literature by demonstrating when and how supervisor objectification can be rationalized and perpetuated through granting objectifiers power. Journal Article European Journal of Social Psychology 53 4 681 702 Wiley 0046-2772 1099-0992 objectification, power affordance, power distance, system justification 5 1 2023 2023-01-05 10.1002/ejsp.2930 COLLEGE NANME Business COLLEGE CODE BBU Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee Durham University 2023-11-29T17:45:00.6430581 2022-10-30T17:39:17.5388262 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Management - Business Management Bibi Zhang 0000-0001-5715-4500 1 Barbara Wisse 2 Robert G. Lord 3 61676__26348__86df6ca8e07a482295d2fd581543ae11.pdf 61676.pdf 2023-01-20T18:09:12.7401738 Output 1661112 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title	How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace
spellingShingle	How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace Bibi Zhang
title_short	How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace
title_full	How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace
title_fullStr	How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace
title_full_unstemmed	How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace
title_sort	How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace
author_id_str_mv	75093b56ba50da0f779b01e67847b821
author_id_fullname_str_mv	75093b56ba50da0f779b01e67847b821_***_Bibi Zhang
author	Bibi Zhang
author2	Bibi Zhang Barbara Wisse Robert G. Lord
format	Journal article
container_title	European Journal of Social Psychology
container_volume	53
container_issue	4
container_start_page	681
publishDate	2023
institution	Swansea University
issn	0046-2772 1099-0992
doi_str_mv	10.1002/ejsp.2930
publisher	Wiley
college_str	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id	facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id	facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str	School of Management - Business Management{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Management - Business Management
document_store_str	1
active_str	0
description	Objectification often has profound negative consequences for the victims, yet we argue that objectification may have positive ancillary implications for the perpetrators. Drawing from system justification theory, we posit that especially in organizations characterized by higher power distance, objectifying supervisors would be afforded more power by their subordinates because they would deem such behavior as more typical (i.e., descriptive justification) and more desirable (i.e., prescriptive justification). The results of two experiments (N = 443 and N = 211) showed that high (vs. low) power distance subordinates afforded less power to a non-objectifying supervisor (but not more power to an objectifying supervisor), and that prescriptive justification (but not descriptive justification) mediated the interaction effect of objectification and power distance on power affordance. In a field survey with dyads of supervisors and subordinates (N = 122), we found that subordinates with relatively high power distance orientations afforded power to their objectifying supervisors through prescriptive justification. Our research contributes to objectification literature by demonstrating when and how supervisor objectification can be rationalized and perpetuated through granting objectifiers power.
published_date	2023-01-05T17:45:01Z
_version_	1783921274221756416
score	11.013194

How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace

Similar Items