Journal article 891 views 101 downloads
How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace
European Journal of Social Psychology, Volume: 53, Issue: 4, Pages: 681 - 702
Swansea University Author: Bibi Zhang
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Download (1.58MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1002/ejsp.2930
Abstract
Objectification often has profound negative consequences for the victims, yet we argue that objectification may have positive ancillary implications for the perpetrators. Drawing from system justification theory, we posit that especially in organizations characterized by higher power distance, objec...
Published in: | European Journal of Social Psychology |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0046-2772 1099-0992 |
Published: |
Wiley
2023
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa61676 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2022-11-03T09:08:36Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2023-01-21T04:11:25Z |
id |
cronfa61676 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>61676</id><entry>2022-10-30</entry><title>How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>75093b56ba50da0f779b01e67847b821</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-5715-4500</ORCID><firstname>Bibi</firstname><surname>Zhang</surname><name>Bibi Zhang</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-10-30</date><deptcode>BBU</deptcode><abstract>Objectification often has profound negative consequences for the victims, yet we argue that objectification may have positive ancillary implications for the perpetrators. Drawing from system justification theory, we posit that especially in organizations characterized by higher power distance, objectifying supervisors would be afforded more power by their subordinates because they would deem such behavior as more typical (i.e., descriptive justification) and more desirable (i.e., prescriptive justification). The results of two experiments (N = 443 and N = 211) showed that high (vs. low) power distance subordinates afforded less power to a non-objectifying supervisor (but not more power to an objectifying supervisor), and that prescriptive justification (but not descriptive justification) mediated the interaction effect of objectification and power distance on power affordance. In a field survey with dyads of supervisors and subordinates (N = 122), we found that subordinates with relatively high power distance orientations afforded power to their objectifying supervisors through prescriptive justification. Our research contributes to objectification literature by demonstrating when and how supervisor objectification can be rationalized and perpetuated through granting objectifiers power.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>European Journal of Social Psychology</journal><volume>53</volume><journalNumber>4</journalNumber><paginationStart>681</paginationStart><paginationEnd>702</paginationEnd><publisher>Wiley</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0046-2772</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1099-0992</issnElectronic><keywords>objectification, power affordance, power distance, system justification</keywords><publishedDay>5</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-01-05</publishedDate><doi>10.1002/ejsp.2930</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Business</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>BBU</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders>Durham University</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2023-11-29T17:45:00.6430581</lastEdited><Created>2022-10-30T17:39:17.5388262</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Management - Business Management</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Bibi</firstname><surname>Zhang</surname><orcid>0000-0001-5715-4500</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Barbara</firstname><surname>Wisse</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Robert G.</firstname><surname>Lord</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>61676__26348__86df6ca8e07a482295d2fd581543ae11.pdf</filename><originalFilename>61676.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2023-01-20T18:09:12.7401738</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1661112</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
v2 61676 2022-10-30 How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace 75093b56ba50da0f779b01e67847b821 0000-0001-5715-4500 Bibi Zhang Bibi Zhang true false 2022-10-30 BBU Objectification often has profound negative consequences for the victims, yet we argue that objectification may have positive ancillary implications for the perpetrators. Drawing from system justification theory, we posit that especially in organizations characterized by higher power distance, objectifying supervisors would be afforded more power by their subordinates because they would deem such behavior as more typical (i.e., descriptive justification) and more desirable (i.e., prescriptive justification). The results of two experiments (N = 443 and N = 211) showed that high (vs. low) power distance subordinates afforded less power to a non-objectifying supervisor (but not more power to an objectifying supervisor), and that prescriptive justification (but not descriptive justification) mediated the interaction effect of objectification and power distance on power affordance. In a field survey with dyads of supervisors and subordinates (N = 122), we found that subordinates with relatively high power distance orientations afforded power to their objectifying supervisors through prescriptive justification. Our research contributes to objectification literature by demonstrating when and how supervisor objectification can be rationalized and perpetuated through granting objectifiers power. Journal Article European Journal of Social Psychology 53 4 681 702 Wiley 0046-2772 1099-0992 objectification, power affordance, power distance, system justification 5 1 2023 2023-01-05 10.1002/ejsp.2930 COLLEGE NANME Business COLLEGE CODE BBU Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee Durham University 2023-11-29T17:45:00.6430581 2022-10-30T17:39:17.5388262 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Management - Business Management Bibi Zhang 0000-0001-5715-4500 1 Barbara Wisse 2 Robert G. Lord 3 61676__26348__86df6ca8e07a482295d2fd581543ae11.pdf 61676.pdf 2023-01-20T18:09:12.7401738 Output 1661112 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace |
spellingShingle |
How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace Bibi Zhang |
title_short |
How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace |
title_full |
How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace |
title_fullStr |
How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace |
title_full_unstemmed |
How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace |
title_sort |
How objectifiers are granted power in the workplace |
author_id_str_mv |
75093b56ba50da0f779b01e67847b821 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
75093b56ba50da0f779b01e67847b821_***_Bibi Zhang |
author |
Bibi Zhang |
author2 |
Bibi Zhang Barbara Wisse Robert G. Lord |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
European Journal of Social Psychology |
container_volume |
53 |
container_issue |
4 |
container_start_page |
681 |
publishDate |
2023 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0046-2772 1099-0992 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1002/ejsp.2930 |
publisher |
Wiley |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Management - Business Management{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Management - Business Management |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Objectification often has profound negative consequences for the victims, yet we argue that objectification may have positive ancillary implications for the perpetrators. Drawing from system justification theory, we posit that especially in organizations characterized by higher power distance, objectifying supervisors would be afforded more power by their subordinates because they would deem such behavior as more typical (i.e., descriptive justification) and more desirable (i.e., prescriptive justification). The results of two experiments (N = 443 and N = 211) showed that high (vs. low) power distance subordinates afforded less power to a non-objectifying supervisor (but not more power to an objectifying supervisor), and that prescriptive justification (but not descriptive justification) mediated the interaction effect of objectification and power distance on power affordance. In a field survey with dyads of supervisors and subordinates (N = 122), we found that subordinates with relatively high power distance orientations afforded power to their objectifying supervisors through prescriptive justification. Our research contributes to objectification literature by demonstrating when and how supervisor objectification can be rationalized and perpetuated through granting objectifiers power. |
published_date |
2023-01-05T17:45:01Z |
_version_ |
1783921274221756416 |
score |
11.037603 |