No Cover Image

Journal article 23062 views 40 downloads

Assessment of physical fitness during pregnancy: validity and reliability of fitness tests, and relationship with maternal and neonatal health – a systematic review

Lidia Romero-Gallardo Orcid Logo, Olga Roldan Reoyo, Jose Castro-Piñero Orcid Logo, Linda E May Orcid Logo, Olga Ocón-Hernández Orcid Logo, Michelle F Mottola Orcid Logo, Virginia A Aparicio Orcid Logo, Alberto Soriano-Maldonado Orcid Logo

BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, Volume: 8, Issue: 3, Start page: e001318

Swansea University Author: Olga Roldan Reoyo

  • 61367.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license

    Download (1.29MB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001318

Abstract

Objectives To systematically review studies evaluating one or more components of physical fitness (PF) in pregnant women, to answer two research questions: (1) What tests have been employed to assess PF in pregnant women? and (2) What is the validity and reliability of these tests and their relation...

Full description

Published in: BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
ISSN: 2055-7647
Published: BMJ 2022
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa61367
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2022-09-27T15:36:13Z
last_indexed 2023-01-13T19:22:06Z
id cronfa61367
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-10-12T11:27:55.1689120</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>61367</id><entry>2022-09-27</entry><title>Assessment of physical fitness during pregnancy: validity and reliability of fitness tests, and relationship with maternal and neonatal health &#x2013; a systematic review</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>35f52c995d9f8758aac2ac079605faea</sid><firstname>Olga</firstname><surname>Roldan Reoyo</surname><name>Olga Roldan Reoyo</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-09-27</date><deptcode>STSC</deptcode><abstract>Objectives To systematically review studies evaluating one or more components of physical fitness (PF) in pregnant women, to answer two research questions: (1) What tests have been employed to assess PF in pregnant women? and (2) What is the validity and reliability of these tests and their relationship with maternal and neonatal health?Design A systematic review.Data sources PubMed and Web of Science.Eligibility criteria Original English or Spanish full-text articles in a group of healthy pregnant women which at least one component of PF was assessed (field based or laboratory tests).Results A total of 149 articles containing a sum of 191 fitness tests were included. Among the 191 fitness tests, 99 (ie, 52%) assessed cardiorespiratory fitness through 75 different protocols, 28 (15%) assessed muscular fitness through 16 different protocols, 14 (7%) assessed flexibility through 13 different protocols, 45 (24%) assessed balance through 40 different protocols, 2 assessed speed with the same protocol and 3 were multidimensional tests using one protocol. A total of 19 articles with 23 tests (13%) assessed either validity (n=4), reliability (n=6) or the relationship of PF with maternal and neonatal health (n=16).Conclusion Physical fitness has been assessed through a wide variety of protocols, mostly lacking validity and reliability data, and no consensus exists on the most suitable fitness tests to be performed during pregnancy.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>BMJ Open Sport &amp;amp; Exercise Medicine</journal><volume>8</volume><journalNumber>3</journalNumber><paginationStart>e001318</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>BMJ</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>2055-7647</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>23</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2022</publishedYear><publishedDate>2022-09-23</publishedDate><doi>10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001318</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Sport and Exercise Sciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>STSC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>This study has been partially funded by the University of Granada, Plan Propio de Investigaci&#xF3;n 2016, Excellence actions: Units of Excellence: Unit of Excellence on Exercise and Health (UCEES), and by the Junta de Andaluc&#xED;a, Consejer&#xED;a de Conocimiento, Investigaci&#xF3;n y Universidades and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), ref. SOMM17/6107/UGR.</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-10-12T11:27:55.1689120</lastEdited><Created>2022-09-27T16:29:52.0340310</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Lidia</firstname><surname>Romero-Gallardo</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6341-855x</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Olga</firstname><surname>Roldan Reoyo</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Jose</firstname><surname>Castro-Pi&#xF1;ero</surname><orcid>0000-0002-7353-0382</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Linda E</firstname><surname>May</surname><orcid>0000-0002-8231-2280</orcid><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Olga</firstname><surname>Oc&#xF3;n-Hern&#xE1;ndez</surname><orcid>0000-0002-8113-3651</orcid><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Michelle F</firstname><surname>Mottola</surname><orcid>0000-0002-8707-4656</orcid><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Virginia A</firstname><surname>Aparicio</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2867-378x</orcid><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Alberto</firstname><surname>Soriano-Maldonado</surname><orcid>0000-0002-4626-420x</orcid><order>8</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>61367__25241__0b6650830df34d168bdce888918ac7c7.pdf</filename><originalFilename>61367.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-09-27T16:34:22.3472716</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1352278</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-10-12T11:27:55.1689120 v2 61367 2022-09-27 Assessment of physical fitness during pregnancy: validity and reliability of fitness tests, and relationship with maternal and neonatal health – a systematic review 35f52c995d9f8758aac2ac079605faea Olga Roldan Reoyo Olga Roldan Reoyo true false 2022-09-27 STSC Objectives To systematically review studies evaluating one or more components of physical fitness (PF) in pregnant women, to answer two research questions: (1) What tests have been employed to assess PF in pregnant women? and (2) What is the validity and reliability of these tests and their relationship with maternal and neonatal health?Design A systematic review.Data sources PubMed and Web of Science.Eligibility criteria Original English or Spanish full-text articles in a group of healthy pregnant women which at least one component of PF was assessed (field based or laboratory tests).Results A total of 149 articles containing a sum of 191 fitness tests were included. Among the 191 fitness tests, 99 (ie, 52%) assessed cardiorespiratory fitness through 75 different protocols, 28 (15%) assessed muscular fitness through 16 different protocols, 14 (7%) assessed flexibility through 13 different protocols, 45 (24%) assessed balance through 40 different protocols, 2 assessed speed with the same protocol and 3 were multidimensional tests using one protocol. A total of 19 articles with 23 tests (13%) assessed either validity (n=4), reliability (n=6) or the relationship of PF with maternal and neonatal health (n=16).Conclusion Physical fitness has been assessed through a wide variety of protocols, mostly lacking validity and reliability data, and no consensus exists on the most suitable fitness tests to be performed during pregnancy. Journal Article BMJ Open Sport &amp; Exercise Medicine 8 3 e001318 BMJ 2055-7647 23 9 2022 2022-09-23 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001318 COLLEGE NANME Sport and Exercise Sciences COLLEGE CODE STSC Swansea University This study has been partially funded by the University of Granada, Plan Propio de Investigación 2016, Excellence actions: Units of Excellence: Unit of Excellence on Exercise and Health (UCEES), and by the Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Conocimiento, Investigación y Universidades and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), ref. SOMM17/6107/UGR. 2022-10-12T11:27:55.1689120 2022-09-27T16:29:52.0340310 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences Lidia Romero-Gallardo 0000-0001-6341-855x 1 Olga Roldan Reoyo 2 Jose Castro-Piñero 0000-0002-7353-0382 3 Linda E May 0000-0002-8231-2280 4 Olga Ocón-Hernández 0000-0002-8113-3651 5 Michelle F Mottola 0000-0002-8707-4656 6 Virginia A Aparicio 0000-0002-2867-378x 7 Alberto Soriano-Maldonado 0000-0002-4626-420x 8 61367__25241__0b6650830df34d168bdce888918ac7c7.pdf 61367.pdf 2022-09-27T16:34:22.3472716 Output 1352278 application/pdf Version of Record true This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
title Assessment of physical fitness during pregnancy: validity and reliability of fitness tests, and relationship with maternal and neonatal health – a systematic review
spellingShingle Assessment of physical fitness during pregnancy: validity and reliability of fitness tests, and relationship with maternal and neonatal health – a systematic review
Olga Roldan Reoyo
title_short Assessment of physical fitness during pregnancy: validity and reliability of fitness tests, and relationship with maternal and neonatal health – a systematic review
title_full Assessment of physical fitness during pregnancy: validity and reliability of fitness tests, and relationship with maternal and neonatal health – a systematic review
title_fullStr Assessment of physical fitness during pregnancy: validity and reliability of fitness tests, and relationship with maternal and neonatal health – a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of physical fitness during pregnancy: validity and reliability of fitness tests, and relationship with maternal and neonatal health – a systematic review
title_sort Assessment of physical fitness during pregnancy: validity and reliability of fitness tests, and relationship with maternal and neonatal health – a systematic review
author_id_str_mv 35f52c995d9f8758aac2ac079605faea
author_id_fullname_str_mv 35f52c995d9f8758aac2ac079605faea_***_Olga Roldan Reoyo
author Olga Roldan Reoyo
author2 Lidia Romero-Gallardo
Olga Roldan Reoyo
Jose Castro-Piñero
Linda E May
Olga Ocón-Hernández
Michelle F Mottola
Virginia A Aparicio
Alberto Soriano-Maldonado
format Journal article
container_title BMJ Open Sport &amp; Exercise Medicine
container_volume 8
container_issue 3
container_start_page e001318
publishDate 2022
institution Swansea University
issn 2055-7647
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001318
publisher BMJ
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Objectives To systematically review studies evaluating one or more components of physical fitness (PF) in pregnant women, to answer two research questions: (1) What tests have been employed to assess PF in pregnant women? and (2) What is the validity and reliability of these tests and their relationship with maternal and neonatal health?Design A systematic review.Data sources PubMed and Web of Science.Eligibility criteria Original English or Spanish full-text articles in a group of healthy pregnant women which at least one component of PF was assessed (field based or laboratory tests).Results A total of 149 articles containing a sum of 191 fitness tests were included. Among the 191 fitness tests, 99 (ie, 52%) assessed cardiorespiratory fitness through 75 different protocols, 28 (15%) assessed muscular fitness through 16 different protocols, 14 (7%) assessed flexibility through 13 different protocols, 45 (24%) assessed balance through 40 different protocols, 2 assessed speed with the same protocol and 3 were multidimensional tests using one protocol. A total of 19 articles with 23 tests (13%) assessed either validity (n=4), reliability (n=6) or the relationship of PF with maternal and neonatal health (n=16).Conclusion Physical fitness has been assessed through a wide variety of protocols, mostly lacking validity and reliability data, and no consensus exists on the most suitable fitness tests to be performed during pregnancy.
published_date 2022-09-23T04:20:10Z
_version_ 1763754335957680128
score 11.016593

Similar Items