Journal article 753 views 156 downloads
Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding
Displays, Volume: 74, Start page: 102290
Swansea University Author: Irene Reppa
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
Download (2.19MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.displa.2022.102290
Abstract
Icons play an important role in modern interfaces and therefore recent empirical research has focused on enhancing icon processing — that is, icon perception and icon function understanding. However, in existing sets, icons vary simultaneously across different icon characteristics, confusing the con...
Published in: | Displays |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0141-9382 |
Published: |
Elsevier BV
2022
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa60870 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2022-08-23T11:14:19Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2023-01-13T19:21:19Z |
id |
cronfa60870 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-09-23T16:13:41.8991780</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>60870</id><entry>2022-08-23</entry><title>Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7824f127c16603af4e08530245a62400</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-2853-2311</ORCID><firstname>Irene</firstname><surname>Reppa</surname><name>Irene Reppa</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-08-23</date><deptcode>HPS</deptcode><abstract>Icons play an important role in modern interfaces and therefore recent empirical research has focused on enhancing icon processing — that is, icon perception and icon function understanding. However, in existing sets, icons vary simultaneously across different icon characteristics, confusing the contribution of each to icon processing. We developed icon design principles for aesthetics, complexity, and concreteness, and used them to create 64 icons that varied independently along each characteristic. Participants reported the icon function and rated each icon in terms of aesthetics, complexity and concreteness. The manipulated characteristics had independent effects on icon processing, with two exceptions, for which we propose evidence-based solutions. Based on these findings we propose guidelines for designing icons for research purposes.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Displays</journal><volume>74</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>102290</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0141-9382</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>Aesthetics; PerceptionIcon Design; Icon-Function Understanding; Reflective Practice; Human-Computer Interaction</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2022</publishedYear><publishedDate>2022-09-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.displa.2022.102290</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>We thank the Europe Chapter of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society for awarding the VRC Corporation grant to two authors of this publication, Romain Collaud and Lara Défayes.</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-09-23T16:13:41.8991780</lastEdited><Created>2022-08-23T12:07:08.2111912</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Romain</firstname><surname>Collaud</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Irene</firstname><surname>Reppa</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2853-2311</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Lara</firstname><surname>Défayes</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Sinè</firstname><surname>McDougall</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Nicolas</firstname><surname>Henchoz</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Andreas</firstname><surname>Sonderegger</surname><order>6</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>60870__25083__05f0eb1ea8da4be591214186344e2f2c.pdf</filename><originalFilename>60870_VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-09-06T15:10:21.5037680</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>2299304</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2022-09-23T16:13:41.8991780 v2 60870 2022-08-23 Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding 7824f127c16603af4e08530245a62400 0000-0002-2853-2311 Irene Reppa Irene Reppa true false 2022-08-23 HPS Icons play an important role in modern interfaces and therefore recent empirical research has focused on enhancing icon processing — that is, icon perception and icon function understanding. However, in existing sets, icons vary simultaneously across different icon characteristics, confusing the contribution of each to icon processing. We developed icon design principles for aesthetics, complexity, and concreteness, and used them to create 64 icons that varied independently along each characteristic. Participants reported the icon function and rated each icon in terms of aesthetics, complexity and concreteness. The manipulated characteristics had independent effects on icon processing, with two exceptions, for which we propose evidence-based solutions. Based on these findings we propose guidelines for designing icons for research purposes. Journal Article Displays 74 102290 Elsevier BV 0141-9382 Aesthetics; PerceptionIcon Design; Icon-Function Understanding; Reflective Practice; Human-Computer Interaction 1 9 2022 2022-09-01 10.1016/j.displa.2022.102290 COLLEGE NANME Psychology COLLEGE CODE HPS Swansea University We thank the Europe Chapter of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society for awarding the VRC Corporation grant to two authors of this publication, Romain Collaud and Lara Défayes. 2022-09-23T16:13:41.8991780 2022-08-23T12:07:08.2111912 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Romain Collaud 1 Irene Reppa 0000-0002-2853-2311 2 Lara Défayes 3 Sinè McDougall 4 Nicolas Henchoz 5 Andreas Sonderegger 6 60870__25083__05f0eb1ea8da4be591214186344e2f2c.pdf 60870_VoR.pdf 2022-09-06T15:10:21.5037680 Output 2299304 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding |
spellingShingle |
Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding Irene Reppa |
title_short |
Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding |
title_full |
Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding |
title_fullStr |
Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding |
title_full_unstemmed |
Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding |
title_sort |
Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding |
author_id_str_mv |
7824f127c16603af4e08530245a62400 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
7824f127c16603af4e08530245a62400_***_Irene Reppa |
author |
Irene Reppa |
author2 |
Romain Collaud Irene Reppa Lara Défayes Sinè McDougall Nicolas Henchoz Andreas Sonderegger |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Displays |
container_volume |
74 |
container_start_page |
102290 |
publishDate |
2022 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0141-9382 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.displa.2022.102290 |
publisher |
Elsevier BV |
college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
department_str |
School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Icons play an important role in modern interfaces and therefore recent empirical research has focused on enhancing icon processing — that is, icon perception and icon function understanding. However, in existing sets, icons vary simultaneously across different icon characteristics, confusing the contribution of each to icon processing. We developed icon design principles for aesthetics, complexity, and concreteness, and used them to create 64 icons that varied independently along each characteristic. Participants reported the icon function and rated each icon in terms of aesthetics, complexity and concreteness. The manipulated characteristics had independent effects on icon processing, with two exceptions, for which we propose evidence-based solutions. Based on these findings we propose guidelines for designing icons for research purposes. |
published_date |
2022-09-01T04:19:20Z |
_version_ |
1763754283886444544 |
score |
11.037056 |