No Cover Image

Journal article 753 views 156 downloads

Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding

Romain Collaud, Irene Reppa Orcid Logo, Lara Défayes, Sinè McDougall, Nicolas Henchoz, Andreas Sonderegger

Displays, Volume: 74, Start page: 102290

Swansea University Author: Irene Reppa Orcid Logo

  • 60870_VoR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license

    Download (2.19MB)

Abstract

Icons play an important role in modern interfaces and therefore recent empirical research has focused on enhancing icon processing — that is, icon perception and icon function understanding. However, in existing sets, icons vary simultaneously across different icon characteristics, confusing the con...

Full description

Published in: Displays
ISSN: 0141-9382
Published: Elsevier BV 2022
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa60870
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2022-08-23T11:14:19Z
last_indexed 2023-01-13T19:21:19Z
id cronfa60870
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-09-23T16:13:41.8991780</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>60870</id><entry>2022-08-23</entry><title>Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7824f127c16603af4e08530245a62400</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-2853-2311</ORCID><firstname>Irene</firstname><surname>Reppa</surname><name>Irene Reppa</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-08-23</date><deptcode>HPS</deptcode><abstract>Icons play an important role in modern interfaces and therefore recent empirical research has focused on enhancing icon processing &#x2014; that is, icon perception and icon function understanding. However, in existing sets, icons vary simultaneously across different icon characteristics, confusing the contribution of each to icon processing. We developed icon design principles for aesthetics, complexity, and concreteness, and used them to create 64 icons that varied independently along each characteristic. Participants reported the icon function and rated each icon in terms of aesthetics, complexity and concreteness. The manipulated characteristics had independent effects on icon processing, with two exceptions, for which we propose evidence-based solutions. Based on these findings we propose guidelines for designing icons for research purposes.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Displays</journal><volume>74</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>102290</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0141-9382</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>Aesthetics; PerceptionIcon Design; Icon-Function Understanding; Reflective Practice; Human-Computer Interaction</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2022</publishedYear><publishedDate>2022-09-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.displa.2022.102290</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>We thank the Europe Chapter of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society for awarding the VRC Corporation grant to two authors of this publication, Romain Collaud and Lara D&#xE9;fayes.</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-09-23T16:13:41.8991780</lastEdited><Created>2022-08-23T12:07:08.2111912</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Romain</firstname><surname>Collaud</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Irene</firstname><surname>Reppa</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2853-2311</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Lara</firstname><surname>D&#xE9;fayes</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Sin&#xE8;</firstname><surname>McDougall</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Nicolas</firstname><surname>Henchoz</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Andreas</firstname><surname>Sonderegger</surname><order>6</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>60870__25083__05f0eb1ea8da4be591214186344e2f2c.pdf</filename><originalFilename>60870_VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-09-06T15:10:21.5037680</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>2299304</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>&#xA9; 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-09-23T16:13:41.8991780 v2 60870 2022-08-23 Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding 7824f127c16603af4e08530245a62400 0000-0002-2853-2311 Irene Reppa Irene Reppa true false 2022-08-23 HPS Icons play an important role in modern interfaces and therefore recent empirical research has focused on enhancing icon processing — that is, icon perception and icon function understanding. However, in existing sets, icons vary simultaneously across different icon characteristics, confusing the contribution of each to icon processing. We developed icon design principles for aesthetics, complexity, and concreteness, and used them to create 64 icons that varied independently along each characteristic. Participants reported the icon function and rated each icon in terms of aesthetics, complexity and concreteness. The manipulated characteristics had independent effects on icon processing, with two exceptions, for which we propose evidence-based solutions. Based on these findings we propose guidelines for designing icons for research purposes. Journal Article Displays 74 102290 Elsevier BV 0141-9382 Aesthetics; PerceptionIcon Design; Icon-Function Understanding; Reflective Practice; Human-Computer Interaction 1 9 2022 2022-09-01 10.1016/j.displa.2022.102290 COLLEGE NANME Psychology COLLEGE CODE HPS Swansea University We thank the Europe Chapter of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society for awarding the VRC Corporation grant to two authors of this publication, Romain Collaud and Lara Défayes. 2022-09-23T16:13:41.8991780 2022-08-23T12:07:08.2111912 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Romain Collaud 1 Irene Reppa 0000-0002-2853-2311 2 Lara Défayes 3 Sinè McDougall 4 Nicolas Henchoz 5 Andreas Sonderegger 6 60870__25083__05f0eb1ea8da4be591214186344e2f2c.pdf 60870_VoR.pdf 2022-09-06T15:10:21.5037680 Output 2299304 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding
spellingShingle Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding
Irene Reppa
title_short Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding
title_full Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding
title_fullStr Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding
title_full_unstemmed Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding
title_sort Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding
author_id_str_mv 7824f127c16603af4e08530245a62400
author_id_fullname_str_mv 7824f127c16603af4e08530245a62400_***_Irene Reppa
author Irene Reppa
author2 Romain Collaud
Irene Reppa
Lara Défayes
Sinè McDougall
Nicolas Henchoz
Andreas Sonderegger
format Journal article
container_title Displays
container_volume 74
container_start_page 102290
publishDate 2022
institution Swansea University
issn 0141-9382
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.displa.2022.102290
publisher Elsevier BV
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Icons play an important role in modern interfaces and therefore recent empirical research has focused on enhancing icon processing — that is, icon perception and icon function understanding. However, in existing sets, icons vary simultaneously across different icon characteristics, confusing the contribution of each to icon processing. We developed icon design principles for aesthetics, complexity, and concreteness, and used them to create 64 icons that varied independently along each characteristic. Participants reported the icon function and rated each icon in terms of aesthetics, complexity and concreteness. The manipulated characteristics had independent effects on icon processing, with two exceptions, for which we propose evidence-based solutions. Based on these findings we propose guidelines for designing icons for research purposes.
published_date 2022-09-01T04:19:20Z
_version_ 1763754283886444544
score 11.037056