Journal article 696 views 119 downloads
The optimisation of hot isostatic pressing treatments for enhanced mechanical and corrosion performance of stainless steel 316L produced by laser powder bed fusion
Additive Manufacturing, Volume: 58, Start page: 103072
Swansea University Authors: Iwan Grech, James Sullivan , Robert Lancaster , Nicholas Lavery
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
Download (8.29MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.addma.2022.103072
Abstract
This work compares the mechanical and corrosion properties of 316L steel manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and post treated by Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) to wrought 316L. HIP is often used by default on LPBF components to reduce porosity and obtain the best mechanical properties, howe...
Published in: | Additive Manufacturing |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2214-8604 |
Published: |
Elsevier BV
2022
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa60813 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2022-08-15T11:03:27Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2023-01-13T19:21:13Z |
id |
cronfa60813 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-09-07T14:32:13.5101606</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>60813</id><entry>2022-08-15</entry><title>The optimisation of hot isostatic pressing treatments for enhanced mechanical and corrosion performance of stainless steel 316L produced by laser powder bed fusion</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>0ecb76fcdec2b7950f36c8ec57d00aac</sid><firstname>Iwan</firstname><surname>Grech</surname><name>Iwan Grech</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>40e32d66748ab74184a31207ab145708</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-1018-773X</ORCID><firstname>James</firstname><surname>Sullivan</surname><name>James Sullivan</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>e1a1b126acd3e4ff734691ec34967f29</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-1365-6944</ORCID><firstname>Robert</firstname><surname>Lancaster</surname><name>Robert Lancaster</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>9f102ff59824fd4f7ce3d40144304395</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-0953-5936</ORCID><firstname>Nicholas</firstname><surname>Lavery</surname><name>Nicholas Lavery</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-08-15</date><deptcode>FGSEN</deptcode><abstract>This work compares the mechanical and corrosion properties of 316L steel manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and post treated by Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) to wrought 316L. HIP is often used by default on LPBF components to reduce porosity and obtain the best mechanical properties, however, if the HIP temperatures are too high, there is a risk of reducing mechanical strength and corrosion resistance. The purpose of this work was to investigate the HIP parameters and understand the trade-off in properties. By choosing various HIP temperatures (700 °C, 1125 °C, 1200 °C), pressures (100 MPa, 137 MPa and 200 MPa) and hold times, optimal cycles were investigated based on the most favourable mechanical properties (density, hardness, tensile and low-cycle fatigue), and pitting corrosion resistance.Microstructural features associated with LPBF such as melt pools, melt pool boundaries and sub granular cells were observed. These features were found to disappear with longer and higher temperature treatments, accompanied by increased grain sizes. Low and mid temperature point HIP treatments resulted in higher ultimate tensile strength but lower fracture elongation. The decreasing hardness and tensile strength trends were consistent with decreased grain boundary strengthening and decreased dislocation strengthening (with disappearing sub grain boundary and granular cells). Only one HIP condition, consisting of a low temperature and medium pressure, produced samples that achieved runout under low cycle fatigue testing for both the lower and higher stresses. Despite this, most higher temperature HIP cycles reduced the fatigue resistance. This was again attributed to the coarsening of the microstructure at the higher temperature treatments.The spread of the pitting potentials of HIP treated samples was reduced by 52.46 % compared to the as-built material, although none were better overall compared to the wrought material. Of all the properties, porosity appears to play the most influential role on pitting corrosion, and to this extent, despite having a larger variation in results, some of the treated parts demonstrated improved pitting resistance and some demonstrated improved repassivation potentials compared to wrought 316L.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Additive Manufacturing</journal><volume>58</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>103072</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>2214-8604</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>Laser powder bed fusion, Stainless steel 316L, Hot isostatic pressing, Mechanical properties, Corrosion</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>10</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2022</publishedYear><publishedDate>2022-10-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.addma.2022.103072</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Science and Engineering - Faculty</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>FGSEN</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal)</apcterm><funders>This work was funded by the Defence Science and Technology Lab (DSTL) Project code: DSTLX1000128518.</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-09-07T14:32:13.5101606</lastEdited><Created>2022-08-15T11:48:28.4448633</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Mechanical Engineering</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Iwan</firstname><surname>Grech</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>James</firstname><surname>Sullivan</surname><orcid>0000-0003-1018-773X</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Robert</firstname><surname>Lancaster</surname><orcid>0000-0002-1365-6944</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>J.</firstname><surname>Plummer</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Nicholas</firstname><surname>Lavery</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0953-5936</orcid><order>5</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>60813__24994__3fd8bbedb8fb4cd1816148642c1c307d.pdf</filename><originalFilename>60813_VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-08-23T13:52:27.1048985</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>8689845</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2022-09-07T14:32:13.5101606 v2 60813 2022-08-15 The optimisation of hot isostatic pressing treatments for enhanced mechanical and corrosion performance of stainless steel 316L produced by laser powder bed fusion 0ecb76fcdec2b7950f36c8ec57d00aac Iwan Grech Iwan Grech true false 40e32d66748ab74184a31207ab145708 0000-0003-1018-773X James Sullivan James Sullivan true false e1a1b126acd3e4ff734691ec34967f29 0000-0002-1365-6944 Robert Lancaster Robert Lancaster true false 9f102ff59824fd4f7ce3d40144304395 0000-0003-0953-5936 Nicholas Lavery Nicholas Lavery true false 2022-08-15 FGSEN This work compares the mechanical and corrosion properties of 316L steel manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and post treated by Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) to wrought 316L. HIP is often used by default on LPBF components to reduce porosity and obtain the best mechanical properties, however, if the HIP temperatures are too high, there is a risk of reducing mechanical strength and corrosion resistance. The purpose of this work was to investigate the HIP parameters and understand the trade-off in properties. By choosing various HIP temperatures (700 °C, 1125 °C, 1200 °C), pressures (100 MPa, 137 MPa and 200 MPa) and hold times, optimal cycles were investigated based on the most favourable mechanical properties (density, hardness, tensile and low-cycle fatigue), and pitting corrosion resistance.Microstructural features associated with LPBF such as melt pools, melt pool boundaries and sub granular cells were observed. These features were found to disappear with longer and higher temperature treatments, accompanied by increased grain sizes. Low and mid temperature point HIP treatments resulted in higher ultimate tensile strength but lower fracture elongation. The decreasing hardness and tensile strength trends were consistent with decreased grain boundary strengthening and decreased dislocation strengthening (with disappearing sub grain boundary and granular cells). Only one HIP condition, consisting of a low temperature and medium pressure, produced samples that achieved runout under low cycle fatigue testing for both the lower and higher stresses. Despite this, most higher temperature HIP cycles reduced the fatigue resistance. This was again attributed to the coarsening of the microstructure at the higher temperature treatments.The spread of the pitting potentials of HIP treated samples was reduced by 52.46 % compared to the as-built material, although none were better overall compared to the wrought material. Of all the properties, porosity appears to play the most influential role on pitting corrosion, and to this extent, despite having a larger variation in results, some of the treated parts demonstrated improved pitting resistance and some demonstrated improved repassivation potentials compared to wrought 316L. Journal Article Additive Manufacturing 58 103072 Elsevier BV 2214-8604 Laser powder bed fusion, Stainless steel 316L, Hot isostatic pressing, Mechanical properties, Corrosion 1 10 2022 2022-10-01 10.1016/j.addma.2022.103072 COLLEGE NANME Science and Engineering - Faculty COLLEGE CODE FGSEN Swansea University SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal) This work was funded by the Defence Science and Technology Lab (DSTL) Project code: DSTLX1000128518. 2022-09-07T14:32:13.5101606 2022-08-15T11:48:28.4448633 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Mechanical Engineering Iwan Grech 1 James Sullivan 0000-0003-1018-773X 2 Robert Lancaster 0000-0002-1365-6944 3 J. Plummer 4 Nicholas Lavery 0000-0003-0953-5936 5 60813__24994__3fd8bbedb8fb4cd1816148642c1c307d.pdf 60813_VoR.pdf 2022-08-23T13:52:27.1048985 Output 8689845 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
title |
The optimisation of hot isostatic pressing treatments for enhanced mechanical and corrosion performance of stainless steel 316L produced by laser powder bed fusion |
spellingShingle |
The optimisation of hot isostatic pressing treatments for enhanced mechanical and corrosion performance of stainless steel 316L produced by laser powder bed fusion Iwan Grech James Sullivan Robert Lancaster Nicholas Lavery |
title_short |
The optimisation of hot isostatic pressing treatments for enhanced mechanical and corrosion performance of stainless steel 316L produced by laser powder bed fusion |
title_full |
The optimisation of hot isostatic pressing treatments for enhanced mechanical and corrosion performance of stainless steel 316L produced by laser powder bed fusion |
title_fullStr |
The optimisation of hot isostatic pressing treatments for enhanced mechanical and corrosion performance of stainless steel 316L produced by laser powder bed fusion |
title_full_unstemmed |
The optimisation of hot isostatic pressing treatments for enhanced mechanical and corrosion performance of stainless steel 316L produced by laser powder bed fusion |
title_sort |
The optimisation of hot isostatic pressing treatments for enhanced mechanical and corrosion performance of stainless steel 316L produced by laser powder bed fusion |
author_id_str_mv |
0ecb76fcdec2b7950f36c8ec57d00aac 40e32d66748ab74184a31207ab145708 e1a1b126acd3e4ff734691ec34967f29 9f102ff59824fd4f7ce3d40144304395 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
0ecb76fcdec2b7950f36c8ec57d00aac_***_Iwan Grech 40e32d66748ab74184a31207ab145708_***_James Sullivan e1a1b126acd3e4ff734691ec34967f29_***_Robert Lancaster 9f102ff59824fd4f7ce3d40144304395_***_Nicholas Lavery |
author |
Iwan Grech James Sullivan Robert Lancaster Nicholas Lavery |
author2 |
Iwan Grech James Sullivan Robert Lancaster J. Plummer Nicholas Lavery |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Additive Manufacturing |
container_volume |
58 |
container_start_page |
103072 |
publishDate |
2022 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
2214-8604 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.addma.2022.103072 |
publisher |
Elsevier BV |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Mechanical Engineering{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Mechanical Engineering |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
This work compares the mechanical and corrosion properties of 316L steel manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and post treated by Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) to wrought 316L. HIP is often used by default on LPBF components to reduce porosity and obtain the best mechanical properties, however, if the HIP temperatures are too high, there is a risk of reducing mechanical strength and corrosion resistance. The purpose of this work was to investigate the HIP parameters and understand the trade-off in properties. By choosing various HIP temperatures (700 °C, 1125 °C, 1200 °C), pressures (100 MPa, 137 MPa and 200 MPa) and hold times, optimal cycles were investigated based on the most favourable mechanical properties (density, hardness, tensile and low-cycle fatigue), and pitting corrosion resistance.Microstructural features associated with LPBF such as melt pools, melt pool boundaries and sub granular cells were observed. These features were found to disappear with longer and higher temperature treatments, accompanied by increased grain sizes. Low and mid temperature point HIP treatments resulted in higher ultimate tensile strength but lower fracture elongation. The decreasing hardness and tensile strength trends were consistent with decreased grain boundary strengthening and decreased dislocation strengthening (with disappearing sub grain boundary and granular cells). Only one HIP condition, consisting of a low temperature and medium pressure, produced samples that achieved runout under low cycle fatigue testing for both the lower and higher stresses. Despite this, most higher temperature HIP cycles reduced the fatigue resistance. This was again attributed to the coarsening of the microstructure at the higher temperature treatments.The spread of the pitting potentials of HIP treated samples was reduced by 52.46 % compared to the as-built material, although none were better overall compared to the wrought material. Of all the properties, porosity appears to play the most influential role on pitting corrosion, and to this extent, despite having a larger variation in results, some of the treated parts demonstrated improved pitting resistance and some demonstrated improved repassivation potentials compared to wrought 316L. |
published_date |
2022-10-01T04:19:14Z |
_version_ |
1763754277126275072 |
score |
11.037056 |