Journal article 708 views 215 downloads
Assessing the use of co-design to produce bespoke assistive technology solutions within a current healthcare service: a service evaluation
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Volume: 19, Issue: 1, Pages: 42 - 51
Swansea University Authors: Jonathan Howard, Zoe Fisher , Jeremy Tree
-
PDF | Accepted Manuscript
Download (614.62KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1080/17483107.2022.2060355
Abstract
Purpose: Co-design involves engaging with the end-user in the design process and may help reduce the barriers to assistive technology use. Previous research has used co-design in the provision of assistive technology, but no research has looked at applying it within a healthcare setting. This servic...
Published in: | Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1748-3107 1748-3115 |
Published: |
Informa UK Limited
2024
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa60332 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2022-06-28T17:25:35Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2023-01-13T19:20:23Z |
id |
cronfa60332 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>60332</id><entry>2022-06-28</entry><title>Assessing the use of co-design to produce bespoke assistive technology solutions within a current healthcare service: a service evaluation</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>8c6f2c4ea5cda309383977baee7a98d3</sid><firstname>Jonathan</firstname><surname>Howard</surname><name>Jonathan Howard</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>b7d5965d35de6f683716c6eb1e82ff81</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8150-2499</ORCID><firstname>Zoe</firstname><surname>Fisher</surname><name>Zoe Fisher</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6000-8125</ORCID><firstname>Jeremy</firstname><surname>Tree</surname><name>Jeremy Tree</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-06-28</date><abstract>Purpose: Co-design involves engaging with the end-user in the design process and may help reduce the barriers to assistive technology use. Previous research has used co-design in the provision of assistive technology, but no research has looked at applying it within a healthcare setting. This service evaluation examines the use of co-design in providing customized assistive devices within a current UK healthcare based Rehabilitation Engineering department. Methods: This evaluation reports on three case studies. Individuals identified a range of challenges in daily living. The participants worked with the clinician in trialling prototypes and providing feedback to develop custom devices. A mixed-method approach of questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were used to evaluate the devices provided and the co-design approach. The resources required to provide the device were also calculated. Results: Five different devices were developed, which were able to overcome the challenges identified. Results indicated participants were satisfied with both the devices and service provided. Participants expressed other benefits including increased independence, increased positive emotions and reduced mental load. Participants indicated they liked being involved in the design process and their feedback helped ensure the devices were customized to their needs. Conclusions: The use of co-design was able to produce customized assistive device that met the needs of the individuals within a current healthcare service. Further work is required to assess the feasibility of utilising a co-design approach for the provision of other custom assistive technology in the future and explore if this can overcome the barriers to assistive technology use.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology</journal><volume>19</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart>42</paginationStart><paginationEnd>51</paginationEnd><publisher>Informa UK Limited</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1748-3107</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1748-3115</issnElectronic><keywords>Assistive technology, custom assistive devices, Co-design, participatory design, user involvement</keywords><publishedDay>2</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-01-02</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/17483107.2022.2060355</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-06-06T13:41:17.2146329</lastEdited><Created>2022-06-28T18:17:02.4851698</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Jonathan</firstname><surname>Howard</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Lorna H.</firstname><surname>Tasker</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Zoe</firstname><surname>Fisher</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8150-2499</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Jeremy</firstname><surname>Tree</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6000-8125</orcid><order>4</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>60332__24611__d3f8b209f6124c37b56c9f65945eca56.pdf</filename><originalFilename>60332.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-07-15T11:59:15.9478380</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>629372</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2023-04-15T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
v2 60332 2022-06-28 Assessing the use of co-design to produce bespoke assistive technology solutions within a current healthcare service: a service evaluation 8c6f2c4ea5cda309383977baee7a98d3 Jonathan Howard Jonathan Howard true false b7d5965d35de6f683716c6eb1e82ff81 0000-0001-8150-2499 Zoe Fisher Zoe Fisher true false 373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad 0000-0001-6000-8125 Jeremy Tree Jeremy Tree true false 2022-06-28 Purpose: Co-design involves engaging with the end-user in the design process and may help reduce the barriers to assistive technology use. Previous research has used co-design in the provision of assistive technology, but no research has looked at applying it within a healthcare setting. This service evaluation examines the use of co-design in providing customized assistive devices within a current UK healthcare based Rehabilitation Engineering department. Methods: This evaluation reports on three case studies. Individuals identified a range of challenges in daily living. The participants worked with the clinician in trialling prototypes and providing feedback to develop custom devices. A mixed-method approach of questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were used to evaluate the devices provided and the co-design approach. The resources required to provide the device were also calculated. Results: Five different devices were developed, which were able to overcome the challenges identified. Results indicated participants were satisfied with both the devices and service provided. Participants expressed other benefits including increased independence, increased positive emotions and reduced mental load. Participants indicated they liked being involved in the design process and their feedback helped ensure the devices were customized to their needs. Conclusions: The use of co-design was able to produce customized assistive device that met the needs of the individuals within a current healthcare service. Further work is required to assess the feasibility of utilising a co-design approach for the provision of other custom assistive technology in the future and explore if this can overcome the barriers to assistive technology use. Journal Article Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 19 1 42 51 Informa UK Limited 1748-3107 1748-3115 Assistive technology, custom assistive devices, Co-design, participatory design, user involvement 2 1 2024 2024-01-02 10.1080/17483107.2022.2060355 COLLEGE NANME COLLEGE CODE Swansea University 2024-06-06T13:41:17.2146329 2022-06-28T18:17:02.4851698 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Jonathan Howard 1 Lorna H. Tasker 2 Zoe Fisher 0000-0001-8150-2499 3 Jeremy Tree 0000-0001-6000-8125 4 60332__24611__d3f8b209f6124c37b56c9f65945eca56.pdf 60332.pdf 2022-07-15T11:59:15.9478380 Output 629372 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2023-04-15T00:00:00.0000000 true eng |
title |
Assessing the use of co-design to produce bespoke assistive technology solutions within a current healthcare service: a service evaluation |
spellingShingle |
Assessing the use of co-design to produce bespoke assistive technology solutions within a current healthcare service: a service evaluation Jonathan Howard Zoe Fisher Jeremy Tree |
title_short |
Assessing the use of co-design to produce bespoke assistive technology solutions within a current healthcare service: a service evaluation |
title_full |
Assessing the use of co-design to produce bespoke assistive technology solutions within a current healthcare service: a service evaluation |
title_fullStr |
Assessing the use of co-design to produce bespoke assistive technology solutions within a current healthcare service: a service evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessing the use of co-design to produce bespoke assistive technology solutions within a current healthcare service: a service evaluation |
title_sort |
Assessing the use of co-design to produce bespoke assistive technology solutions within a current healthcare service: a service evaluation |
author_id_str_mv |
8c6f2c4ea5cda309383977baee7a98d3 b7d5965d35de6f683716c6eb1e82ff81 373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
8c6f2c4ea5cda309383977baee7a98d3_***_Jonathan Howard b7d5965d35de6f683716c6eb1e82ff81_***_Zoe Fisher 373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad_***_Jeremy Tree |
author |
Jonathan Howard Zoe Fisher Jeremy Tree |
author2 |
Jonathan Howard Lorna H. Tasker Zoe Fisher Jeremy Tree |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology |
container_volume |
19 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
42 |
publishDate |
2024 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
1748-3107 1748-3115 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1080/17483107.2022.2060355 |
publisher |
Informa UK Limited |
college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
department_str |
School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Purpose: Co-design involves engaging with the end-user in the design process and may help reduce the barriers to assistive technology use. Previous research has used co-design in the provision of assistive technology, but no research has looked at applying it within a healthcare setting. This service evaluation examines the use of co-design in providing customized assistive devices within a current UK healthcare based Rehabilitation Engineering department. Methods: This evaluation reports on three case studies. Individuals identified a range of challenges in daily living. The participants worked with the clinician in trialling prototypes and providing feedback to develop custom devices. A mixed-method approach of questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were used to evaluate the devices provided and the co-design approach. The resources required to provide the device were also calculated. Results: Five different devices were developed, which were able to overcome the challenges identified. Results indicated participants were satisfied with both the devices and service provided. Participants expressed other benefits including increased independence, increased positive emotions and reduced mental load. Participants indicated they liked being involved in the design process and their feedback helped ensure the devices were customized to their needs. Conclusions: The use of co-design was able to produce customized assistive device that met the needs of the individuals within a current healthcare service. Further work is required to assess the feasibility of utilising a co-design approach for the provision of other custom assistive technology in the future and explore if this can overcome the barriers to assistive technology use. |
published_date |
2024-01-02T13:41:18Z |
_version_ |
1801115589441224704 |
score |
11.036837 |