Journal article 1040 views 110 downloads
How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?
Animal Biotelemetry, Volume: 9, Issue: 1, Start page: 43
Swansea University Authors: Richard Gunner, Mark Holton , Philip Hopkins, Emily Shepard , Baptiste Garde, Luca Borger , James Redcliffe, Rory Wilson
-
PDF | Version of Record
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Download (5.2MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9
Abstract
Abstract: Background: Understanding what animals do in time and space is important for a range of ecological questions, however accurate estimates of how animals use space is challenging. Within the use of animal-attached tags, radio telemetry (including the Global Positioning System, ‘GPS’) is typi...
Published in: | Animal Biotelemetry |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2050-3385 |
Published: |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
2021
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa58382 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2021-10-18T09:45:09Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2021-11-04T04:24:42Z |
id |
cronfa58382 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2021-11-03T16:20:17.2229260</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>58382</id><entry>2021-10-18</entry><title>How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>2683356ac0ac5d43946ac1f5b93e00e3</sid><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Gunner</surname><name>Richard Gunner</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>0e1d89d0cc934a740dcd0a873aed178e</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8834-3283</ORCID><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Holton</surname><name>Mark Holton</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>ea4af69628fef2300653dec5b350ad76</sid><ORCID/><firstname>Philip</firstname><surname>Hopkins</surname><name>Philip Hopkins</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>54729295145aa1ea56d176818d51ed6a</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-7325-6398</ORCID><firstname>Emily</firstname><surname>Shepard</surname><name>Emily Shepard</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>0d5e96ee58acfec4771c81cd2cb4cca8</sid><firstname>Baptiste</firstname><surname>Garde</surname><name>Baptiste Garde</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8763-5997</ORCID><firstname>Luca</firstname><surname>Borger</surname><name>Luca Borger</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>4046e46611e52bf1ee798d17411df8e9</sid><firstname>James</firstname><surname>Redcliffe</surname><name>James Redcliffe</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>017bc6dd155098860945dc6249c4e9bc</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-3177-0177</ORCID><firstname>Rory</firstname><surname>Wilson</surname><name>Rory Wilson</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2021-10-18</date><deptcode>SBI</deptcode><abstract>Abstract: Background: Understanding what animals do in time and space is important for a range of ecological questions, however accurate estimates of how animals use space is challenging. Within the use of animal-attached tags, radio telemetry (including the Global Positioning System, ‘GPS’) is typically used to verify an animal’s location periodically. Straight lines are typically drawn between these ‘Verified Positions’ (‘VPs’) so the interpolation of space-use is limited by the temporal and spatial resolution of the system’s measurement. As such, parameters such as route-taken and distance travelled can be poorly represented when using VP systems alone. Dead-reckoning has been suggested as a technique to improve the accuracy and resolution of reconstructed movement paths, whilst maximising battery life of VP systems. This typically involves deriving travel vectors from motion sensor systems and periodically correcting path dimensions for drift with simultaneously deployed VP systems. How often paths should be corrected for drift, however, has remained unclear. Methods and results: Here, we review the utility of dead-reckoning across four contrasting model species using different forms of locomotion (the African lion Panthera leo, the red-tailed tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda, the Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus, and the imperial cormorant Leucocarbo atriceps). Simulations were performed to examine the extent of dead-reckoning error, relative to VPs, as a function of Verified Position correction (VP correction) rate and the effect of this on estimates of distance moved. Dead-reckoning error was greatest for animals travelling within air and water. We demonstrate how sources of measurement error can arise within VP-corrected dead-reckoned tracks and propose advancements to this procedure to maximise dead-reckoning accuracy. Conclusions: We review the utility of VP-corrected dead-reckoning according to movement type and consider a range of ecological questions that would benefit from dead-reckoning, primarily concerning animal–barrier interactions and foraging strategies.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Animal Biotelemetry</journal><volume>9</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart>43</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Springer Science and Business Media LLC</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>2050-3385</issnElectronic><keywords>Research, Biologging, Dead-reckoning, Drift, Global Positioning System (GPS), Animal movement, Animal tracking, Tilt-compensated compass, GPS correction</keywords><publishedDay>16</publishedDay><publishedMonth>10</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-10-16</publishedDate><doi>10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Biosciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SBI</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>This research contributes to the CAASE project funded by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) under the KAUST Sensor Initiative. Fieldwork in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park was supported in part by a Department for Economy Global Challenges Research Fund grant to MS. Fieldwork within the Chubut Province was supported in part by the National Agency for Scientifc and Technological Promotion of Argentina (PICT 20171996 and PICT 2018-1480), and the Grants-in-Aid for Scientifc Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16K18617, 16H06541). Field‑work at Round Island, Mauritius, was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant (715874), awarded to ELCS.</funders><lastEdited>2021-11-03T16:20:17.2229260</lastEdited><Created>2021-10-18T10:38:14.0027750</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Gunner</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Holton</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8834-3283</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>David M.</firstname><surname>Scantlebury</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Philip</firstname><surname>Hopkins</surname><orcid/><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Emily</firstname><surname>Shepard</surname><orcid>0000-0001-7325-6398</orcid><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Adam J.</firstname><surname>Fell</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Baptiste</firstname><surname>Garde</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Flavio</firstname><surname>Quintana</surname><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Agustina</firstname><surname>Gómez-Laich</surname><order>9</order></author><author><firstname>Ken</firstname><surname>Yoda</surname><order>10</order></author><author><firstname>Takashi</firstname><surname>Yamamoto</surname><order>11</order></author><author><firstname>Holly</firstname><surname>English</surname><order>12</order></author><author><firstname>Sam</firstname><surname>Ferreira</surname><order>13</order></author><author><firstname>Danny</firstname><surname>Govender</surname><order>14</order></author><author><firstname>Pauli</firstname><surname>Viljoen</surname><order>15</order></author><author><firstname>Angela</firstname><surname>Bruns</surname><order>16</order></author><author><firstname>O. Louis van</firstname><surname>Schalkwyk</surname><order>17</order></author><author><firstname>Nik C.</firstname><surname>Cole</surname><order>18</order></author><author><firstname>Vikash</firstname><surname>Tatayah</surname><order>19</order></author><author><firstname>Luca</firstname><surname>Borger</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8763-5997</orcid><order>20</order></author><author><firstname>James</firstname><surname>Redcliffe</surname><order>21</order></author><author><firstname>Stephen H.</firstname><surname>Bell</surname><order>22</order></author><author><firstname>Nikki J.</firstname><surname>Marks</surname><order>23</order></author><author><firstname>Nigel C.</firstname><surname>Bennett</surname><order>24</order></author><author><firstname>Mariano H.</firstname><surname>Tonini</surname><order>25</order></author><author><firstname>Hannah J.</firstname><surname>Williams</surname><order>26</order></author><author><firstname>Carlos M.</firstname><surname>Duarte</surname><order>27</order></author><author><firstname>Martin C. van</firstname><surname>Rooyen</surname><order>28</order></author><author><firstname>Mads F.</firstname><surname>Bertelsen</surname><order>29</order></author><author><firstname>Craig J.</firstname><surname>Tambling</surname><order>30</order></author><author><firstname>Rory</firstname><surname>Wilson</surname><orcid>0000-0003-3177-0177</orcid><order>31</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>58382__21203__44f03c62421c4efc8f4db0ef06a01d34.pdf</filename><originalFilename>58382.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2021-10-18T10:43:59.1021709</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>5449035</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2021-11-03T16:20:17.2229260 v2 58382 2021-10-18 How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? 2683356ac0ac5d43946ac1f5b93e00e3 Richard Gunner Richard Gunner true false 0e1d89d0cc934a740dcd0a873aed178e 0000-0001-8834-3283 Mark Holton Mark Holton true false ea4af69628fef2300653dec5b350ad76 Philip Hopkins Philip Hopkins true false 54729295145aa1ea56d176818d51ed6a 0000-0001-7325-6398 Emily Shepard Emily Shepard true false 0d5e96ee58acfec4771c81cd2cb4cca8 Baptiste Garde Baptiste Garde true false 8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2 0000-0001-8763-5997 Luca Borger Luca Borger true false 4046e46611e52bf1ee798d17411df8e9 James Redcliffe James Redcliffe true false 017bc6dd155098860945dc6249c4e9bc 0000-0003-3177-0177 Rory Wilson Rory Wilson true false 2021-10-18 SBI Abstract: Background: Understanding what animals do in time and space is important for a range of ecological questions, however accurate estimates of how animals use space is challenging. Within the use of animal-attached tags, radio telemetry (including the Global Positioning System, ‘GPS’) is typically used to verify an animal’s location periodically. Straight lines are typically drawn between these ‘Verified Positions’ (‘VPs’) so the interpolation of space-use is limited by the temporal and spatial resolution of the system’s measurement. As such, parameters such as route-taken and distance travelled can be poorly represented when using VP systems alone. Dead-reckoning has been suggested as a technique to improve the accuracy and resolution of reconstructed movement paths, whilst maximising battery life of VP systems. This typically involves deriving travel vectors from motion sensor systems and periodically correcting path dimensions for drift with simultaneously deployed VP systems. How often paths should be corrected for drift, however, has remained unclear. Methods and results: Here, we review the utility of dead-reckoning across four contrasting model species using different forms of locomotion (the African lion Panthera leo, the red-tailed tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda, the Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus, and the imperial cormorant Leucocarbo atriceps). Simulations were performed to examine the extent of dead-reckoning error, relative to VPs, as a function of Verified Position correction (VP correction) rate and the effect of this on estimates of distance moved. Dead-reckoning error was greatest for animals travelling within air and water. We demonstrate how sources of measurement error can arise within VP-corrected dead-reckoned tracks and propose advancements to this procedure to maximise dead-reckoning accuracy. Conclusions: We review the utility of VP-corrected dead-reckoning according to movement type and consider a range of ecological questions that would benefit from dead-reckoning, primarily concerning animal–barrier interactions and foraging strategies. Journal Article Animal Biotelemetry 9 1 43 Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2050-3385 Research, Biologging, Dead-reckoning, Drift, Global Positioning System (GPS), Animal movement, Animal tracking, Tilt-compensated compass, GPS correction 16 10 2021 2021-10-16 10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9 COLLEGE NANME Biosciences COLLEGE CODE SBI Swansea University This research contributes to the CAASE project funded by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) under the KAUST Sensor Initiative. Fieldwork in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park was supported in part by a Department for Economy Global Challenges Research Fund grant to MS. Fieldwork within the Chubut Province was supported in part by the National Agency for Scientifc and Technological Promotion of Argentina (PICT 20171996 and PICT 2018-1480), and the Grants-in-Aid for Scientifc Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16K18617, 16H06541). Field‑work at Round Island, Mauritius, was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant (715874), awarded to ELCS. 2021-11-03T16:20:17.2229260 2021-10-18T10:38:14.0027750 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences Richard Gunner 1 Mark Holton 0000-0001-8834-3283 2 David M. Scantlebury 3 Philip Hopkins 4 Emily Shepard 0000-0001-7325-6398 5 Adam J. Fell 6 Baptiste Garde 7 Flavio Quintana 8 Agustina Gómez-Laich 9 Ken Yoda 10 Takashi Yamamoto 11 Holly English 12 Sam Ferreira 13 Danny Govender 14 Pauli Viljoen 15 Angela Bruns 16 O. Louis van Schalkwyk 17 Nik C. Cole 18 Vikash Tatayah 19 Luca Borger 0000-0001-8763-5997 20 James Redcliffe 21 Stephen H. Bell 22 Nikki J. Marks 23 Nigel C. Bennett 24 Mariano H. Tonini 25 Hannah J. Williams 26 Carlos M. Duarte 27 Martin C. van Rooyen 28 Mads F. Bertelsen 29 Craig J. Tambling 30 Rory Wilson 0000-0003-3177-0177 31 58382__21203__44f03c62421c4efc8f4db0ef06a01d34.pdf 58382.pdf 2021-10-18T10:43:59.1021709 Output 5449035 application/pdf Version of Record true This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? |
spellingShingle |
How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? Richard Gunner Mark Holton Philip Hopkins Emily Shepard Baptiste Garde Luca Borger James Redcliffe Rory Wilson |
title_short |
How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? |
title_full |
How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? |
title_fullStr |
How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? |
title_sort |
How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? |
author_id_str_mv |
2683356ac0ac5d43946ac1f5b93e00e3 0e1d89d0cc934a740dcd0a873aed178e ea4af69628fef2300653dec5b350ad76 54729295145aa1ea56d176818d51ed6a 0d5e96ee58acfec4771c81cd2cb4cca8 8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2 4046e46611e52bf1ee798d17411df8e9 017bc6dd155098860945dc6249c4e9bc |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
2683356ac0ac5d43946ac1f5b93e00e3_***_Richard Gunner 0e1d89d0cc934a740dcd0a873aed178e_***_Mark Holton ea4af69628fef2300653dec5b350ad76_***_Philip Hopkins 54729295145aa1ea56d176818d51ed6a_***_Emily Shepard 0d5e96ee58acfec4771c81cd2cb4cca8_***_Baptiste Garde 8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2_***_Luca Borger 4046e46611e52bf1ee798d17411df8e9_***_James Redcliffe 017bc6dd155098860945dc6249c4e9bc_***_Rory Wilson |
author |
Richard Gunner Mark Holton Philip Hopkins Emily Shepard Baptiste Garde Luca Borger James Redcliffe Rory Wilson |
author2 |
Richard Gunner Mark Holton David M. Scantlebury Philip Hopkins Emily Shepard Adam J. Fell Baptiste Garde Flavio Quintana Agustina Gómez-Laich Ken Yoda Takashi Yamamoto Holly English Sam Ferreira Danny Govender Pauli Viljoen Angela Bruns O. Louis van Schalkwyk Nik C. Cole Vikash Tatayah Luca Borger James Redcliffe Stephen H. Bell Nikki J. Marks Nigel C. Bennett Mariano H. Tonini Hannah J. Williams Carlos M. Duarte Martin C. van Rooyen Mads F. Bertelsen Craig J. Tambling Rory Wilson |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Animal Biotelemetry |
container_volume |
9 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
43 |
publishDate |
2021 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
2050-3385 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9 |
publisher |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Abstract: Background: Understanding what animals do in time and space is important for a range of ecological questions, however accurate estimates of how animals use space is challenging. Within the use of animal-attached tags, radio telemetry (including the Global Positioning System, ‘GPS’) is typically used to verify an animal’s location periodically. Straight lines are typically drawn between these ‘Verified Positions’ (‘VPs’) so the interpolation of space-use is limited by the temporal and spatial resolution of the system’s measurement. As such, parameters such as route-taken and distance travelled can be poorly represented when using VP systems alone. Dead-reckoning has been suggested as a technique to improve the accuracy and resolution of reconstructed movement paths, whilst maximising battery life of VP systems. This typically involves deriving travel vectors from motion sensor systems and periodically correcting path dimensions for drift with simultaneously deployed VP systems. How often paths should be corrected for drift, however, has remained unclear. Methods and results: Here, we review the utility of dead-reckoning across four contrasting model species using different forms of locomotion (the African lion Panthera leo, the red-tailed tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda, the Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus, and the imperial cormorant Leucocarbo atriceps). Simulations were performed to examine the extent of dead-reckoning error, relative to VPs, as a function of Verified Position correction (VP correction) rate and the effect of this on estimates of distance moved. Dead-reckoning error was greatest for animals travelling within air and water. We demonstrate how sources of measurement error can arise within VP-corrected dead-reckoned tracks and propose advancements to this procedure to maximise dead-reckoning accuracy. Conclusions: We review the utility of VP-corrected dead-reckoning according to movement type and consider a range of ecological questions that would benefit from dead-reckoning, primarily concerning animal–barrier interactions and foraging strategies. |
published_date |
2021-10-16T04:14:52Z |
_version_ |
1763754002546163712 |
score |
11.036815 |