Journal article 1088 views 157 downloads
A moving target? An analysis of the impact of electoral context on polling error variation in both British and international general elections
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Volume: 34, Issue: 1, Pages: 18 - 40
Swansea University Authors: Jack Tudor, Matthew Wall
DOI (Published version): 10.1080/17457289.2021.1972305
Abstract
This article argues that electoral context affects the projection mechanisms inherent in polling. This insight applies both to the estimation of party vote shares by pollsters and to poll-driven substantive political expectations. We test this contention by analysing 794 in-campaign polls covering t...
Published in: | Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-7289 1745-7297 |
Published: |
Informa UK Limited
2024
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa58301 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2021-10-12T11:51:22Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2023-01-11T14:38:48Z |
id |
cronfa58301 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>58301</id><entry>2021-10-12</entry><title>A moving target? An analysis of the impact of electoral context on polling error variation in both British and international general elections</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>df9894ac4288a616edc2bae7d573c89a</sid><firstname>Jack</firstname><surname>Tudor</surname><name>Jack Tudor</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>22914658d586a5759d4d4b945ea140bd</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8265-4910</ORCID><firstname>Matthew</firstname><surname>Wall</surname><name>Matthew Wall</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2021-10-12</date><deptcode>SOSS</deptcode><abstract>This article argues that electoral context affects the projection mechanisms inherent in polling. This insight applies both to the estimation of party vote shares by pollsters and to poll-driven substantive political expectations. We test this contention by analysing 794 in-campaign polls covering the UK’s 21 post-war general elections, as well as an updated version of Jennings and Wlezien’s (2018) international polling dataset. We demonstrate that the election level accounts for a significant portion of the observed variance in polling error. This finding is shown to be valid across several modelling approaches and measures of polling accuracy.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties</journal><volume>34</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart>18</paginationStart><paginationEnd>40</paginationEnd><publisher>Informa UK Limited</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1745-7289</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1745-7297</issnElectronic><keywords>Polling error; electoral context; multi-level modelling; British general elections; intra-class correlation</keywords><publishedDay>2</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-01-02</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/17457289.2021.1972305</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Social Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SOSS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-06-05T16:35:53.9726418</lastEdited><Created>2021-10-12T12:39:21.3209125</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Jack</firstname><surname>Tudor</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Matthew</firstname><surname>Wall</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8265-4910</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>58301__21144__cc61fd7016dd480d81dfe90903f56ece.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Blinded Submission Final.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2021-10-12T12:49:41.8395018</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>811599</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2023-02-28T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><documentNotes>Released under the terms of a CC BY-NC license.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
v2 58301 2021-10-12 A moving target? An analysis of the impact of electoral context on polling error variation in both British and international general elections df9894ac4288a616edc2bae7d573c89a Jack Tudor Jack Tudor true false 22914658d586a5759d4d4b945ea140bd 0000-0001-8265-4910 Matthew Wall Matthew Wall true false 2021-10-12 SOSS This article argues that electoral context affects the projection mechanisms inherent in polling. This insight applies both to the estimation of party vote shares by pollsters and to poll-driven substantive political expectations. We test this contention by analysing 794 in-campaign polls covering the UK’s 21 post-war general elections, as well as an updated version of Jennings and Wlezien’s (2018) international polling dataset. We demonstrate that the election level accounts for a significant portion of the observed variance in polling error. This finding is shown to be valid across several modelling approaches and measures of polling accuracy. Journal Article Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 34 1 18 40 Informa UK Limited 1745-7289 1745-7297 Polling error; electoral context; multi-level modelling; British general elections; intra-class correlation 2 1 2024 2024-01-02 10.1080/17457289.2021.1972305 COLLEGE NANME Social Sciences School COLLEGE CODE SOSS Swansea University 2024-06-05T16:35:53.9726418 2021-10-12T12:39:21.3209125 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations Jack Tudor 1 Matthew Wall 0000-0001-8265-4910 2 58301__21144__cc61fd7016dd480d81dfe90903f56ece.pdf Blinded Submission Final.pdf 2021-10-12T12:49:41.8395018 Output 811599 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2023-02-28T00:00:00.0000000 Released under the terms of a CC BY-NC license. true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
title |
A moving target? An analysis of the impact of electoral context on polling error variation in both British and international general elections |
spellingShingle |
A moving target? An analysis of the impact of electoral context on polling error variation in both British and international general elections Jack Tudor Matthew Wall |
title_short |
A moving target? An analysis of the impact of electoral context on polling error variation in both British and international general elections |
title_full |
A moving target? An analysis of the impact of electoral context on polling error variation in both British and international general elections |
title_fullStr |
A moving target? An analysis of the impact of electoral context on polling error variation in both British and international general elections |
title_full_unstemmed |
A moving target? An analysis of the impact of electoral context on polling error variation in both British and international general elections |
title_sort |
A moving target? An analysis of the impact of electoral context on polling error variation in both British and international general elections |
author_id_str_mv |
df9894ac4288a616edc2bae7d573c89a 22914658d586a5759d4d4b945ea140bd |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
df9894ac4288a616edc2bae7d573c89a_***_Jack Tudor 22914658d586a5759d4d4b945ea140bd_***_Matthew Wall |
author |
Jack Tudor Matthew Wall |
author2 |
Jack Tudor Matthew Wall |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties |
container_volume |
34 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
18 |
publishDate |
2024 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
1745-7289 1745-7297 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1080/17457289.2021.1972305 |
publisher |
Informa UK Limited |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
This article argues that electoral context affects the projection mechanisms inherent in polling. This insight applies both to the estimation of party vote shares by pollsters and to poll-driven substantive political expectations. We test this contention by analysing 794 in-campaign polls covering the UK’s 21 post-war general elections, as well as an updated version of Jennings and Wlezien’s (2018) international polling dataset. We demonstrate that the election level accounts for a significant portion of the observed variance in polling error. This finding is shown to be valid across several modelling approaches and measures of polling accuracy. |
published_date |
2024-01-02T16:35:53Z |
_version_ |
1801035976079835136 |
score |
11.037581 |